• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine the strengths and weaknesses of the British Electoral System as used inThe General Election

Extracts from this document...


Examine the strengths and weaknesses of the British Electoral System as used in The General Election For many, many years, the first past the post electoral system has been used in Britain. Since it has been used for so long, it should surely mean that it is a success? This is not necessarily true, as over the past few years criticism of the system has been growing and a search for an alternative been started. The main concern about the system is that it is not fair. It is possible for a party, who gain few votes, to get a huge majority of seats. For example, in the 2001 elections, in Colchester the liberal democrats won 2 more seats than the conservatives, despite the fact that the conservatives got 39.5% of the vote and the Liberal democrats got just 34.5% Also in Croydon, for the third election in a row, the wrong party has won. In this area Labour won 5 more seats than the conservatives, yet the conservatives got 7% more of the vote. For this reason, it has been said that first past the post is not at all fair, and does not reflect the true feelings or opinions of the voters. Another fact that shows that the feelings and opinions of the voters are not taken into account, is that thousands of votes throughout the country are put to waste as if their candidate does not win his constituency then their votes will be disregarded. ...read more.


Or it can create problems. This majority gained means that the government can do anything they want to. They have complete control in parliament and so it is really irrelevant if the other parties vote on matters, as their opinions will not count. The government could bring in new laws, or change existing laws with no opposition whatsoever. A response to this could be that the system works. It has been tried and tested over many years and everyone in the country can understand it. The process of ticking a box next to the candidate name of the person you want to win and then the person with the most votes wins, is not a hard process to understand. Why change the system and confuse all voters? Another aspect that must be regarded is that there have often been low turnouts at general elections in Britain. One main reason for this is that in a voter's constituency there is always one party with a large majority, so much that it would take a miracle for any other party to win. Therefore this doesn't give the opposition voters any eagerness to vote, as they know that their vote will not be able to sway the result. This also leads to tactical voting, a method that can only be used because the first past the post system is non-proportional. ...read more.


Whereas the conservatives got 30.7% of votes and won 165 seats, Labour also got 43.2% of votes cast and they won 419 seats. If this was done proportionally based upon the number of seats Labour won, the Liberal Democrats should have got around 106 seats in the house of commons. Plus, in the 2001 election the Liberal Democrats got 52 seats from 19% of the vote, whereas if the electoral system in Britain today were proportional then this would have given them approximately 120 seats in parliament. The first past the post system can therefore be said to be limiting the power in Britain to just two parties. Which isn't fair in true democracy. So as can be seen in the essay above there are many different advantages and disadvantages to the British electoral system / First past the post. So the arguments for and against should be weighed up. Although there are various reasons as to why the system works I feel that alternative systems should definitely be considered as there are simply to many unfair results using the present system, there are to many wasted votes; there needs to be more order to the system, where tactical voting will be eliminated and the true opinion of the British voters shown through the result of the general election. The fact that first past the post has been around for so long is not a reason to keep it and overall I think that it is not a success in the world today. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. What is the main reason for the loss of faith and interest in our ...

    This is just a theory, and would probably cost millions if not billions to actually put into practice, and may not even work, which would make it very risky to even try, especially with the criticism's of the education system which are already so evident, and trying to fit yet

  2. The Labour Party.

    Now a Liberal Democrat Lord sitting in the House of Lords. The main ideologies of the party and the most important factions: The ideology in the Liberal Democrat party is anti-authoritarian. The two main ideologies involved with the 'Liberal' 'Democrat' party are Liberalism and Social Democracy i.e.

  1. Electoral Systems.

    * It breaks the link between an individual MP and his or her constituency. * Constituencies would be 3-5 times larger than they are now but with 3-5 MPs. * MPs may have to spend an excessive amount of time dealing with constituency problems and neglect the broader issues.

  2. Should the UK reform the Electoral System used for General Elections

    The country is divided into constituencies and the simple majority elects a candidate to each constituency. Remaining seats are allocated from Regional party lists depending on the proportion of vote for each party. The Alternative Vote Plus system is very similar to the previously mentioned system, with the only real

  1. The 2001 Election - Labour won the 2001 election for a second consecutive time ...

    After winning for a second time Labour are in a strong position and the 2001 win will provide a likely springboard for a third success, although Labour wasn't able to secure the sound majority it wanted from an unusually small electorate (42% of votes only 413 seats).

  2. The Vampires Attack As he walked up the rickety ...

    "Yes, of course, please keep me informed of any more news that comes in," the Prime Minister stuttered incredulously, his face turning white at the thought of vampires on the loose. He knew that whatever it was that had to be done had to be done quickly, or else the whole population was in danger.

  1. Should Britain reform its electoral system for general elections?

    FPTP is disproportional because it is ?seats not votes? that count, it fails to establish a reliable link between the proportion of votes won by parties and the proportion of seats they gain. This happens because the system is primarily concerned with the election of individual members, not with the representation of political parties.

  2. Democracy and the British Voting System.

    This is a huge problem because MPs behaving in such a way is totally undemocratic and could ultimately even lead to an autocracy or dictatorship. 6/10 ? Some good points, but make sure you are clear on your point and use examples to support it 1.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work