• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15

Fluid Dynamics - Free surface profiles in an open channel.

Extracts from this document...


Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Investigation 2: Free Surface Profiles in an Open Channel. Summary The objectives of this laboratory experiment are to analyse the flow of water past a Sluice gate. Flow through a horizontal rectangular channel partially obstructed by a gate has been used to establish a hydraulic jump. Experimental measurements for upstream and downstream depths determining the free surface profile is compared to that predicted by theory for free surface profiles for the horizontal bed and Chezy's roughness coefficient for the channel. This experiment enables design implications for many real civil engineering problems to be solved, or examined critically. Introduction Open channels are frequently encountered, "Natural Streams and rivers, artificial canals, irrigation ditches and flumes are obvious examples; but pipelines or tunnels which are not completely full of liquid also have essential features of open channels."1 Predicting the free surface profile and the ability to control fluid levels especially the control of water levels and regulation of water discharge is necessary for purposes such as "irrigation, water conservation, food alleviation and inland navigation"2. This lab examines the rapid increase of depth from super-critical flow to sub-critical flow in a hydraulic jump. A hydraulic jump can occur downstream of a sluice gate (as will be the case in this lab), after a decrease in channel slope, due to an increase in roughness or channel width, or upstream of an obstacle located in a channel. It is an important energy-dissipating phenomenon; practical applications include the dissipation of energy below a spillway for the prevention of scouring farther downstream in the channel. ...read more.


Using this value for the Chezy, the constant K1 is - 5.11103 m. The profile of the Super-Critical flow can be given mathematically as, The Theoretical profile of the Supercritical flow is represented by the graph below. X is considered the independent variable and Y to be the dependent Variable. The theoretical profile is visibly different from the experimental data plot. The theoretical profile does not consider all real variables, whilst the experimental data is real engineering and the result of multiple data measurements. However, the experimental profile is a representation of the flow at that moment in time, whilst the theoretical profile may be considered as a general profile of the flow and as such is a valid generalisation of the flow. The sub critical part of the flow is located after the hydraulic jump and is where the flow reaches a steady height (Sequent Depth) and velocity. The sequent depths are related to the distance X, by the equation The Chezy coefficient has been determined as 36 and therefore the value of K is 6.718003 m, therefore the mathematical equation for sub-critical flow is, Using this equation, a plot of the theoretical and experimental profile of the sub-critical part of the flow can be determined. Initially the theoretical graph looks a very poor fit for the experimental plot. The Chezy coefficient seems too high as the gradient is too steep and the corresponding K constant is too high; however when 1.5<x<2.0 the graph is a good approximation for the laboratory data. ...read more.


0.0443 0.7 0.2306 0.4761 0.5142 0.5547 0.5976 0.6430 0.6909 0.0446 0.8 0.2334 0.5009 0.5424 0.5865 0.6333 0.6828 0.7350 In order to compare which Chezy coefficient best fits the laboratory conditions, the graph below has been produced. As can be seen the Chezy Coefficients alters the gradient of the graph. The line with a Chezy Coefficient of 36 matches the experimental plots the best. Using this value for the Chezy, the constant K1 can be calculated as - 5.11103 m. The profile of the Super-Critical flow can now be given mathematically as Appendix E The initial depths of fluid (Yinitial) are related to the sequent depths by the equation, Where, is called the Froude number, determined by The initial Equation therefore becomes, Appendix F Part I: Head loss due to the Hydraulic jump The head loss caused by the hydraulic may be calculated by the formula Where the values y1 and y2 are the depths of water just before and after the hydraulic jump. Substituting values, y1 = 0.073m and y2 = 0.1604m, = 0.01425m (1.425cm) Part II: Head loss due to Friction in the Channel The formula for calculating head loss due to friction is equivalent to calculating the specific energy head at a specific location and subtracting this from a value obtained upstream. The head loss due to friction is therefore, Where, The equation therefore becomes, Substituting values, y1 = 0.152m, y2 = 0.159m and q = 0.08744m2s-1. =5.547 x 10-3 m (0.5547cm) 1 Mechanics for fluids B.S. Massey 2 Fluid mechanics for Civil Engineers, N.B. Webber 1971 Rubinder Singh Virdee 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Hydrology & Fluvial Geomorphology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Hydrology & Fluvial Geomorphology essays

  1. Geography investigation - The River Skirfare located in the Littondale region in the Yorkshire ...

    It was deemed less important that the dog biscuit method and hence this is what this investigation relies on. It is unfortunate because the two methods complimented each other. However this is not to say that the dog biscuits method is not sufficient alone, as it does provide very significant data.

  2. How does Loughton Brook change as it moves downstream?

    CONCLUSION By following this investigation I can now answer the two key questions. From the evidence that I have gathered I can now state that the river becomes more efficient as we move downstream. The sediment become smaller and rounded as we move downstream From my sediment graphs I found

  1. Whitewell Brook: To what extent does the discharge of the Whitewell Brook agree with ...

    the extent of changes the river has taken as we get nearer the source. Ideally, we could have made a lot more stops to record data but for three reasons we did not. These were: we did not have enough time to make any more stops, there was not always

  2. River channel processes.

    CASE STUDY - HIGH FORCE WATERFALL, RIVER TEES, UK. Here the Whin sill is on top of the softer limestone which lies underneath. It is the softer limestone which gets eroded first and then the igneous rock collapses, forming the step. The gorge is notorious for its big boulders formed when the igneous rock collapses.

  1. Do the Characteristics of a river change downstream?

    River Wharfe Apparatus * Thirty centimetre ruler * Dilute Hydrochloric Acid (HCl) * Pebble roundness chart Method To save time in this experiment it seemed wise to use the pebbles that we had already collected to analyse in terms of length (l)

  2. Hard &amp;amp; Soft Engineering

    They can also be used as a bridge in order to cross the river itself. The Weir pictured below is on the River Cole. Soft engineering Techniques Revetments. Where the riverbank needs strengthening, revetments made from willow bed mattresses and other natural materials Lowering the floodplains.

  1. To find out how channel characteristics such as width, depth, area, efficiency, gradient and ...

    * Hydraulic Action- Due to the force of the river, water is forced into cracks along the river bed. The air in the cracks is compressed therefore pressure increases and in time the bank will collapse. This is the slowest and least effective erosion process.

  2. To assess whether the modified channel of the river ash is effective in reducing ...

    Houses with sloping roofs further increase the amount of run-off. The History of Flooding in the River Ash The River Ash was at risk of flooding because the river was not large enough to hold the amount of water it was supposed to.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work