• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why Did The Revolutions Of 1820-1831 In The Italian States Fail?

Extracts from this document...


Why Did The Revolutions Of 1820-1831 Fail? The year 1815 saw the restoration of the monarchy in the Italian states. This was met with great dissatisfaction by a high amount of middle class citizens, who saw this reactionary revert to pre-Napoleonic times as restricting and unfavourable, as during the French Rule, all were equal in the eye of the law, and had more freedom through a fairer system. This led to the foundation of revolutionary organizations, most notably the Adelfi, Carbonari and the Italian Federation. Their desires were to eliminate Austrian influence and unify the Italian states as one. There were then revolutions in Naples (1820), Sicily (1820), Piedmont (1821) and Modena, Parma & Papal States (1831). However, these failed due to a number of reasons, and these will be looked at in the course of this essay. One significant reason for these failures was the constant intervention of Austria and Klemens von Metternich. Metternich dominated European foreign policy and opposed any kind of revolution. For example, he was shocked that the Neapolitan revolution in 1821 was proving to be a success, and considered it to be disturbing. Therefore, he took measures to suppress these events at every opportunity. ...read more.


As well as that, Austria would not have looked upon the country that had assisted the Italian states favourably, so for a country such as France, it would only be creating problems that they did not need. Not only were foreign countries unwilling to contribute to rebellions: Because revolutions were often a local affair to rise against circumstantial and distinctive issues (for example, King Ferdinand I increasing the Church's power to censor challenging literature in Naples in 1818), it was a concern of that state and that state only - And as other neighbouring states were unaffected by these issues, they saw no reason to intervene. After all, different states had concerns of their own. An example of this would be the revolution of Modena in 1831, where Bologna refused to send help - they were suffering through the Papal restoration during this time. This prevented Modena from having the strength and resources to succeed in their attempt at a revolution. While revolutionary organizations struggled to attract co-operation between bordering states, the organizations themselves had trouble in concerns to the amount of people involved in rebellions. Less than ten percent of the population were involved in these groups, the most popular of which was the Carbonari. ...read more.


This arguably resulted in a lesser degree of commitment and therefore, not enough effort was made to make some revolutions successful. After addressing all of the factors in how the revolutions of 1820-1831 were unsuccessful, I can come to a conclusion on what I believe were the most significant. There were minor problems, such as fear of a "Mob Rule" and the lack of leadership, greater problems, such as the co-operation of organizations, the lack of support and absence of foreign assistance, and significant complications, like the government's insufficient military resources, and Austrian intervention and influence, particularly that of Metternich. In conclusion, I believe that Austria was the clearest reason for the failure of the revolutions. Firstly, they had control over the Italian states. They were states for a reason - to fragment organizations such as the Carbonari and the Adelfi and keep them weak to prevent outbursts of rebellion. Secondly, it did not matter if a revolution was beginning to look like it could end successfully. The monarch of the state (for example Ferdinand I or Victor Emmanuel I) had the authority to allow Austria and Metternich to intervene wherever necessary to quell the threat of an uprising. Finally, the Austrian empire was powerful and the Italian revolutionists had no chance of fighting against this if intervention had been called for. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Compare and access the main reasons for the failure of the Italian revolutions due ...

    This had a negative affect on the middle class who felt freedom of speech and expression was become more and more limited. The King was having economic problems with his lack of money; he decided to cut public spending with things such as improving the harbours, halting projects such as

  2. Why did the 1848 revolutions in italy fail?

    The liberals did not want to encourage popular support or peasant involvement as they saw politics as something only for the middle classes. The Revolutionaries were not interested with social reform or improving life for ordinary people, therefore the majority of peasants did not get involved.

  1. Hitler and the Secret Societies.

    One should be cautious about the thesis that the name Thule is a serious and conscious reference to a Nordic, Polar connection, in the effort to make a connection with the Hyperborean origins of the Indo-Germans--since Thule appears in ancient tradition as the sacred center or sacred island in the uttermost North.

  2. Why did the early revolutions fail to unite Italy?

    Another example of the power of Austria was in Piedmont. After the news of Naples reached the liberals in Piedmont a revolutionary government run by the Carbonari was set up in the town of Alessandria. An army mutiny in Turin force Emmanuel to abdicate.

  1. 1798 Irish Rebellion notes

    By late 1797 most of its leaders had either been arrested or had fled abroad. Among their followers the long months of delay had seriously damaged morale just at the time when military counter-measures, now more overtly Orange than ever, were heightening religious tensions as the yeomanry briskly burned

  2. How significant was foreign influence in shaping Italian political and social development in the ...

    As David Kertzer conveys, "the election of Pius IX had, in particular, been welcomed by those liberal Catholics who sought to reconcile Italian independence with loyalty to the Church,"[9] creating a generation of Neo-Guelfs. Pius gave freedom to the press, created a civil guard and set up a Consulta, a state council which non-churchmen could belong to.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work