• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

River Studies

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Geography MYP Coursework River Studies Rio Lizandro is a river located in Portugal, near the district of Lisbon, and has an approximate length of 30km. In this coursework, we have to test the hypothesis related to the characteristics of the Rio Lizandro to discover if it is justified. In order to do so, we will have to draw, measure and calculate the data which we are give on four different sites along the river, and thus conclude with an analysis on the relationship between our results and the given hypothesis. Task 2: State the aim of the study. You need to explain the hypothesis and perhaps suggest what you expect to be the outcome referring to Bradshaw's Model River. The aim of this study is to use the given data on the four different sites along the Rio Lizandro to see how its river variables change and compare it to Bradshaw's model. By doing this, we will be able to test the hypothesis and conclude on whether or not it is correct. The Bradshaw Model is a geographical model which illustrates how a river's characteristics differ from the mouth to source, or lower course to upper course, of a river. According to Bradshaw's model, the hypothesis is that "Stream characteristics (i.e. cross-sectional area, discharge, velocity, efficiency, and gradient) ...read more.

Middle

Gradient: 1�. Dist. from Left bank (m) 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 Depth (m) 0.0 0.32 0.20 0.16 0.16 0.22 0.27 0.38 0.25 0.20 0.13 0.05 0.23 0.25 0.21 0.12 0.07 0.02 0.0 Velocity measured over 10 metres in the centre of the river flow: Attempt Time in seconds 1st 10 2nd 12 3rd 14 Average time = 10+12+14 = 12 3 Average velocity: 10 / 12 = 0.83m/sec. - Wetted Perimeter: 9.5m - Cross sectional area: Width x Average depth Average depth: 0+0.32+0.20+0.16+0.16+0.22+0.27+0.38+0.25+0.20+0.13+0.05+0.23+0.25+0.21+0.12+0.07+0.02+0 19 = 0.17m 9 x 0.17 = 1.53m2 - Discharge: Cross sectional area x Velocity 1.53 x 0.83= 1.2852m 3/ sec - Hydraulic Radius: Cross sectional area Wetted Perimeter 1.53 / 9.5 = 0.161 = 0.16m Site 4: Foz de Lizandro Gradient: 0�. Distance from left bank (m) 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 11.76 Depth (m) 0.00 0.15 0.57 1.35 1.51 1.60 1.51 1.60 1.67 1.00 0.56 0.41 0.00 Time taken for float to travel 10 metres: Left bank 11 secs 10 secs 14 secs Middle 10 secs 10 secs 12 secs Right bank 12 secs 15 secs 13 secs Average time = 35/3 + 32/3 + 40/3 = 11.7 + 10.7 + 13.3 = 35.7 = 11.9 3 3 3 Average velocity: 10 / 11.9 = 0.84m ...read more.

Conclusion

It is for this reason that the halving pattern cannot be taken into consideration if we were predicting the gradient for other sites in other rivers. Nevertheless, the decrease in gradient along the river supports Bradshaw's theory. Essentially, the wetted perimeter means the perimeter of a cross sectional area that is covered with water. Although it is not included in the hypothesis, it however does not show to have any pattern at all. At first, the wetted perimeter shows a decreasing pattern along sites 1 to 2, as it decreases from 16.7 to 16.4 cm. But from sites 2 to 4, the wetted perimeter increases from 16.4cm to 950cm to 1425cm. It may be that the data for site 1 is incorrect and is supposed to be lower, in order to show an increasing pattern for the wetted perimeter from source to mouth. So, overall as stated in the hypothesis, the stream characteristics do change along the course of the river. It is also correct that they are all interconnected. As you can see from the results, the hypothesis stated in the beginning of the coursework is fully correct and the characteristics of Rio Lizandro meet accordingly with what Bradshaw's table shows, as seen in the results and calculations. Hence, stream characteristics all change along the course of the river and they are all interconnected in one way or another. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Hydrology & Fluvial Geomorphology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Hydrology & Fluvial Geomorphology essays

  1. Hydrology and Fluvial geomorphology. (Q&A)

    This material is then deposited on the inside of the meander, where it gradually builds up, making the inside of the bend shallower. A slip-off slope is usually formed here which is a gentle slope from the top of the bank into the river, composed of the deposited material.

  2. How does the Efficiency and Cross-Sectional Area of a River Change Down Stream?

    To work out the cross-sectional area I needed to times the depth by the width. For site one, the equation can be seen below: dw = csa 8.1 x 1.9 = csa Looking at the Bradshaw model, the cross-sectional area of the stream increases the closer it gets to the mouth.

  1. Geography Coursework: Epping Forest

    This type of graph was used because it is easy to see the shape and size of the channel so it is easier to compare the average channel size of each site. Hydraulic radius - the hydraulic radius increases at each site.

  2. 'To what extent does the River Lyn conform to the Bradshaw model of River ...

    Water was pushing against the rule, made it difficult to keep it vertical in the water, which could make the reading higher. 11/11/02 6, A, B, C Water + channel width Metre rules To see if it conforms to the Bradshaw model Measured with a measuring rule, or with string, which was then calculated.

  1. This project will study about the way the river Conwy in north Wales changes ...

    MEASUING THE SIZE OF THE STONE: 1) There are peaks, which result in slippery. 2) Marsh, bushes disturb us from picking stones. 3) There are some big rocks eventually we cannot carry and measure. How can I improved? a) Doing more samples b)

  2. My hypotheses are:The character of the course of the River Bollin will change along ...

    This occurred because the rocks suspended in the water are eroded by attrition as the rocks and other suspended particles strike the sides of the stream, as well as each other. Hypothesis In accordance with my prediction, the water velocity increased as we travelled downhill, it gained speed.

  1. Investigate change in river characteristics down stream.

    Such as the measuring of width with a tape measure is a good idea as I will be able to take the measurement from the bank more easily than if I was using meter rules and joining them together, which would have caused errors in the reading of results.

  2. The river Gwaun: Investigating how the course of the river changes from the source ...

    which makes the average width higher. This proves that the average depth is not a fair method of measurement because most of the widths in Site 4 were larger than those in Sites 2&3 and it only had a lower average because of the amount of results were over double

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work