• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Enlargement of the European Union

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Enlargement of the European Union Modern times are challenging the European Union with one of its greatest tasks to date. The issue of enlargement has become the key EU project for completion in 2002. The enlargement of the European Union to the countries of Central and Eastern Europe (CEEC's) raises many issues of concern. In order to understand the problems facing both of the parties involved, it is necessary to first consider the background of EU integration and its recent trends. Enlargement is the means by which national states concede to the transfer of sovereignty to supranational institutions and agree to invest in common policies within a customs union. In the current European case, this fundamentally is the development of the fifteen member state grouping to integrate up to as many as thirteen new member states into the union, ten central and Eastern European countries along with Cyprus, Malta and Turkey. This will enable the EU to span more than two-thirds of the continent in its entirety. At present, it is likely that around ten of these applicant countries will be successful in their bid to join. The next round of the EU enlargement, which is forecast between 2004 and 2006 approximately, is likely to contain six of the applicants. It will certainly have serious implications for the economic, political, social and military nature of the Union. Of course the Union has undertaken enlargements previously, however none have been as large a step for Europe as the one scheduled. It is an innovative change in many ways, considering that the previous enlargements did not involve states as geographically, politically and economically diverse from the current members. Also each of the enlargements to date encompassed three or four countries at the most (Norway took part in the most recent enlargement, but rejected membership in a national referendum), so this enlargement is quantitatively groundbreaking also. ...read more.

Middle

The consequences of which were politically driven, it had devastating economic effects for industry and agriculture in the former German Democratic Republic. It created a high level of unemployment and, despite massive financial transfers from West to East Germany, little has changed with regard to the structural problems of the East. In fact, the net transfer from West to East Germany between 1990 and 1997 to the tune of approximately 500 million Euro, now represents a huge burden also for the West German financial, fiscal and social system. The CEEC's are also anxious about whether there exists a huge gap between the stated political will for enlargement and its realistic implementation. None of the candidate countries for membership meet the economic conditions for quick accession. The differences between the political, economic and legal systems, developed over forty years of separation, are not so easily overcome and there is those who hold the opinion that it is irresponsible for Western European politicians to keep encouraging unrealistic expectations.17 In the report by the commission of November 2000 on the candidate countries, it discusses the political criteria of the Copenhagen summit. These refer mainly to the need for democracy, human rights and the protection of minorities. All the applicants have now met these requirements (except Turkey, with whom substantive dialogue has yet to take place), even if some still have a little progress to make in the area of protection of minorities. The need for reform of the judicial systems is pointed out, effective enforcement of the acquis is impossible without this.18 Since the EU is in the first place an economic union or, more precisely, a subsidies community, when one considers that 80% of its budget goes to the different subsidy funds, we can anticipate that accession negotiations will take longer than generally anticipated. Also the conditions for accession and the results of the negotiations are likely to produce smaller development resources than expected and enlargement may well lead to a dispute over budget allocations within ...read more.

Conclusion

There are those who would suggest that, in this latest enlargement, the Union is taking on more than it can handle and that the undertaking faces too many obstacles and difficulties to succeed. However, this development is an historical imperative and a natural progression of the idealistic project, which dates back almost fifty years now to when the first six member states came together to forge an ever closer union among the peoples of Europe. This ideal still holds true today, and it is both the duty and desire of the EU to ensure a prosperous future for all concerned. 1 Cram, Dinan, Nugent, 'Government and Politics of the European Union', 4th edition,1999, page 270. 2 www.europeanmovement.ie/enlargement 3 D. Dinan, 'Ever Closer Union', 2nd edition 1998, page 191 4 Ibid 5 OpCit Cram, Dinan, Nugent, 'Government and Politics of the European Union' , page 271 6 J. Redmond & G. Rosenthal, 'The expanding of the EU: past, present and future', 1998,page 165 7 OpCit Cram, Dinan, Nugent, 'Government and Politics of the European Union', page 271 8 A. O'Rourke, 'Enlargement: challenges and opportunities', IIEA 2001, page 15 9 Ibid, page 7 10 Ibid 11 Ibid, page 8 12 Ibid 13 Ibid 14 Ibid 15 OpCit J. Redmond & G. Rosenthal, 'The expanding of the EU: past, present and future' page 166 16 European Movement, 'Trans-national dialogue on EU enlargement and institutional reform' - Reports and recommendations, pg 10 17 www.iuf.org/iuf/cee 18 OpCit O'Rourke 'Challenges and opportunities', page 11 19 OpCit www.iuf.org 20 OpCit Cram, Dinan, Nugent, 'Government and Politics of the European Union', page 281 21 OpCit O'Rourke 'Challenges and opportunities', page 75 22 OpCit Cram, Dinan, Nugent, 'Government and Politics of the European Union', page 271 23 OpCit J. Redmond & G. Rosenthal, 'The expanding of the EU: past, present and future' page 105 24 OpCit Cram, Dinan, Nugent, 'Government and Politics of the European Union' page 283 25 OpCit J. Redmond & G. Rosenthal, 'The expanding of the EU: past, present and future', page 173 ?? ?? ?? ?? 10 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "'A troublesome partner.' Using examples, to what extent would you say this comment accurately ...

    4 star(s)

    Euro.6 Recent speeches in Germany have called for a full UK role 'we missed the opportunities to integrate, which were not in our nation's interest.' Also, William Hague's well-known mantra of 'In Europe, not run by Europe' has been altered by Tony Blair.

  2. Which EU institution is the most powerful

    However the Court's power is limited. Above all, it must rely on member states to carry out its ruling through enforcement agencies. The perception that it has tended to pursue integrationist goals has led member states to grant it only a very limited role in the justice and foreign policy pillars.

  1. The aim of this essay is to present the reason of British government changing ...

    had been occasioned by the 1965 crisis, nothing had occurred that would persuade the French president to change his mind.13 Negotiations with Great Britain, interrupted in December 1967 following the second French veto, resumed officially on 30 June 1970 in Luxembourg in the wake of the Hague Summit, which, in

  2. Explain the process by which EU law is made and the process by which ...

    Article 249 states that the EU has the power to issue various types of orders. These are: * Regulations, which are automatically 'binding in every respect and directly applicable in each Member State'. This means that such laws automatically become law in all member states and ensures that the law is uniform in all member states.

  1. Why was the accession of the UK to the EEC in 1972 so politically ...

    James Callaghan renegotiated Britain's membership to the EEC although not all were convinced of its merits. In June 1975 Britain held a referendum on EU maintaining EU membership and Prime Minister Harold Wilson waived collective responsibility within his Labour Party due to the controversial nature of the vote.

  2. "Critically Discuss the Prospective Economic and Political Impact of Turkish Accession to the European ...

    to join the EU, notably a stable democracy, the presence of a state of law, and respect for minority and human rights. Turkey is working to meet these criteria but is still far from the expected. This is where most prejudices against Turkish accession come from.

  1. The Cult Phenomenon

    As a result, changes occur to a person after joining a cult. Many people today have turned to a perceived spiritual leader or group seeking sanctuary, believing that they have at last found someone they can trust, something meaningful to believe in, someone who truly loves them unconditionally.

  2. Transformation of the U.S. Hegemony in Europe through NATO after the Cold War

    Two years later, in Berlin and Brussels (1996 Defense Ministerial Meetings), this position was confirmed, despite France's objections.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work