• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Poor countries are more at risk from natural hazards than rich countries" How far do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Poor countries are more at risk from natural hazards than rich countries" How far do you agree with this statement? Natural hazards occur worldwide and have different negative impacts on many people, but always to different degrees and ways. Impacts can be classified into social, economic and environmental categories. Impacts can therefore vary greatly both spatially and temporally and deciding whether some impacts are more of a problem than others is difficult precisely because of this variation. However, the perception of the extent of the impacts is often influenced by the wealth of an area; LEDCs have little capital to spend on the technology to help predict and prepare for natural hazards that is often more readily available in MEDCs, generally creating a more vulnerable population in the former. This still does not prevent hazards from occurring and cannot influence the magnitude, frequency or nature of the event; three factors which are crucial in causing and affecting the extent of the impacts. The level of development in an area is an important factor that affects the impacts of natural hazards. Typically, LEDCs are seen to experience hazards with impacts considered worse than those in many MEDCs, even from the same hazard type. ...read more.

Middle

LEDCs can find this more difficult. Disease is a common problem after a hazard event. Once people have been evacuated they have to be housed in temporary accommodation and because of the lack of capital and adequate medical resources the camps often lack sanitation and clean water. After the El Salvador landslide in January 2001, 15,000 people were thought to need food supplies and three million people were believed to be without clean water. In these cramp and unsanitary conditions diseases such as typhoid and cholera can easily spread. This does not mean that impacts are 'more of a problem' merely as a result of economic development. Impacts of hazards are influenced by many variant factors. One such factor is the spatial distribution of a hazard, where the event occurs and its land-use. For example, hurricanes hit both Bangladesh in November 1970 and in Camille, USA in August 1969. Four million seven hundred thousand people were affected by the hurricane in Bangladesh whereas one million nine hundred thousand were affected in the USA. Although the Bangladesh hurricane hit a more rural area, with a naturally lower population density than Camille, it still affected more Bangladeshi people than USA residents. ...read more.

Conclusion

In terms of the economy it cost $200 billion in damages in Kobe compared to $40 billion in Northridge. This example illustrates that the impact of hazards can be very problematic in MEDCs as well as LEDCs. In conclusion therefore, it is apparent that the impacts of all hazards are dependent on a range of factors, including the development of an area. This does not mean that all impacts are 'more of a problem for people in LEDCs.' Impacts can often be very problematic for MEDCs, as the Kobe earthquake illustrates. Impacts are not totally determined by technology or equipment affordable to MEDCs, magnitude and frequency are very important factors - if an event is of unprecedented magnitude, then very little can be done to ease impacts except when dealing with the aftermath. The Mozambique floods in 2000 illustrated that point but it also showed that impacts are partly affected by development because often the main difference between MEDCs and LEDCs in their ability to overcome natural hazards is their ability to respond and manage the impacts. MEDCs, more often than not have the money to invest in research, in education, infrastructure, emergency services and emergency strategies. This is the reason that MEDCs are perceived to be able to cope better with the impacts; they can overcome the long-term impacts much easier compared to LEDCs. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Hazardous Environments section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Hazardous Environments essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The number of fatalities that result from volcanic and seismic natural hazards is related ...

    4 star(s)

    of earthquake proof buildings; buildings made of mud-brick (collapse easily into rubble); lack of enforcement of building codes / regulations; lack of research into techniques to protect the buildings from earthquakes; population boom and competition for houses (resulted in rapid building of sub-standard housing); lack of national plan for the

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Explain the increasing frequency of Hydro-meteorological Hazards.

    3 star(s)

    which perhaps would not have been before, such equipment was introduced. This would make it able for more small-scale hazards to be reported, in the more isolated area which people may not be aware of. Another suggestion, linked with that of the increase in development of technology worldwide, is the

  1. Why do LEDC's Suffer Greater Damage From Earthquakes Than MEDC's

    An earthquake is more likely to cause greater damage and greater loss of life at night time. This is because everyone are in their houses and would mean that there would be the greatest change of taking most lives if an earthquake struck at night time.

  2. "What are hazardous Environments and how can hazards be classified?"

    Many of the population were asleep at the time. Because Kobe was only 20km away from the epicentre (place of origin) this meant that the damage that was going to be caused would be in great numbers. Because a huge amount of central Kobe was built on soft rocks that are easily moved (around the port and harbour area)

  1. What is an environmental (natural) hazard?

    In some MEDCs where earthquakes are common e.g. Kobe in Japan, buildings are designed to withstand earthquakes -'earthquake-proof'. This includes steel frames, collapsing bottom floors, deep foundations, etc.. In LEDCs e.g. Mexico City in Mexico, buildings have often been built quickly and often not to proper regulations. When an earthquake did strike Mexico City suffered much more than Kobe.

  2. To what extent is the human response to hazards affected by variations in the ...

    as the region is hit most years by storm conditions, but still 80% of the cities population of approximately 200,000. The countries of Haiti and the Dominican Republic also had a storm in may in which nearly 3000 people died and this should have raised peoples awareness to the problem

  1. Compare and contrast the Philippines and Californian hotspots, giving an opinion as to which ...

    Regular monsoons and tropical storms mean that 788,572 people are exposed to frequent flooding. Typhoon Ketsana, with winds of 100mph, dumped 16.7 inches of rain in just 12 hrs in September 2009. 246 died and 2 million were affected in Manila where 80% of the city was submerged.

  2. Volcanic and seismic events are major pieces of evidence towards proving that plate-tectonics theory ...

    of the same age in adjoining locations on the opposite continents should closely match. Such is the case for the Gondwana continents ( Figure 2.4). Marine, nonmarine, and glacial rock sequences of Pennsylvanian to Jurassic age are almost identical on all ï¬ve Gondwana continents, strongly indicating that they were joined at one time.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work