• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful were the domestic reforms of Wolsey in the years 1515 to 1529? (24 marks)

Extracts from this document...


How successful were the domestic reforms of Wolsey in the years 1515 to 1529? (24 marks) During the fourteen-year period of Wolsey being chancellor (1515 to 1529), Wolsey proved to be a considerable influence over Henry VIII's domestic policy. Wolsey was involved in economic, legal, aristocratic and church affairs. Overall Wolsey's domestic policy was relatively successful however it did have some major failures. Wolsey was no domestic reformer in any modern political sense and he saw his prime duty as Lord Chancellor. One area in which Wolsey is seen as having a great impact on is legal reform. Wolsey was keen to make it clear that no one was above the law and that the law was applicable to all so the wealthy/powerful could not escape. Wolsey was genuinely concerned to improve the administration of the law and increase the reputation of the crown as the ?fount of justice?. A successful was that in 1516 Wolsey put forward a scheme to improve the whole legal system, the power of the court of the Star Chamber was to be increased and ordinary subject were to file their own cases in Chancery and Star Chamber. ...read more.


Subsidy was not a yearly tax; it was therefore only used when needed. Wolsey used this new tax a total number of four times. From 1513-1516, subsidy raised £170,000, whereas three yearly fifteenths and tenths raised a mere £90,000. This therefore shows how Wolsey managed to raise a huge amount of finance which Henry VIII needed for his consist wars and battles. However as the constant strain of needing money continued, Wolsey made a grave mistake, which could be seen as his first downfall as Lord Chancellor. Resistance to Wolsey’s demands had been growing and the “Amicable Grant” (1525) was the final straw. This new tax provoked taxpayer’s to strike and even created the threat of an open rebellion in Suffolk. Henry’s faith in Wolsey was hugely decreased after this. John Guy and David Loades “acknowledge Wolsey's abilities but are less effusive in their praise and see his own deficiencies as responsible for the failure of some of the reforms he embarked on.” Another domestic policy Wolsey was involved in was relations with Parliament. ...read more.


To resolve this in 1517, Wolsey launched a national enquiry into how effective previous legislation had been. He found evidence against 264 landlords and corporations. Also Wolsey was earnest in his determination to reserve some of the enclosures. This view is displayed by Peter Gwyn as he sees Wolsey as a man of "enormous ability and unstoppable determination" with a huge capacity for hard work and whose reforms were limited because of the ambitions of Henry in Europe. Wolsey failed in enclosure and profiteering however as he was often too busy to deal with some cases and no long term improvements in prices were made. Additionally he raised suspicions that he campaigned against enclosure only to provoke and weaken his wealthy opponents who were profiting from enclosure. In conclusion Wolsey was hugely successful in Domestic reforms as he excellent control over financial management and managed to supply Henry VIII with enough money for his involvement in wars. However overall Wolsey failed in domestic reforms as his introduction of the Amicable Grant undid all of his successes in Henry?s eyes. Which therefore lead to Henry losing trust in Wolsey. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    'In His Domestic Policy Between 1515 and 1529 Wolsey Promised Much But Achieved Little' ...

    4 star(s)

    The nobles didn't like Wolsey at all, and it can be said that they resented him, because of his low origin, and massive rise to power. There are 2 ideas of Wolsey and the Nobles' relationship; the old idea, and the new idea.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    How successful was Wolsey in his Domestic Administration 1515-29?

    4 star(s)

    He articulated his reform ideas to Henry so eloquently and Henry was fascinated by these reforms. Wolsey used this time to fix problems that had arisen. His reforms were a fa�ade for his vulnerabilities. We could say that Wolsey promised much with reform and delivered little.

  1. Examine the Degree to which Wolsey was responsible for his own downfall

    His show of his wealth led to his fall; he cause resentment between the upper nobility. As Randell explains Wolsey was the son of a butcher and "from these lowly origins he defied all the rules of social mobility by becoming the richest and most powerful man in England besides the King."

  2. To what extent did Wolsey seek to reform the church? Although Wolsey did have ...

    London was extremely anti-clerical and this was demonstrated when a London merchant Richard Hunne had been accused of heresy after a quarrel with his parish priest over a mortuary payment, and was then found dead in the local bishop's prison.

  1. Nell Gwyn (Playhouse Cretaures) essay

    Nell answered then, "I was but one man's whore, though I was brought up in a bawdy-house to fill strong waters to the guests; and you are a whore to three or four, though a Presbyter's praying daughter!" which was very pretty.[5] It is not out of the question that

  2. With what success did Wolsey carry through his domestic reforms in the period up ...

    This suggests that Wolsey tried to maintain sole influence over the King. I think that because Henry wasn't a great deal interested, Wolsey had a better chance of success and having had the power to persuade the king also helped him to succeed.

  1. How successful were Peels social and economic reforms between 1841 and 1846?

    The effectiveness of these policies also came into question. On the surface, they seemed very beneficial to the poor and represented a big step from the past ?horrors? of the workplace. But information such as the fact that the average life of Liverpudlian labourers had been 15 and wages did not rise in industry between 1825 and1850 show that

  2. How successful was Wolsey as Lord Chancellor?

    However, the dire situation eventually proved to also be his undoing, and the move towards a French alliance and the Amicable Grant proved to be a failure, marking his departure from successes in foreign policy. Therefore, Wolsey was relatively successful as Lord Chancellor in his role residing over Henry?s ambitious foreign policy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work