• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that WW1 was mainly responsible for the February Revolution of 1917?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Angus Gavan McHarg How far do you agree that WW1 was mainly responsible for the February Revolution of 1917? World War 1 contributed greatly towards the February Revolution of 1917, but was not solely responsible for the revolution or the downfall of the Romanov Dynasty. Poor military tactics, organisation and a loss of faith in authority were the main wartime causes of the revolution. The Tsars incompetent and indecisive nature easily helped the Russian people and opposition groups to question his leadership. There were strikes over food shortages, poor working conditions, and wages. The lack of social and political reform as promised in 1905 provoked further demonstrations that spiralled out of the governments control by 1917. World War 1, along with these other factors, seemed to be the extra weight that would doom Russian autocracy. Russia?s contribution to the First World War displayed how backwards their military organisation, tactics and leadership was. Nicholas II?s poor leadership skills lead him to make one of his most disastrous decisions, to take control of the army. By the end of 1915 the Russian army had experienced some crushing defeats at the hands of the Germans. ...read more.

Middle

These government changes removed competent men from power, disorganised the work of the government and created further political instability. During her ?reign? exaggerated suspicion grew that she was a spy for the Germans, as she was originally German. The dismantlement of government organisation also put Rasputin, the unorthodox monk peasant from Siberia, under great criticism. Rumours spread that Alexandria and Rasputin were having an affair and that Rasputin had complete control over the Tsar and Tsarina. However in reality, the Tsarina believed that Rasputin was able to heal many of Alexei?s (the Tsarovich) worst symptoms as a haemophiliac. The deterioration of the Russian government under the rule of the Tsarina provoked a growth of discontent, political opposition and a lack of support from the Duma. The rumours about Rasputin and scandal within the government being true or untrue was irrelevant, these rumours undermined the authority of the government and made the Tsar appear weak. Reputation was more important than reality. As the reputations of the Tsar and Tsarina decayed during the war the rumours of ?German spies? and ?sex scandals? were able to mobilize an angry mob against a suspected corrupt autocratic system, which is what happened in February 1917. ...read more.

Conclusion

the Tsar continued to impose political oppression, this inevitably lead to a growth in opposition. Life was still incredibly harsh for millions of Russian?s but there was no sudden burst of united anger against the government to trigger a revolution like in 1905. Instead a long, drawn-out and disastrous war would be the key to the next uprising. The disaster of World War 1was mainly responsible for the arrival of the February Revolution. The war consisted of shambles after shambles, especially on the part of the government, that was able to unite the Russian people against the Tsar and his autocracy. Constant military defeats, continuous military retreats and inevitable desertion by thousands of soldiers drained all hope of victory under the current regime. Russia suffered hugely from the strain that World War 1 put on the economy and social lives of the Russian people. However, the Russian people, especially peasants, had always experienced social and economic hardship under the Tsar?s regime. The First World War was able to worsen these daily hardships to the point where social unrest and discontent turned to action and violence in February 1917. A revolution in Russia was adamant, but the handling of and decisions made during World War 1by the Tsar, the royals and the government drove the revolution right to their doorstep. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How far was the First World War the main cause of the fall of ...

    Furthermore, his lack of political knowledge made his instincts favour suppression instead of negotiation, shown in the vicious suppression of the Industrial Workers in the 1905 'Revolution', creating years of resentment from that particular class as it seemed that everyone else became better off as a result of 1905.

  2. To what extent were the actions of Tsar Nicholas II during the First World ...

    In both cases war was the major factor in catalyzing discontent. The war led to Russia suffering many economic problems. Government spending on the war increased from 4 to 30 million rubles from 1914 to 1917. Russia was forced to abandon the gold standard as they borrowed money from other countries and printed more money to finance the war.

  1. Propaganda in WW1

    which was also used to advertise and promote a range of events such as silent movies. The messages were often bold and immediate to catch people's attention, and they tended to promote a single message. They used text in combination with a visual image to appeal to a broader audience.

  2. Rasputin had such an influence over the Tsar and Tsaritsa because the Tsarevich suffered ...

    The Russians had no weapons to use, they were told to pick up the gun from the man in front of them. They were made to go otherwise they would be shot by their superiors, also I think most of them thought that death would be a lot better.

  1. How far was the First World War responsible for the downfall of the Romanovs ...

    as a result Hunger and Famine were a constant reality of for Russian people during the war. Furthermore transport broke down under stress war and caused major food shortages. The growth in railway between 1881 to1941 was an impressive achievement but didn't meet the demands of war and the transport

  2. To what extent was Nicholas II responsible for the outbreak of the revolution in ...

    Firstly, he had decided to take Russia into war. Even though, Russia did well during the early stages, they suffered greatly resulting in the greatest number casualties of the Great War. As the war was progressing, Nicholas II decided to go to the frontlines and take control of the strategy and warfare in his hands.

  1. Evaluate the significance of the use of tanks had in the outcome of WW1

    They would ?...tie several grenades together and make them explode beneath the tanks.?[12] They had now found methods to counter-attack. Some Historians criticised Haig for throwing away the tanks psychological effect on the battlefield by using them prematurely, therefore, allowing the enemy to detect its weaknesses.

  2. Lenins leadership was the main reason for the success of the Bolshevik Revolution in ...

    meant they lost support amongst the peasants and the industrial workers, which ultimately contributed significantly to the success of the Bolsheviks. The government failed to carry out land redistribution following the February Revolution, consequently they became deeply resented and many peasants seized the property of local landlords.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work