• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Liberalism Notes

Extracts from this document...


LIBERALISM INTRODUCTION * Mainstream western philosophy. Other philosophies define themselves in relation to liberalism. * Evolution over time, though constant stress on individual freedom. Intellectual antecedents are 16th century religious reformations, 17th century scientific revolution and 18th century Enlightenment. !8th/19th century industrialisation created new class interests with commitment to reform programme - so term 'liberalism' dates from early 19th century. * Liberalism a reaction to 19th century absolutist regimes - hence inextricably bound up with national self-determination. Movements for national freedom/unity associated with demands for civil/political rights and for constitutional checks on government. Contrast with Britain, where parliamentary sovereignty established in 17th century - hence liberal domestic programme focused on other objectives such as parliamentary reform, religious toleration and free trade. * 19th century continental liberalism primarily a political creed - and even in Britain the centrality of free markets to liberalism has been exaggerated. Victorian liberalism stood for political reform at home and support for constitutional/national movements abroad. Inspired more by religion (radical nonconformism) than by economics. Indeed from 19th century British liberalism repudiated laisser-faire and accepted need for state intervention ('New Liberalism') - especially in social welfare. * Decline of Liberal Party in 20th century, but ascendancy of liberal ideas. Dominant orthodoxy until late 1970s was derived from New Liberalism - Keynes and Beveridge marked culmination of New Liberal thinking. Challenge to consensus came principally from an older free market version of liberalism - i.e. neo-liberalism. Battle of ideas post 1945 less between left and right than between old and new liberalism. * Today 'liberal' has different meanings in different places - UK Liberals/Liberal Democrats long seen as centre/left of centre; in EU liberalism normally associated with the right; in USA a term of abuse for radical-progressive (crypto-socialist) ideas; label also associated with free market advocates (Hayek, Friedman, New Right). And almost all mainstream ideologies can be regarded as variants of liberalism. ...read more.


VICTORIAN LIBERALISM * Although the term 'liberal' was applied from the early 19th century, the Liberal Party emerged only in the 1850s from a party realignment of Whigs, radicals and Peelite Conservatives. Gladstone (1809-98), originally a Con. follower of Peel, the embodiment of Victorian liberalism. Domination of Liberal party, and shaped in his own image; he became more radical and populist with age. Also inspired by Christian moral fervour - struck chord among nonconformists. So Gladstonian liberalism a moral crusade (Vincent, 1966). * Several strands. Parliamentary reform - derived from Whig tradition; advocacy of Bright, then Gladstone turned it into a populist cause. Proposals for modest franchise extension developed into radical demands for full manhood suffrage. Nonconformist strand - while the 1860s parliamentary party was still overwhelmingly Anglican, the Liberals were becoming 'the party of the nonconformist conscience' (Vincent, 1966).Nonconformist pressures spawned the National Education League (to campaign for a national, free and secular system of education), which provided the model for the National Liberal Federation (1877) which established a national organisation for he Liberal party, and tipped it decisively towards radical nonconformism. By the 1880s the PLP (and the party in the country) was predominantly nonconformist. * Support for liberal and nationalist movements in Europe, especially Italian unification, helped create Palmerston's 1859 government and kept it intact; Gladstone campaigned against the Bulgarian atrocities, bringing him out of premature retirement and into close collaboration with the nonconformists. The religious fervour behind his mission to pacify Ireland both split the party and strengthened the moral element in liberalism. * 'Manchester liberalism' also quite influential in the party after 1859. Free trade was established as a liberal principle. Gladstone, as Chancellor, built on earlier work of Cobden and Bright (Anti Corn Law League, 1846 - repeal of Corn Laws reflected transfer of power from landed to manufacturing interests) by abolishing a range of duties; Cobden negotiated Anglo-French trade treaty of 1860. ...read more.


