• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In the 1920´s, the League of Nations was not as successful as it should have been.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

In the 1920�s, the League of Nations was not as successful as it should have been. The main members were France and Britain, but they were with too much pressure to take decisions. One example is what happened in Vilna, were the Polish took this area which belonged to Lithuania, and they kept it. Both Lithuania and Poland were members of the League. France and Britain told the Polish to withdraw, but they did not. The French were not prepared to upset Poland because they saw it as a possible ally against Germany in the future. Britain was not prepared to act alone and send troops right to the other side of Europe. If we take into account this only fact, we can consider that the League was a total failure. But, on the other hand, when Germany and Poland wanted control over Upper Silesia, the League decided that it should be divided, and both parts accepted the decision. Something similar happened with Aaland Islands, where both Sweden and Finland wanted control of it. ...read more.

Middle

These are the reasons for which I think that the League of Nations was a complete failure. As I have said before, the main reason or fact that took the League to failure was that the USA did not join it. And, besides this, the League was very disorganized. The two main members had other priorities. British politicians, for example, were more interested in rebuilding British trade and looking after the British Empire than being an international police force. France's main concern was still Germany. It was worried that without an army of its own, the League was too weak to protect France from its powerful neighbour. I think that the idea of Woodrow Wilson of creating an international body to consolidate peace was a great idea, but what made it fail was the lack of organization and importance, principally from France and Britain. The economic crisis of 1929 made the whole system of the League of Nations collapse. ...read more.

Conclusion

and Germany, temporarily); the League had no forces of its own and member countries didn't want to use theirs; it couldn't stop a strong country from conquering a weak one because there wasn't any punishment so countries just ignored the League. Some examples of European and world conflicts in the 1930�s are: Italy conquered Abyssinia, Japan conquered Manchuria, The Germans put military forces in the Rhineline and Czechoslovakia was shared among some countries and dissolved. Some other reasons were the lack of troops, the decisions were slow, the Treaties it had to uphold were seen as unfair, the economic sanctions did not work, the self-interest of leading members, that America and other important countries were absent, it was too liked to the Treaty of Versailles, the economic crisis of 1929, the failure of the world disarmament conference. But the real explanation for the failure of the League of Nations is simple: when aggressive countries such as Japan, Italy and Germany defied the League, specially Britain and France were not ready to support by economic measures. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. How successful was the League of Nations in the 1920's?

    The members were reluctant to make a commitment to the League, which meant the whole idea of world order backfire. Many quarrels over land were brought to the League, and many times the countries involved were not satisfied with the outcomes.

  2. United Nations: "In Bed With The Devil".

    allows for their continued oppression and suppression of the will of the people of Kosova? The UN has good intentions, however in its dealings with Serbia they are "In Bed With The Devil." Even after years of war by Serbia against people in the region, the UN failed to act

  1. The EU's CFSP and the Iraq Crisis: A Catalyst for Change?

    The most striking example of this is the United Nations Security Council. For historical reasons, both Britain and France are permanent members of the council and empowered with veto rights. Thus the EU has either no votes or two votes in the Security Council, depending on how you look at it.

  2. The organisation of the League of Nations was seen as a reason for its ...

    The five permanent members are China, France, the United States of America, the United Kingdom and the Russian Federation. The Security Council has primary responsibility, under the charter, for the maintenance of international peace and security.

  1. The Management of Global Crisis.

    indiscriminate target of non combat victims and property...In order to fulfil effectively its communicative function, terrorism must aim to maximize publicity and the perpetrators must claim responsibility for their actions"(Chalk1996:22). From this extended definition, some aspects need further details. For instance a terrorist group implies political activity -meaning that all

  2. Where Are The Americans?

    use any and all means to become as effective in Politics and Diplomacy as we have been in war.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work