• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In "The Company: A Short History of a Revolutionary Idea", John Micklethwait and Adrian Wooldridge

Extracts from this document...


MIDTERM PAPER The Company: A Short History of a Revolutionary Idea In "The Company: A Short History of a Revolutionary Idea", John Micklethwait and Adrian Wooldridge capture the evolution of a business company from its earliest predecessors in 3000 B.C. in Mesopotamia to the modern day multinational corporation. They assert that it is impossible to fully understand the last four hundred years of world history without placing the joint stock company and its wide-ranging economic, political, social and cultural consequences at the heart of the picture. To show their steadfast support for the organization which they claim to be the most important one in the world, the authors claim that the limited liability company is "the basis of the prosperity of the West and the best hope for the future of the rest of the world"1. In this paper, I am not going to oppose their contention, for after reading their arguments, I find myself inclined to agree with them on the significance of capitalism and the organization of the company, as well as the benefits of both. What I am going to do though, is address the direction that the company as a whole takes, towards achieving the end of prosperity for the civilization that it serves. In simpler and less eloquent words, I am going to dissect the company's relationship with society, a persistent theme throughout the book, and one that can be scrutinized by analyzing the two forms of governance that companies can adopt. ...read more.


run should be considered as well in terms of benefits accruing to other stakeholders, instead of focusing rather narrow-mindedly on the immediate short term all the time. Having assessed the stakeholder companies and their philosophical backing in detail, I am going to move on now to the stockholder companies, building on the foundation that I have already created so far in order to compare the two and patronize one over the other. Stockholder companies, just to recap, are those which are managed with the intention of providing profits or returns on investment to the shareholders, or the owners of the business. However, even though they clearly prioritize the shareholders' interests over those of the other stakeholders, shareholder companies are still required to operate under the legal system while at the same time also conforming to the basic rules of society. After putting forth all the arguments in favor of the stockholder ideal and on the verge of doing the same for the shareholder one, I feel that at this point of time it is necessary to reveal that I share the bias of the authors, Micklethwait and Wooldridge, towards the latter. For now, in order to present my case for the shareholder model, I am going to make certain assumptions about the conditions that exist when this model is in operation. Though all these assumptions can never be absolutely true, I believe that relatively similar conditions can, in general, exist, with certain exceptions to every one. ...read more.


To conclude, I would like to stress that in today's world, the Anglo-American shareholder model is quickly gaining ground as opposed to the stakeholder one, which is even shedding some of its governing principles in its traditional strongholds of Continental Europe and Japan. However, in my view, the two models have come closer to each other over time rather than drifting apart, being displayed no greater than in America, the heart of shareholder capitalism, where companies are facing increasingly burdensome social responsibilities such as providing for the pension and healthcare costs of employees. That being said, I think that the flexibility and dynamism that is cultivated under the shareholder model will undoubtedly make it the most attractive model to implement, especially in an era where globalization and free trade will mean that competition will soar to new levels altogether. It is this rivalry though that will breed ingenuity on the part of companies, in the form of new methods, techniques, and technologies used by them. It is said that necessity is the mother of invention, and it is up to companies, society and the government to try to translate this innovation into economic and social welfare for everyone. 1 John Micklethwait and Adrian Wooldridge, The Company, Modern Library Chronicles Book, xv 2 Micklethwait and Wooldridge, 54 3 Leslie Hannah as quoted by John Micklethwait and Adrian Wooldridge, The Company, Modern Library Chronicles Book, 182 ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Political & Economic Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Political & Economic Sociology essays

  1. Discuss the factors which led to the rapid industrialisation of Japan

    At this state of the development Rostow said that there is a growth of lateral relations of world trade between nations, and finally the growth of the modern state which uses rational ideas. The third is called the take off stage, this happens to different countries at different times in history.

  2. Why does Rawls reject meritocracy?

    The most famous definition of merit is one used by Michael Young in his book Rise of the Meritocracy6. Young defines merit to be intelligence plus effort. In our society, this definition of merit has some intuitive support. We admire those with intelligence, and we generally reward it.

  1. The Promotion of Children's Rights in Zambia.

    These are complemented by national policies, discussed below. The legislation impacting most on children and women are: * Adoption Act, Cap 54 * Affiliation and maintenance of children Act, Cap 54 * Juvenile Act Cap 53 * Employment of young persons and children's Act, Cap 274.

  2. Globalization. In terms of the novelty or emergence of globalisation, this essay shall ...

    If the US was to for example reduce its demand, this would lead to the reduction in growth, and because of its interdependencies with other countries, this would have a negative impact on the other countries to which it is connected to through trading.

  1. How and why does Weber try to seek a connection between the Spirit of ...

    Therefore, Weber creates here a more complete image of what he refers to as this "spirit of modern capitalism", that he can then link to the protestant ethic I was discussing before. Weber never intended to prove the existence of a causal relationship between the Spirit of Capitalism and the

  2. Provision of Microcredit in India. Who is the champion for the Poor in ...

    I have seen first handed how microfinance can transform a village through empowerment and I hope that SHGs which provides microfinance at a relatively lower cost to be able to continue thriving in India and continue to empower the needy.

  1. How are resources allocated in a classical market economy? Based on the above definition, ...

    Many economists point enthusiastically to Hong Kong as an example of how success comes to free-market economies.

  2. What have been the government and community responses to the rioting in Bradford, Burnley ...

    who provide low-cost housing for people who are in need of a house. Housing associations do not take any profit from this and are solely there to help those in need. Building Schools for the Future and other similar projects ensured that schools were promoting segregation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work