• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent is there a democratic deficit in the EU?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent is there a democratic deficit in the EU? The question over the legitimacy of the EU has been a nearly continuous debate and many commentators appear to agree that the EU suffers from a severe 'democratic deficit'. There are many reasons why this perception is so widespread. As a multinational body it lacks the grounding in common history and culture upon which most individual polities can draw. However, this should not necessarily disqualify the EU from being treated as a democratically legitimate body. Andrew Moravcsik believes concern about the EU's 'democratic deficit' to be misplaced. Judged against existing democracies, rather than ideal parliamentary democracy, the EU is legitimate. Most critics overlook the relatively optimistic conclusion because they analyse the EU in ideal and isolated terms, drawing comparisons between the EU and a utopian democracy. This use of idealistic standards is leads many analysts to overlook the extent to which delegation and insulation are widespread trends in modern democracies. When analysts criticise the lack of democratic legitimacy in the EU they generally point to the mode of political representation and the nature of policy outputs. Only one branch of the EU is directly elected is the European Parliament. Though stronger than it once was, the EP remains is actually only one of four major actors in the EU policy-making process. ...read more.


It is now the EP that, late in the legislative process, accepts rejects or amends legislation in a manner more difficult for the Council to reject than to accept. In the Council of Ministers, which imposes the most important constraint on everyday EU legislation, permanent representatives and ministers act under constant instruction from national executives, just as they would at home, although admittedly they are compromising with their counterparts from other countries. Here the bonds of accountability are tight: these representatives can be re-instructed or recalled at will and this is an important channel of democracy, which maintains the intergovernmental structure of the EU. And, interestingly, the European Central Bank is more independent of political pressure than any known national example. The EU's appearance of exceptional insulation is due to the subset of functions it performs which are matters of low electoral salience and there is no need to divulge these matters to a public who would not understand nor be interested in them. There is a symbiotic relationship between national and EU policy-making- a division of labour in which commonly delegated functions tend to be carried out by the EU, while functions that inspire popular participation remain largely national. This gives the impression that the EU is undemocratic, whereas it is simply specialising in those functions of democratic governance that tend to involve less direct political participation. ...read more.


It is true that certain aspects of the system, such as early discussion of COREPER, tend to take place in relative secret, but the same could be said of the preparation of legislation in national systems, for example the increasing amount of private Cabinet meetings under Blair. Given the vehemence of the critique levelled against it, one might assume that the EU lacks any form of democratic participation and accountability at all. Siedentop believes that this is the stuff of British tabloids, fuelled by ignorance of what the EU actually does. However, it does underlie much legitimate concern, particularly those amongst the libertarian right of the political spectrum. There is no elected head of state to give democratically controlled direction to the EU and concerns gain plausibility from the open role played by non-elected officials in Brussels, and the geographical and cultural distance between those regulators and the average European 'person in the street'. The recent enlargement has at least altered the democratic legitimacy in a positive way. Each country has only one commissioner now and it is further on its way towards a constitution and a fairer weighted vote. The EU employs direct accountability via the EP and indirect accountability via elected national officials. When judged by the practices of existing nation-states and in the context of a multi-level system, the EU does not suffer from a fundamental democratic deficit to anymore of an extent that any national government. Pandora Sykes ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    ‘The main democratic deficit in the European Union is psychological, not institutional.’ Discuss.

    4 star(s)

    Both the ideas of citizenship and free movement of workers have been conceived by the commission and European Court of Justice (ECJ). In relation to the opaque policy-making process, the 1996 Intergovernmental Conference gave provisions on increased transparency. For instance, it allows any citizen of the Union access to documents subject to certain limits.

  2. A clear explanation of key underpinning economic theories relevant to the EU.

    The Portuguese don not take ease to animal testing and have strong thoughts to this. The main religion in Portugal is Christianity. Education systems is being improved every year Portugal. Portugal has adopted the single currency the euro after major debates and now the country is benefiting from this.

  1. To What Extent Does the EU Display a 'Democratic Deficit'?

    Furthermore, there are significant problems with elections to the EU that challenge the view that they are truly democratic (in the sense of a liberal democracy). Firstly, the turnout to European Parliament elections is particularly low. This means that the mandate of the Parliament could be called into question, seeing

  2. Analyse the claim that nowadays "the president's cabinet performs no useful functions

    There are many reasons why the cabinet's power is limited and why it may be claimed that today it performs no useful functions. A formal cabinet is not explicitly mentioned in the constitution, which states that the president "may require the opinion in writing of the principal officer in each

  1. Effectiveness and Democratic Legitimacy: An Investigation of the European Democratic Deficit

    (Schmidt, 1997, 129) In spite of being empowered to take majority decisions binding on all member states, the Council is not subject to parliamentary accountability. The Commission, although it has increasingly been made accountable to the European Parliament, also enjoys more independence than member state governments from their respective parliaments.

  2. EU functions

    parliament and council in order for it to be adopted into the E.U law. The council of the European union as mentioned previously holds half of the responsibility within the law-making process. As with the Parliament the Council was also founded on the founding treaties.

  1. Is there a democratic deficit in the EU? What are its implications and how ...

    The Parliament can only dismiss the whole Commission rather than one member, as almost happened in 1999 (when they jumped before they were pushed) when only 4 out of 20 Commissioners were involved in the scandal, which means the commissioner's accountability is weak.

  2. To what extent is the European Union, with the Constitutional treaty, an independent, democratic ...

    The European Union constitution was written, but as it was a need to restructure the constitutional treaties, not only because of the enlargement of the Union, but also because the treaties were to complex and made the whole system functioning not very efficient,so the new draft constitutional treaties were introduced.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work