• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Arab-Israeli conflict.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Modern World Assignment-The Arab-Israeli conflict: History Coursework. 1) How did the village of Deir Yassin come to be fought over in 1948, and why do sources A and B differ about who was to blame for the Arab flight from the village and other parts of Palestine at this time? On the 14th May 1948, British troops left Palestine. Soon after, on the 9th April 1948 a Zionist force, which included fighters from Irgun, The Stern Gang and the embryonic Israeli army Haganah, attacked the Palestinian Arab village of Deir Yassin. 154 men, women and children were killed during the attack. The Arabs think that the Jews attacked Deir Yassin in order to frighten the inhabitants into leaving, so that their homes and land could be used for new Jewish settlers. The Arabs also take the view that the Jews attacked Deir Yassin in order to make an example out of it: to frighten people into leaving their homes so as to avoid the same fate. However the Jews say that the attack on Deir Yassin was part of Operation Nachshon. The aim of which, was to open up the road to Jerusalem. ...read more.

Middle

Source A is a Palestinian view of the Arab exodus from Palestine in 1948. It is an extract from a pamphlet written by the PLO in 1984. It blames the Israeli attack on Deir Yassin for the Arabs leaving their homes and becoming refugees. It says the attack frightened the 'Palestinian population into leaving to avoid the same fate, which they did in there thousands.' This source is biased because it only gives the Palestinian point of view, therefore it does not allow us to come to a firm conclusion about the refugee problem. This source only partially explains the Arab exodus because from my own knowledge I know that, just four days after the reports about Deir Yassin were published, Arab forces ambushed a Jewish convoy on the way to Hadassah Hospital, killing 77 Jews, including doctors, nurses, patients, and the director of the hospital. Another 23 people were injured. If the Arabs were all so scared surely no revenge attack would have been carried out? Source B is an Israeli view of the same event as source A. It was taken from a statement by Mrs Golda Meir (the Israeli foreign ambassador) ...read more.

Conclusion

Sources C and D contradict each other and both giving only 'one side of the story.' Like source C, source D is biased and so again no firm conclusion can be drawn from this source. Source F is a photograph showing a Palestinian demonstration. The photo shows two women, a Palestinian and a Jew, holding banners demonstrating about their rights to live in Palestine. One banner says, 'I am a Palestinian Arab. I was born in Jerusalem. Palestine is my homeland. But I cannot return there.' The other banner says, 'I am an American Jew. I was born in U.S.A. Israel is not my homeland. But I can "return" there. The picture was taken outside the Israeli embassy in December1973. The information given tells us that the same two women were photographed in 1993 carrying the exact same banners. As well as giving the view of an Arab, it also gives us the view of an American Jew. This shows us that not all Jews agree with the Jewish handling of the refugee problem. Although it is unreliable because it only gives one point of view, it does show us that in 20 years nothing has changed. The two women are still carrying the same banners as they were 20 years ago. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Both sides were merely pursuing their legitimate interests. This was the crux-and the tragedy-of ...

    The exacerbation of the conflict in the June War of 1967 was again one of both sides pursuing their own legitimate interests, spiraling from the proclamation of the state of Israel in 1948. The involvement of the superpowers made the dispute more complicated and the Soviet backing of the Arab states gave impetus to Arab plans of eliminating Israel.

  2. Contemporary Status of Arab Americans

    Many of the people wearing these garments believe in the "American way" and are often thought of as terrorists. According to Scheafer (2002), a national survey found that "over 40 percent of Americans view Muslims as supporting terrorism and the majority see them as suppressing women" (pg.

  1. Preserving Arab Identity in the Process of Globalization

    its innate ingenuity will find a way to modify and mold them until it will create, after the example of "Arab socialism," a special Arab subvariety of the new sexuality.4 The most immediate threat to Arab sexual mores concerns this very issue- that pernicious cultural imperialism from the West will take over.

  2. The Arab-Israeli conflict 1956, 1967 and 1973.

    After an Israeli tractor ploughed Syrian land and was opened fire on to, the Israelis' air force bombed the Syrian guns and shot down six Syrian fighter planes sent to attack them. The USSR, being a close ally of the Arabs and Syria in particular, stepped in when Israel threatened

  1. American History.

    commercial policies there was economic warfare between the states, which was the last thing merchants needed. - The weakness of the nat'l gov't also affected foreign trade, as the AOC denied Congress the power to establish a nat'l commercial policy.

  2. The Arab Israeli Conflict -

    it will guarantee freedom of religion, conscience, language, education and culture; it will safeguard the Holy Places of all religions; and it will be faithful to the principles of the Charter of the United Nations." This promise of a homeland would drive hundreds and thousands of Jewish Refugees into the

  1. Battle Analysis - Dong Ap Bia (Hamburger Hill).

    The maneuvered against the force and killed three NVA. The battalion called in the ARA and artillery fire in order to dislodge the enemy from his fortified position. The enemy held fast, however, and throughout the day the 3-187th received heavy automatic weapons and RPG fire and limited mortar fire.

  2. The Arab Israeli Conflict - source related study.

    This cartoon suggests that there was trouble 'brewing´┐Ż in the Middle East but that both USA and USSR contributed to concocting the troubles and used the Middle East to show their power and influence. However the fact that the source is a cartoon means that their actual influences and role

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work