• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Arab Israeli conflict.

Extracts from this document...


Arab Israeli conflict By Sara Booker On October 3rd 2000, the observer reported that "violence raged across Gaza, the west Bank and Israel itself yesterday, unchecked by international appeals for calm, and fuelled by a steadily rising death toll, which last night had reached at least 47 in 5 days. Seven years after the Oslo accords, the already dying peace negotiations appeared to be over". The situation has not improved since October 2000 and violence continues to the present day. Source A is a reliable source. It has been written from a Palestinian point of view, about how Palestinians feel about the conditions they have been forced to live in. It tells you that the Palestinians are angry with the appalling economic conditions they have been made to live, nothing has happened to make the conditions better, even though people have talked about making it better. They are feed up with the slow pace the peace process is taking. The source is saying the problems lie deeper than the small things which set off the intifada, it's a built up provocation of years of anger which is set off with something small. ...read more.


They are saying that they had lived peacefully in their homes, then along came strangers from across the sea and got forced out of there homes, they understand that some of these people have been victims of European terror, but most are pawns in political movement. It is also saying that the only Jews that should claim ownership are the people who were born in Israel. Source D is also about refugees this is a timeline which shows when all the wars are and when all the key advents were for example the first intifada but this source doesn't explain why it happened. It has been written in a factual way and an easy way to understand the facts. It tells us why there are so many refugees in the Middle East and how all the problems started. Terrorism is also one of the main problems affecting the peace process until Terrorism and Extremism stops the Palestinians and Israelis will never live happily at peace with each other. Terrorism is a problem today because they never know when a car bomb will go off, recently terrorists have blown up buses killing innocent people and suicide bombers have blown themselves up at check points. ...read more.


Most of the sources I have looked at are only from a Palestinian Arab point of view and none of the sources are from an Israeli Jews point of view this means a serious weakness in my essay. Until the factors are sorted out there will never be peace in the middle east but for peace one side will have to give up there right to the land which neither the Palestinians or Israelis will do in the long term. I think it was wrong in the first place for the UN to give the Israelis a country which was already occupied by people; it was never going to make the people who were already living there happy. I do agree though that the Jews needed a county of there own because after the world war there was a lot of Anti-Semitism and prejudice against them still. But for the Palestinians they had to be forced out of there homes to be refugees while these other people from around the world took over there country and homes. Which source C states, it reflects the problem that was created when strangers forced Palestinians from there homes. Which I don't agree is right; it's like someone giving England to some country who occupied it thousands of years ago. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Middle east section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Middle east essays

  1. History Coursework: The Arab-Israeli Conflict

    It is also most likely to be biased and the citizen has been brought up with this view and never considered or possibly known any other view. From my own knowledge, I know that the intifada had just ended after an attempted peace agreement.

  2. Can terrorism ever be a legitimate and effective means of pursuing political goals?

    However, there have been groups throughout history that although have used terrorist methods, have been fighting against harsh regimes and dictatorships. This however leads to the question, can there really be mitigating circumstances for perpetrating acts of terrorism? When looking for harsh, oppressive regimes, Britain is not one of the first countries that spring to mind.

  1. Assess the effectiveness of the Arab and Israeli peace initiatives from the 1970s to ...

    THE MADRID CONFERENCE, 1991 Following the Gulf War, President Bush Senior was determined to take advantage of America's pre-eminent position in the world and impose a peace on the Middle East. This was due to the collapse of the Soviet Union and its inability to counter the US.

  2. Terrorism. What is terrorism? 2. Why do terrorists ...

    Another example is the Tiananmen Square protests, the protestors did not use terrorism but they did make the government use terrorism which alienated the government from its people. Terrorism has been used to achieve a short term aim such as the release of terrorists from their group being held as prisoners, perhaps by taking hostages.

  1. Question 2 - What factors lead to the breakdown of the 1993 Israeli-Palestinian Peace ...

    This event lead to the biggest worry over security since the 1948 war. A wave of suicide bombings in December of that year claimed many lives, with HAMAS claiming responsibility. One suicide bombing occurred in a busy mall outside a caf´┐Ż with large crowds of mostly young people.

  2. Arab and Israeli conflict - source related study.

    The nature and the way it was written was to tell convey an idea that the Arabs were fighting for no persuasive cause. When looking at a source written by a Palestinian he interprets "All that we got was charity and humiliation while other continued to live in our homes"

  1. The Lebanon Civil War: Syria’s Role in Lebanon

    Throughout the Sarkis administration various shifts were occurred in domestic politics. His Prime Minister was unable to form a national government. And the inability of the Lebanese Army to maintain any effective control over the country was a major factor contributing to the weakness of the Lebanese government.

  2. Arab-Israeli conflict

    Therefore, they may slow down in their spending and make up for this by not fighting and therefore not needing money for the military. As Israel is in such a state it means that they are losing out on allot of money that could come in via tourism.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work