• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and access the main reasons for the failure of the Italian revolutions due to poor leadership in the period of 1815 1831

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and access the main reasons for the failure of the revolutions due to poor leadership in the period of 1815 - 1831 The revolutions between 1815 and 1831 had a variety of factors that caused them to fail instead of succeed in this period of time. These revolts that took place in various states were mainly organised and founded by the middle class, they believed that revolts would ensure a change in government and the way in which these states were ruled. These secret societies formed in Italy to enhance the Italian way of life, they even schemed abroad in places such as London and Paris. However the main reasons for the failure of these results is due to the large proportion of people such as peasants and workers not supporting them well enough to have a large affect. The revolution could not be a social one due to the fact the middle class was such narrow part of the population and did not involve others. The lack of communication was a key issue due to the revolutions were all localised, the French revolt of 1830 gave the Italian societies a sense of hope that the French would support their needs in Italy. ...read more.

Middle

He kept his connection with the Carbonari by publishing books and pamphlets. Despite the efforts of the revolutions in Naples and Sicily, ultimately power was restored and the trade guilds were abolished as many revolutionaries were associated with being craftsmen. This prevented any future attempts of a revolt. It was relatively difficult for secret societies to get in contact in Italy after the revolts that occurred in Naples and Sicily. However many secret societies did manage to scheme revolutionary thoughts abroad particularly in London and Paris. The French revolution in 1830 raised the hopes of many Italian nationalists as they expected the French to assist them in their quest for unification. All these small rebellions did have a large affect on why the revolutions failed because they didn't get enough backing from other people in their state to have a large scale influence amongst the state. The revolt in Piedmont was influenced by secret societies such as the Carbonari, they pushed forward different demands. Victor Emmanuel had seen a return to power as King and the Carbonari wanted a constitutional monarchy which seemed to be their ultimate aim overall meaning the destruction of Austrian influence in Italy but this would require a revolution. ...read more.

Conclusion

Broad support for these revolutions did not exist. Secret societies were the main reasons for the revolts in the first place such as the Carbonari. Socially, the revolutions appeared narrow to the general public as only accounting for the middle classes dominantly such as in Naples the Carbonari made 5% of the male population which is a low amount. The secret societies aims were not social aims, but more constitutional and driving for a new power of government and extend their own classes power. I believe a main reason for the failure of the revolt was that it failed to attract foreign support for example the French revolutionaries did not aid the Italian cause due to the overwhelming Austrian control. In 1831 Louis Philippe, the French King, stated "We do not recognise the right of any people to force us to fight in its cause, the blood of Frenchmen belongs to France alone." This quote crushes the Italians hopes for unification. Comparing this lack of support to the fact the revolutions were all separate causes shows why the French failed to assist, Italians identifying themselves through their states rather than as their country as a whole only furthered the failure and showed Austria that they were weak when divided. The revolutions were unable to contend with the overwhelming forces of the Austrians. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Who was more responsible for the success of Italian Unification up to 1861? Cavour, ...

    Cavour provided them this, he naturally appealed to the people with his charismatic approach to the people. Cavour then went about implementing reforms, which he saw as necessary to happen if any unification was to happen. These were to improve the government system, improve the economy and receive foreign support.

  2. How far and why did the aims of the revolutionaries in France change during ...

    These began with Louis XVI's reluctancy to accept the reforms taking place in Paris. Louis responded to the Tennis Court Oath by sending military force into Paris in order to dissolve the National Assembly. He dissolved Necker at the height of his popularity, inspiring large-scale popular demonstrations against him.

  1. 'In the context of the period 1715-1815 to what extent were economic factors the ...

    However, it soon became clear that the clergy and nobility were still not interested in ceding any of their own influence, and all voting was organised such that each Estate had one vote. Thus, the numerical advantage the King had seemingly given the Third Estate did not exist in practice.

  2. How Far was the Failure of the 1848-9 Italian Revolutions Due to the Intervention ...

    This would not have happened if it wasn't for Austria's power and control over the states. Similarly in 1849, Austria kept their power over the Italian states. In the Papal States, the parliament met for the first time. Mazzini was welcomed back to Rome, and told to choose 2 people to run Rome with him.

  1. Why Did The Revolutions Of 1820-1831 In The Italian States Fail?

    It was hoped that the French might have provided military assistance after the uprisings of 1831, however this proved not to be the case. Help from abroad was hard to come by because as Austria were a prominent empire at the time, it was extremely unlikely they would end up on the defeated side of a battle.

  2. To what extent was Austria responsible for the failure of Italian revolutionaries in the ...

    In the 1831-2 revolutions, Austria suppressed uprisings in Modena, Parma and the Papal States. The provisional government established by students in Modena and Parma, forcing the abdication of Ruler, Duchess Maria-Louise of Parma was quickly restored to pre-1831 rule as Duke Frances of Modena returned at the head of the Austrian army.

  1. Why did the early revolutions fail to unite Italy?

    Thirty Carbonari members advanced on the town of Avellino and a widespread uprising took place. General Guglielmo Pepe led more infantry and two cavalry regiments to join the Carbonari, showing that more than one person thought they were leading the revolution and that there was no clear leader for the people of Piedmont to follow.

  2. How significant was foreign influence in shaping Italian political and social development in the ...

    impact on the Italian middle classes, spurring political groups to take action. His heading of the Roman Republic gave Italians a taste of what Italy could be like if it wasn't ruled by absolutist foreigners or the pope. Equally, the Mazzinian 'Young Italy' founded in 1831 would aid in the creation of Italian national heroes such as Garibaldi.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work