• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How relevant has the concept of the 'rule of reason,' developed in United States anti- trust law, been to the particular circumstances of EC competition law?

Extracts from this document...


Competition Law Q. How relevant has the concept of the 'rule of reason,' developed in United States anti- trust law, been to the particular circumstances of EC competition law? Is Regulation 1/2003 and the devolution of power away from the Commission likely to make any difference to this position? The nature of Article 81 (1)1 requires that the agreement, decision, or concerted practice has the object or effect of preventing, restricting or distorting competition in the common market. Article 81 (1) captures all agreements or concerted practices whose object is to restrict trade. However, a problem facing the future of competition law in the Community is the fact that some agreements, although restricting trade, may have characteristics that would enhance trade. The Commission and the European Court of Justice (ECJ) have blocked these types of agreements in the past, which is all set for change with the implementation of Regulation 1/2003. However, the United States Courts have adopted the 'rule of reason', a concept which allows the court to evaluate the effects of the agreement before making a decision as to whether or not this restricts trade. Although there is undoubtedly some restriction of competition, this approach, it can be argued, does allow for a greater degree of flexibility when looking at the issue of competition. ...read more.


No such provision exists in U.S law and therefore the court was forced to employ the rule of reason in order to enforce the legislation. Article 81 (3) does have limitations and these limitations are perhaps the reason for the debate surrounding the adoption of the rule of reason in EC law. Article 81 (3) can only be applied by the Commission, not by national courts so the system of application of Article 81 is seemingly at the whim of the commission. Academics such as Korah believe that the Commission is unwilling to move away from the stance taken by the ECJ, and because it grants few exemptions, the idea that national courts follow this approach would mean that their would be little incentive to attempt new ventures, ' If national courts adopt the Commissions practice, it is feared that many desirable contracts which restrict only competition that could not take place without such an agreement, or which restrict competition more than they increase, may not be made.' Only two types of exemption are made under Article 81 (3), individual and block exemptions. However, it must be noted that the precise factors that will lead the Commission to exempt an agreement will differ from case to case. ...read more.


the courts to have no place in EC law, we can clearly see that its principles are needed in order for Community competition to advance and evolve. The restrictions that dominated procedures for all Article 81 cases are slowly being stripped away. The implementation of Regualtion 1/2003 and the devolution of power away from the Commission means we have a more representative system of legislation. The ECJ, although not a legislative body, has the power to influence any future Commission decision through the verdicts it delivers. By now implementing a system in which the ECJ is encouraged to evaluate the legislation on a much broader level, this could introduce a system where the system of Competition develops as a response to the requirement of the Community at the time, a decision based on the spirit and needs of the Community. Word Count: 2169 1Article 81 EC Treaty 2 Sherman Act 1890 3 Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. US, 221 US 1 (1911) 4 Constan and Grundig v. Commission (Cases 56 & 58/64) 5Societe La Technique Miniere v. Maschinenbau Ulm,(LTM) 1966 ECR 235 6 Case T-65/98 R Van den Bergh Foods v Commission [1998] ECR II-2641 7 EC Treaty 8 Re Bayer and Gist-Brocades [1976] 1 CMLR D98 9 LC Nungesser KG & Kurt Eisle v Commission of the European Communities : ECJ Case C-258/78 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. A clear explanation of key underpinning economic theories relevant to the EU.

    with Germany as no trading restrictions but UK will have to pay for exchanging currency as UK has not adopted the Euro yet. International trade, competition tends to push prices down, increase quality lower price maintain profit level lower unit costs.


    This attitude as well as the worsening agricultural conditions influenced the terms of the New Law particularly the abolition of outdoor relief for the able- bodied poor. Undoubtedly the Whig government was a major influence on the terms of the new Poor Law.

  1. The European Community and ECJ

    This case dealt with a levy imposed on exported goods so as to fund the compilation of statistical data on trade patterns. Although this levy was part of the commercial transaction and did not have equivalent effect to a customs duty, the Court went on to find such charge in breach of Art.

  2. The Importance of the Cyprus Issue in terms of the Accomplishment of the ESDP

    Also, accession without settlement would lead to inequality. Although one part of the island would experience a beneficial economic effect, the economic disparity of the two parts would increase. Therefore, after the end of Cold War, what we come accross in the relevant EU documents is that, the settlement of

  1. "What is the importance of the concept of citizenship in the development of EC ...

    It includes the following titles: * Free movement of goods and workers * The free movement of capital and payments * Freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services * Competition policy, * Economic and monetary policy, * Agricultural policy, * Transport policy, environmental policy, * Research and technology

  2. How Member States can derogate from the trading conditions governed by European Community (EC) ...

    States may impose prohibitions on importing and marketing such products from other Member States in which those products have been lawfully marketed, in the interest of public health. In the Fumicot18 case the court interpreted Article 30 + 36 as allowing the Dutch government to subject French disinfectant to further

  1. Public Law Coursework

    The argument of implied repeal is found to be irrelevant for several crucial reasons which are highlighted in the judgement. Firstly, the Common Law has created a class of legislation which cannot be impliedly repealed and can only be repealed by direct and express language of statute.

  2. "How was the doctrine of supremacy developed by the European Court of Justice, and ...

    - The organs and constituent bodies of the member states, including the legislative, executive and judiciary, are fully responsible for reversing the effects of violations of EU law, which affect individuals. This may, for example, involve the courts ordering the government to pay damages for loss caused by breach of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work