• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do pressure groups promote pluralist democracy?

Extracts from this document...


[To what extent do pressure groups promote pluralist democracy? 25m] By Mati Saidzai 12N Pressure groups are organised groups of people who are united by a common cause or topic. They do not seek for power instead they wish to influence and change the policies and views of government. They also try to get the public involved and they seek to influence and change their opinions and views too. Pressure groups have different classifications. One could be sectional pressure groups which are described as interest groups, who usually represent limited, specific interests. An example of this could be Unite, Britain?s biggest trade unions that represent general workers. ...read more.


All aim to influence policy and decision making. Methods used are to seek insider status. These numerous pressure groups all have the right to do this as they don?t have restriction on formation. Example of this could be CBI. Confederation of British industry welcomed a new business friendly government in 2010. This influenced government to reduce corporation tax on company profits by 94% over 4 years. This shows that pressure groups promote pluralist democracy in the UK. Another way pressure groups promote pluralist democracy can be that government listens. They listen to pressure groups and act upon their concerns which show that pressure groups promote pluralist democracy. ...read more.


This therefore supports the fact that pressure groups do not promote pluralist democracy. Another argument against pressure groups promoting pluralist democracy could be representation. The representation of pressure groups shows that it does not promote pluralist democracy. There are many groups that claim to represent the minorities. For example shelter represents the homeless and aids represent people with HIV or AIDS. However there is no single voice and so the group with the most money and resources are more likely to be listened to and so this is unfair. This suggests that pressure groups do not promote pluralist democracies most pressure groups are denied to influence. Overall In Conclusion, pressure groups do promote pluralist democracy because it makes government more efficient as the Pressure Groups put pressure on the government to make the decision that is best for the public. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Pressure Groups section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Pressure Groups essays

  1. Compare and Contrast Pluralist and Marxist Accounts of Power in the UK and US.

    In Britain and America there are a large number of media outlets on both a local and a national scale, and whilst locally the ownership and allegiance to party politics is diversified; on a more national level there are only a few much larger companies able to provide a profitable service.

  2. The wealthier and the closer the pressure group is to the government, the more ...

    In addition, the debate surrounding, whether the movement of pressure groups is elitist sparks claims that wealth is essentially the key determinant of a pressure groups success.

  1. Are pressure groups good or bad for democracy?

    So do we really live in a democratic society if "crazy" (radical) ideas are simply ignored? Can people really change the country they live in or they are forced to follow government's opinion? The debates around this question can last forever.

  2. Examples, methods and the effects on democracy of pressure groups.

    a lot more lobbying whereas insiders may just be able to make a phone call to a representative of someone high up in the political chain. Pressure groups although not aiming to run the country or take away power from the government, wish to impact them and check government power as well as defending their own freedom.

  1. Pressure Groups in democracy

    Another argument against Pressure groups are that they perform irresponsible acts in a democratic society, however they are forced to use different methods depending on who they are and what kind of status they have. Sometimes this can lead to certain pressure groups obtaining a bad press, a good example

  2. Pressure groups revison notes

    is more achievable 2. The more focused, specific and realistic the aims are the more achievable they are Pluralism and Elitism: Theories of P&E provide us with democratic models to explain how govs and groups interact with each other in the decision making process.

  1. Free essay

    To what extent do Pressure groups undermine democracy?

    Indeed it has also been argued that the existence of so many pressure groups persuades people to believe that they have influence when in fact they have very little. It has been suggested that from the 1940s to the 1970s national political decision making operated within a framework of so-called

  2. To what extent have pressure groups in the UK changed in recent years?

    This has resulted in the development of a increasing number of 'federated' groups in Europe. This essentially means that different pressure groups that have similar or exactly the same views on particular issues have amalgamated into one European-wide institution. A few examples of this type of affiliation that has occurred

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work