• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How significant was Bismarck in securing the unification of Germany 1862-71?Bismarck's significance in securing the unification of Germany can be measured by looking at his individual role

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

AS Coursework How significant was Bismarck in securing the unification of Germany 1862-71? Bismarck's significance in securing the unification of Germany can be measured by looking at his individual role and all other factors that contributed to unification. Through his influence over King William, his control over the media and the people of Prussia, and his engineering of the famous Ems telegram there is no doubt that Bismarck had an enormous part to play in German unification. However, other factors such as the fortunate international situation, strength of Prussia (economically & militarily), increasing nationalism, and the decline of Austria show that Bismarck was in no way the sole contributing factor as to why German unification occurred. My view is that because of the existing forces for unification, Bismarck's role can be limited to how much he manipulated the main driving forces for an arguably inevitable unification. With the ever-changing international situation, it can be safely said that Bismarck never had complete control over the events securing the unification of Germany. With Austrian power open to question after her defeat in Italy, Bismarck's aim for Prussian expansion came at a perfect time when Austria's power was declining and Prussia's was on the rise. In August 1863, when the Austrian emperor called all the German princes to a congress at Frankfurt, to discuss a possible loose unification, Prussia was nearly lured into unity. ...read more.

Middle

This is a clear showcase of Bismarck preparing the way internationally, and due to the strength of Prussia militarily and Bismarck's aggressive statesmanship the North German confederation was formed. He had succeeded in uniting a large part of Germany under a Prussian Monarchy through force of arms. Bismarck is very significant here in the type and timing of unification. Perhaps Bismarck's most significant role towards securing the unification of Germany was his tactical manoeuvring in the summer of 1870. With Napoleon seeking territory on the West bank of the Rhine. Bismarck was able to use his demands to pressurise the south German states into signing secret military alliances with the North German Confederation. Effectively Bismarck had set the base for political unification by integrating the militaries of the North & South of Germany. With France isolated, war with Prussia was looking like a very distinct possibility. The event which turned out to be the spark for the Franco-Prussian war was the engineering of the Ems Telegram by Bismarck. When a demand was made to Prince Leopold (a relative of King William of Prussia), the French decided this was unacceptable. Fearing that it would place a Prussian puppet on the throne of their southern neighbour and this would further shift the balance of power in Europe to Frances disadvantage, Napoleon demanded assurances from William that he would never accept the candidacy. ...read more.

Conclusion

Although Bismarck influenced many situations, there are many examples where he relied on luck and chance. The Polish revolt is a clear example where Bismarck was reacting to events rather than controlling them. Due to sheer luck, after the Polish revolt a coalition between France-Austria-Russia was now unlikely, meaning these 3 threats to German unification could not work together. Another example of luck was the marginalisation of Russia. With Russia being such a potentially powerful country and a major power in Europe, if they had a strong economy and a stable social position, it is safe to say they would have prevented Prussia expanding and ultimately German unification. There is no doubt that Bismarck had a huge part to play in German Unification. This is obvious through his aggressive statesmanship, and his excellent political manoeuvring in such instances as the Austro-Prussian war, the Schleswig-Holstein affair, and the Hohenzollern Candidacy the result of which was the Franco-Prussian war which ultimately led to German Unification on 18th January 1871. However, Bismarck's significance can be measured by looking at certain circumstances surrounding German Unification. It can be said that Prussian strengths both militarily and economically coupled with a fortunate international situation meant that the foundations for some sort of unification were already set. Through his utilisation of Prussian strengths in the Austro-Prussian and Franco-Prussian wars, his pragmatic approach, strong conviction and excellent diplomatic skills, Bismarck merely solidified the cause of German Unification in its final form and timing (under Prussia). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. To what extent was the contribution of Bismarck to German unification the most important ...

    The federation was dominated by Prussia and Bismarck. This political movement helped Germany unite and work as one strong unit. France gained territory through the Austria-Prussian but they attempted to get more than they were originally promised, Prussia refused them any more land.

  2. Why did Prussia rather than Austria lead the unification of Germany?

    Russia was trying to expand her interests in the Ottoman Empire to the strong disapproval of Britain and France; and despite a tradition of cooperation with one another, Austria showed open hostility by mobilising her army along the Danube. In this way Austria lost her most powerful and consistent ally,

  1. To what extent was German Unification driven by primarily economic forces?

    Austria did not join the Zollverein in 1834 because she wished to protect her economy from cheap foreign products and this protectionist attitude was not compatible with the aims of the Zollverein. By not being a member of the Zollverein, Austria misses out on revenue that could have been gained if she were a member.

  2. Assess the view that the failures of the Congress of Vienna outweighed the successes.

    contended that the peacemakers at Vienna failed because they created a system relying too heavily on themselves to enforce it, and assumed their continuing desire to work together. Britain, having avoided any continental entanglements in 1814-15 was to grow increasingly independent over the following years, and less inclined to cooperate

  1. To what extent should Bismarck receive credit for the unification of Germany?

    This was to reduce Napoleon III's suspicion. However, the division between the northern German states and the southern German states was not the final aim of Bismarck, his goal was for the whole of Germany to unify under the leadership of the Prussian King.

  2. Compare and contrast the situation in Italy 1919-22 with that in Germany 1919-29.

    The war left the Germans with the worst end of the deal. This meant that the German politicians were faced with the much harder task than their Italian counterparts. The fact that Stresemann managed to control the situation create a better Germany in terms of economy, jobs and so on

  1. To what extent did the unification of Germany depend upon "the strengths of the ...

    This meant that Prussia had influence in the German states and Austria, were cut-off. It was at this point that the Austrian delegate to the assembly of the confederation remarked, "Prussia is now taking over the actual leadership of Germany's policy, Austria's leadership being merely formal" although, at this time Austria still had political influence.

  2. Why did the war against Austria in 1859 result in the unification of most ...

    After Garibaldi's success in Naples and Sicily, Cavour was nervous that a similar attack on Rome, as Garibaldi intended, would cause great difficulties for both France and Piedmont.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work