But ultimately it was the Liberals that swallowed the SDP, and not the other way round - so the modern LDs are the clear lineal descendants of the old Liberal party. * Paradoxically, as fortunes of the Liberals/LDs have risen, LD ideas have become less distinctive. For most of post WW2 period Liberals adopted an intermediate position between Con and Lab. Briefly, in early 1980s, Liberals (and allies) seemed to offer a distinctive middle way between Thatcherism and left wing socialism. Since then Lab has reoccupied the centre ground previously vacated, leaving the LDs with little ideological space and few distinctive ideas or policies - on the management of the economy, constitutional reform, Europe, defence and foreign policy the differences between the LDs and Lab are ARGUABLY more of degree than kind. * Under Ashdown's leadership, coalition with Labour seemed logical, even likely, given Blair's keenness to heal the divisions on the centre-left which had left the Cons dominant for most of the 20th century. Coalitions in LG and in the devolved bodies provide continuing impetus - but sheer scale of Lab's victories in 1997 and 2001 (and resistance within both parties) have weakened the project. LDs have pursued a more independent and critical line under Kennedy, without yet returning to earlier policy of equidistance between Lab and Con. * Attempts made to articulate a distinctive LD philosophy in these unpromising political circumstances - by Wallace (1997), Russell (1999) and Ballard (2000). Yet terminology employed - cooperation, working with others, partnership politics, community - shared by New Labour and progressive Conservatives. Higher profile of LDs has drawn attention to considerable diversity of views in the party - 'free market liberals, social liberals, conservatives with a social conscience and dissatisfied ex-Labour voters, greens, anarchists ....' (Ballard, 2000). Shows tolerance and inclusiveness? But not ideological coherence. The real problem is that there is now little distinctive ideological ground for the LDs to occupy, but this underlines the widespread acceptance of liberal ideas across mainstream British political parties. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Analyse the similarities and differences between Classical and Modern Liberalism

    4 star(s)

    S. Mill implied the nature of humankind as a diverse species should be viewed as a strength. The idea of Freedom and protection of individual rights is also common of both strands. These beliefs stem from the Enlightenment theory that individuals are distinct and valuable, with John Locke defines our (God-given)

  2. Explain Bentham's version of Utilitarianism.

    However this can be seen as a bad thing as well. Since this is a democratic theory in which the interests of the majority are more important than one individual, it does not help with individual quests. There are many difficulties when it comes to the utilitarian theory.

  1. Compare the views about the nature and development of Carl Rogers and George Kelly. ...

    negative regard which the person then interjects, then his style of therapy would be ideal and the real self will have a chance to emerge. This can become an issue as Rogers' conception of self is rather broad. He does describe a variation of self: the "ideal self" which denotes

  2. Is the 'New Right' a departure from or a continuation of traditional British Conservatism?

    so forth."6 The New Right held to virtually all of these in its rhetoric. This is advantageous because each of these concepts, as all Conservatives know well, unites each of them as well as being able to transcend class in their appeal.

  1. How far was the Decline of the Liberal Party in the Period 1867 to ...

    which on more than one occasion was pivotal to Liberal majorities in the Commons. However, any Liberal successes were muted as the party presented an image of chaos and one that was not capable of governing the country. Therefore a policy of 'New Liberalism' was adopted - an attempt to

  2. Similarities and differences between 21st century religious fundamentalism and 20th century European Fascism

    However, the more important contributing factor should be the increasing role that religion is playing in world politics. Judaism has produced its own militant "nationalist" terrorists; Buddhists show a militant and violent side in their politics in Sri Lanka against Hindu Tamils.7 A few American evangelists have engaged in murder

  1. An analysis of the Marxist perspective on religion

    With the unity of society, there is need for religion, however when we look at history we see that this is not the case. In the time of communist Russia there was in fact an increase in Orthodoxy. Furthermore, in many communist states, for example China, the leader is venerated to almost the status of a deity.

  2. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    When people work on the land, they cause everyone to gain since they can give people product from the land by trading it for other things. In conclusion, the government has to protect people's property since people have a natural right to own it and that is the reason why they joined the society.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work