• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Effectiveness and Democratic Legitimacy: An Investigation of the European Democratic Deficit

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

MARTIN FEDERICO MEYER ritics argue that European governance suffers from a democratic deficit which needs to be overcome to ensure legitimacy. However, Europe lacking a demos, full democratization is unfeasible and undesirable since it would reduce system effectiveness. European governance will have to rely more on efficiency than on participation due to the same effects that partially caused integration, namely globalization. Output legitimacy will be the new basis of democracy. However, input legitimacy cannot be totally disregarded; it needs to be determined how much and when democratic means are necessary. The EU still must come up with reforms such as enhancing public discourses. GLOBALIZATION or, as some political scientists prefer calling it, denationalization is affecting all sectors of society, from the economic to the political. Whilst most people tend to consider this phenomenon as "a good thing," it also brings about several challenges. This paper aims at investigating those posed to one specific field, namely to the notion of democracy as effective collective self-determination, given that national political systems loose their autonomy to reach certain political goals as their options are directly influenced by the decisions taken by other states. To some extent, European integration was a collective effort of national states to cope with these challenges of globalization. But whilst integration made effectiveness (output legitimacy) easier to achieve, democratic input (input legitimacy) became more difficult. This has lead to the wide-hypothesized assumption that the European Union (EU) suffers from a democratic deficit that undermines the well-functioning of legitimate democracy. However, I will argue that due to the lack of a European demos, full democratization is not only impossible to achieve, but also undesirable since it would reduce system effectiveness necessary to cope with the challenges posed by globalization. ...read more.

Middle

A New Form of Democracy The lack of a European demos mentioned above should have made clear that full-fledged input legitimacy is unrealistic at the European level. But whilst the EU will increase input problems, at the same time it will decrease problems of output. Effectiveness will have to come at a democratic cost. This is very much in line with the democratic dilemma pointed out by Dahl - system effectiveness beyond the nation-sate runs counter to citizen participation. But Dahl also argues that we are witnessing a third transformation of democracy from territorial states to multi-level systems. The implication is that just as democracy on the scale of national states required new patterns of political institutions radically different from those of the small scale city-states, democracy on a transnational scale will similarly require new sets of institutions sometimes radically different from those of the familiar political institutions in modern representative democracies. (Dahl, 1994, 27) Dahl's argument appears inherently convincing and could help explain why filling the democratic gap with elements found at the national level is a wrong approach. Since the European Union is not a state, its institutions ought not to be assessed on the basis of those found in the member states. Merely transferring those institutions from the national to the European level would not make the EU more democratic or legitimate. One should rather look if a new form of democracy could come to exist and how this form of democracy could operate differently from that within the nation-states. As the notion of input legitimacy is under direct constrain from external economic and institutional factors, this new form of democracy would inevitably have to depend on output legitimacy. ...read more.

Conclusion

Many would question how such a deliberative system could function since a European public sphere is partly missing. However, several authors have commented that creation of a public sphere is not an intangible idea, for instance, due to the emergence of "new European audio-visual spaces - newspapers, television, internet, and English maybe as a bound to be first language - and the new social movements, NGOs and identity politics across borders." (Eriksen, 2000, 55) Especially the Internet provides several possibilities since network media might facilitate community-building and mobilization for civic engagement, and electronic discussion fora could help develop and clarify arguments. Conclusion The democratic deficit in the European Union is not a mere postulation, it is indeed present. However, I have argued that since Europe is characterized by the absence of a demos, "filling" this gap completely would be impossible and also undesirable. But the democratic deficit should not be seen as the end of the legitimacy of European governance. A new form of democracy must come to be understood, one deriving its legitimacy primarily from efficiency rather than from democratic participation. This will be intrinsically significant for dealing with the several challenges posed by globalization. Nonetheless, if the European Union does not want to completely alienate itself from the 360 million citizens it governs, some degree of public participation must be ensured. I have argued that enhancing public discourse is the most plausible solution. This proposal would not intend to completely reform the European institutions, but make European policy more transparent and relevant to the citizenry, and incorporate it in the decision-making process. If this can be achieved, European governance could then for the first time truly be considered effective and legitimate. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    ‘The main democratic deficit in the European Union is psychological, not institutional.’ Discuss.

    4 star(s)

    Since there are competing interests within the EU, with variable amounts of power, decisional outcomes inevitably derive from compromise. This is undemocratic since it gives power to those with money and the ability to employ efficient lobbying techniques. Secondly, Nugent asserted the political elite model that highlights the concentration of power at official and political levels.

  2. To What Extent Does the EU Display a 'Democratic Deficit'?

    Furthermore, there are significant problems with elections to the EU that challenge the view that they are truly democratic (in the sense of a liberal democracy). Firstly, the turnout to European Parliament elections is particularly low. This means that the mandate of the Parliament could be called into question, seeing

  1. The Institution of the European Union and Theories.

    Working Hours The Social Policy has also set the number of hours an employee can work in a week. Working time directive, Employees to work no more than 48 hours per week averaged over a 12 week period. This makes it harder to operate annualised hours arrangements.

  2. The Cult Phenomenon

    When fraudulent and abusive dimensions of the group are discovered, cult members are often devastated and seek treatment with a variety of concerns?if they can escape. And escaping is very, very difficult indeed. While this may sound a bit overstated, it is not.

  1. How important is the European Parliament?

    Rory Bremner, famous political satirist, said, "People hunger for energy and passion in their politicians. All we have at present are weary bureaucrats": MEPs sit in a semi-circle so heated "energy and passion" does not happen as much as it perhaps ought to especially when policy is at legislature stage; this is important to attract media and public attention.

  2. What does citizenship mean in the European context?

    On this reading, its significance must be seen at the symbolic level. For some, it could be the symbolism of accountability and democracy. But then, why so empty? There is another possibility. In its rhetoric Maastricht appropriated the deepest symbols of statehood: citizenship, defense, foreign policy -- the rhetoric of a superstate.

  1. Regulation 2560/2001 on cross-border payments in Europe.

    The EU had two reasons to implement Regulation 2560/2001. The first reason for the Regulation was that prices for cross-border transfers were extraordinarily high and made up a significant portion of the transaction value, rendering it a serious cost factor.

  2. "To what extent will the proposed EU constitution affect, the procedure for EU/EC negotiation ...

    Craig, P & De Burca, G., European Community Law, 3rd edition, 2003,OUP p.36-7. Moreover, these provisions were deemed also to apply to issues falling under the third pillar of the EU.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work