• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Poor countries are more at risk from natural hazards than rich countries" How far do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Poor countries are more at risk from natural hazards than rich countries" How far do you agree with this statement? Natural hazards occur worldwide and have different negative impacts on many people, but always to different degrees and ways. Impacts can be classified into social, economic and environmental categories. Impacts can therefore vary greatly both spatially and temporally and deciding whether some impacts are more of a problem than others is difficult precisely because of this variation. However, the perception of the extent of the impacts is often influenced by the wealth of an area; LEDCs have little capital to spend on the technology to help predict and prepare for natural hazards that is often more readily available in MEDCs, generally creating a more vulnerable population in the former. This still does not prevent hazards from occurring and cannot influence the magnitude, frequency or nature of the event; three factors which are crucial in causing and affecting the extent of the impacts. The level of development in an area is an important factor that affects the impacts of natural hazards. Typically, LEDCs are seen to experience hazards with impacts considered worse than those in many MEDCs, even from the same hazard type. ...read more.

Middle

LEDCs can find this more difficult. Disease is a common problem after a hazard event. Once people have been evacuated they have to be housed in temporary accommodation and because of the lack of capital and adequate medical resources the camps often lack sanitation and clean water. After the El Salvador landslide in January 2001, 15,000 people were thought to need food supplies and three million people were believed to be without clean water. In these cramp and unsanitary conditions diseases such as typhoid and cholera can easily spread. This does not mean that impacts are 'more of a problem' merely as a result of economic development. Impacts of hazards are influenced by many variant factors. One such factor is the spatial distribution of a hazard, where the event occurs and its land-use. For example, hurricanes hit both Bangladesh in November 1970 and in Camille, USA in August 1969. Four million seven hundred thousand people were affected by the hurricane in Bangladesh whereas one million nine hundred thousand were affected in the USA. Although the Bangladesh hurricane hit a more rural area, with a naturally lower population density than Camille, it still affected more Bangladeshi people than USA residents. ...read more.

Conclusion

In terms of the economy it cost $200 billion in damages in Kobe compared to $40 billion in Northridge. This example illustrates that the impact of hazards can be very problematic in MEDCs as well as LEDCs. In conclusion therefore, it is apparent that the impacts of all hazards are dependent on a range of factors, including the development of an area. This does not mean that all impacts are 'more of a problem for people in LEDCs.' Impacts can often be very problematic for MEDCs, as the Kobe earthquake illustrates. Impacts are not totally determined by technology or equipment affordable to MEDCs, magnitude and frequency are very important factors - if an event is of unprecedented magnitude, then very little can be done to ease impacts except when dealing with the aftermath. The Mozambique floods in 2000 illustrated that point but it also showed that impacts are partly affected by development because often the main difference between MEDCs and LEDCs in their ability to overcome natural hazards is their ability to respond and manage the impacts. MEDCs, more often than not have the money to invest in research, in education, infrastructure, emergency services and emergency strategies. This is the reason that MEDCs are perceived to be able to cope better with the impacts; they can overcome the long-term impacts much easier compared to LEDCs. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Hazardous Environments section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Hazardous Environments essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The number of fatalities that result from volcanic and seismic natural hazards is related ...

    4 star(s)

    Over 45 million people in 10 provinces were affected and 15 million people were evacuated from their homes; over 5 million buildings were destroyed and 21 million damaged in Sichuan which left at least 5 million people homeless; some towns were completely destroyed; the total economic loss was estimated at

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Explain the increasing frequency of Hydro-meteorological Hazards.

    3 star(s)

    which perhaps would not have been before, such equipment was introduced. This would make it able for more small-scale hazards to be reported, in the more isolated area which people may not be aware of. Another suggestion, linked with that of the increase in development of technology worldwide, is the

  1. "What are hazardous Environments and how can hazards be classified?"

    One such earthquake occurred in 1995 in the city of Kobe, Japan. As Japan is situated on the edge of the Eurasian Plate, it is prone to major earthquakes. On January 17th 1995, the Japanese city of Kobe was hit by Japan's largest earthquake since 1923.

  2. What is an environmental (natural) hazard?

    In some MEDCs where earthquakes are common e.g. Kobe in Japan, buildings are designed to withstand earthquakes -'earthquake-proof'. This includes steel frames, collapsing bottom floors, deep foundations, etc.. In LEDCs e.g. Mexico City in Mexico, buildings have often been built quickly and often not to proper regulations. When an earthquake did strike Mexico City suffered much more than Kobe.

  1. Why do LEDC's Suffer Greater Damage From Earthquakes Than MEDC's

    We can actually see that there was more damage in the MEDC than the LEDC, which totally contradicts my hypothesis. However, we must look closer in order to find out why this is. Firstly, the earthquake in the MEDC was about 10 times bigger than the earthquake in the LEDC.

  2. To what extent is the human response to hazards affected by variations in the ...

    but no response system was put in place and few people where educated about the problem. The main cause for the flash floods which occurred in the country where caused by the quick run off of precipitation on steep inclines where mass deforestation has occurred.

  1. Hand washing Practical - How clean are your Hands?

    Sum of all colonies on all plates counted n1 = Number of plates in first dilution counted n2 = Number of plates in second dilution counted d = Dilution from which the first counts were obtained (in Litres) i.e. Plate 1: N = 29 / [(1)

  2. Volcanic and seismic events are major pieces of evidence towards proving that plate-tectonics theory ...

    Mountain ranges of the same age and deformational style are found in eastern Greenland, Ireland, Great Britain, and Norway. In fact, the same red sandstones used in the construction of many English and Scottish castles are used in various buildings throughout New York.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work