Euthanasia - Physician Assisted Suicide.

Authors Avatar

Euthanasia – Physician Assisted Suicide                                     Sam Tucker, IVF

Euthanasia is a very topical issue, with Diane Pretty only recently being involved in a major debate whether people should have the right to die.  Euthanasia is derived from two Greek words, 'eu' and 'thanatos,' meaning good and easy death.  Euthanasia is sometimes called mercy killing, for "it is a desperate act of love by a person" to relieve the suffering of a terminally ill patient.  However, presently the law in the UK concerning Euthanasia states that it is illegal, and this is also in the US.  Inevitably, this causes the demand for a way to die, for people with long term diseases for example.  This is where physician assisted suicide can come to the aid of people.  

Occasionally it is argued that this is not a type of euthanasia, but generally it is viewed as euthanasia.  Physician assisted suicide refers to a physician providing the means for death, most often with a prescription. The patient, not the physician, will ultimately administer the lethal medication. Euthanasia generally means that the physician would act directly, for instance by giving a lethal injection, to end the patient's life.  I have chosen to a view it as a type of euthanasia.

There have been many raging debates as to whether physician assisted suicide is ethical, or simply immoral.  Those who are in favour often argue on the grounds that it may be a rational choice for a person who is choosing to die to escape unbearable suffering. Furthermore, the physician's duty to alleviate suffering may, at times, justify the act of providing assistance with suicide. These arguments rely a great deal on the notion of individual autonomy, recognizing the right of competent people to choose for themselves the course of their life, including how it will end.  For example, an argument in favour of physician assisted suicide would be justice.  Justice requires that courts "treat like cases alike." Competent, terminally ill patients are allowed to hasten death by treatment refusal. For some patients, treatment refusal will not suffice to hasten death; only option is suicide. Justice requires that we should allow assisted death for these patients.

Join now!

On the other hand, those that argue physician assisted suicide should remain illegal often suggest arguments such as the Sanctity of life.  This argument points out strong religious and secular traditions against taking human life. It is argued that assisted suicide is morally wrong because it contradicts these beliefs.  Also, there is the argument of Passive vs. Active distinction.  The argument here holds that there is an important difference between passively "letting die" and actively "killing." It is argued that treatment refusal or withholding treatment equates to letting die (passive) and is justifiable, whereas physician assisted suicide equates to killing ...

This is a preview of the whole essay