• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Poor countries are more at risk from natural hazards than rich countries" How far do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Poor countries are more at risk from natural hazards than rich countries" How far do you agree with this statement? Natural hazards occur worldwide and have different negative impacts on many people, but always to different degrees and ways. Impacts can be classified into social, economic and environmental categories. Impacts can therefore vary greatly both spatially and temporally and deciding whether some impacts are more of a problem than others is difficult precisely because of this variation. However, the perception of the extent of the impacts is often influenced by the wealth of an area; LEDCs have little capital to spend on the technology to help predict and prepare for natural hazards that is often more readily available in MEDCs, generally creating a more vulnerable population in the former. This still does not prevent hazards from occurring and cannot influence the magnitude, frequency or nature of the event; three factors which are crucial in causing and affecting the extent of the impacts. The level of development in an area is an important factor that affects the impacts of natural hazards. Typically, LEDCs are seen to experience hazards with impacts considered worse than those in many MEDCs, even from the same hazard type. ...read more.

Middle

LEDCs can find this more difficult. Disease is a common problem after a hazard event. Once people have been evacuated they have to be housed in temporary accommodation and because of the lack of capital and adequate medical resources the camps often lack sanitation and clean water. After the El Salvador landslide in January 2001, 15,000 people were thought to need food supplies and three million people were believed to be without clean water. In these cramp and unsanitary conditions diseases such as typhoid and cholera can easily spread. This does not mean that impacts are 'more of a problem' merely as a result of economic development. Impacts of hazards are influenced by many variant factors. One such factor is the spatial distribution of a hazard, where the event occurs and its land-use. For example, hurricanes hit both Bangladesh in November 1970 and in Camille, USA in August 1969. Four million seven hundred thousand people were affected by the hurricane in Bangladesh whereas one million nine hundred thousand were affected in the USA. Although the Bangladesh hurricane hit a more rural area, with a naturally lower population density than Camille, it still affected more Bangladeshi people than USA residents. ...read more.

Conclusion

In terms of the economy it cost $200 billion in damages in Kobe compared to $40 billion in Northridge. This example illustrates that the impact of hazards can be very problematic in MEDCs as well as LEDCs. In conclusion therefore, it is apparent that the impacts of all hazards are dependent on a range of factors, including the development of an area. This does not mean that all impacts are 'more of a problem for people in LEDCs.' Impacts can often be very problematic for MEDCs, as the Kobe earthquake illustrates. Impacts are not totally determined by technology or equipment affordable to MEDCs, magnitude and frequency are very important factors - if an event is of unprecedented magnitude, then very little can be done to ease impacts except when dealing with the aftermath. The Mozambique floods in 2000 illustrated that point but it also showed that impacts are partly affected by development because often the main difference between MEDCs and LEDCs in their ability to overcome natural hazards is their ability to respond and manage the impacts. MEDCs, more often than not have the money to invest in research, in education, infrastructure, emergency services and emergency strategies. This is the reason that MEDCs are perceived to be able to cope better with the impacts; they can overcome the long-term impacts much easier compared to LEDCs. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Hazardous Environments section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Hazardous Environments essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The number of fatalities that result from volcanic and seismic natural hazards is related ...

    4 star(s)

    event of a disaster and extreme cold temperatures made conditions for survivors difficult. On 12th of May 2008 an earthquake of a magnitude 7.9 on the Richter scale hit 90km west/north-west of Chengdu, Sichuan, in south-eastern China (an NIC that is recently being considered an MEDC).

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Explain the increasing frequency of Hydro-meteorological Hazards.

    3 star(s)

    Countries as far apart as Australia and Africa may suffer disruption to their normal rainfall patterns, which can result in severe flooding or drought. It can also cause winter temperatures to fall upon North America and can increase winter rainfall over Eastern Europe.

  1. Why do LEDC's Suffer Greater Damage From Earthquakes Than MEDC's

    Furthermore, if the houses are not built to a high standard, then they would not be able to withstand the tremors or aftershocks form the earthquake. If the houses and buildings were built to a high standard, then a great deal of damage would be prevented.

  2. Compare and contrast the Philippines and Californian hotspots, giving an opinion as to which ...

    Wildfires grow frighteningly fast particularly during the dry Santa Ana wind periods. Los Angeles is most at risk as the city is expanding quickly and drawing closer to wildfire prone areas. On top of this the large population is putting a strain on the water supply and strict water restriction

  1. Critically Examine the View that Natural Hazards Appear to be Occurring with Increasing.

    This will obviously lead to floods in the future, as there will be no channel for the water to be stored. 2nd) The enhanced greenhouse effect has been blamed for an increase in floods. This is caused by increased human use of CFC gases and methane.

  2. Hand washing Practical - How clean are your Hands?

    Record dilution(s) used and total number of colonies counted. 7.2 If the number of CFU per plate exceeds 250, record the counts as too numerous to count (TNTC) Results: Aerobic Plate Counts Calculated using following equation3: N = ?c / [(1*n1) + (0.1*n2)] * d Where: N = Number of colonies per ml or g of product c =

  1. To what extent is magnitude the main factor to influence the type and level ...

    Consequently, in order to counter this I have cross referenced any information I have gained online in order to ensure it is accurate and reliable. This is done to avoid any inconsistent references or inaccuracies which could undermine the validity of the report and its conclusions and to ensure the information is both reliable and reliable.

  2. Volcanic and seismic events are major pieces of evidence towards proving that plate-tectonics theory ...

    In South America and Africa there are very thick glacial deposits of the same age (Permian-Carboniferous). The deposits match almost exactly when the continents are moved back together. As glacial ice moves, it cuts grooves and scratches in underlying rocks and produces folds and wrinkles in soft sediments.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work