• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"It is clear that eyewitness testimony is entirely unreliable".To what extent does psychological research support this view on eyewitness testimony?

Extracts from this document...


"It is clear that eyewitness testimony is entirely unreliable". To what extent does psychological research support this view on eyewitness testimony? 18 marks Plan - Studies which back up this view Loftus and Palmer 1974 Loftus et al. 1987 Loftus and Burns 1982 Wagenaar and Groeneweg 1990 False memory syndrome Registration Expectations etc. Registration Witness factors/event factors? With regard to the extent of psychological research which supports the view concerning the unreliability of eyewitness testimony, a number of judgements can be made. Firstly, one can refer to a study carried out by Loftus and Palmer in 1974, where one hundred and fifty participants were asked to watch a video of cars colliding, and then fill in a questionnaire about what they saw. The important question involved the speed of the cars at the point of impact. However, the question was phrased differently for different groups of participants. Some were asked "How fast were the two cars going when they hit each other"; others were asked the same question but with the word "smashed", "collided", "bumped" or "contacted" replacing the word "hit". ...read more.


Their recall for other details was also poorer, and they were less able to identify the man from a set of photographs. From this study, we can come to the conclusion that a salient detail such as a gun can focus attention, and so lead to poorer recall for other details of the event. In other words, participants seem to remember the most important details the most, and will focus all their attention on salient details like the gun (weapon focus), and miss out on other significant details of the situation. A third study one can take into consideration is the Loftus and Burns study, which was carried out in 1982 and portrays evidence that the violence of an event can also affect recall. Participants were shown one of two versions of a simulated armed robbery on video. One version included a scene of a boy being shot in the face while the robbers were making their getaway. The recall of detail of the event was much higher for participants who had seen the "non-violent" version had less accurate and less complete recall, not only for event immediately before the shooting, but also for events up to two minutes earlier. ...read more.


However, this might only be partial. As with the influence of exposure time on memory, this too was demonstrated by Ebbinghaus (1885). It has also been shown in a naturalistic study of long term forgetting, carried out by Wagenaar and Groeneweg in1990. Seventy-eight survivors of the concentration camp, Camp Erika, were interviewed between 1984 and 1987 about their camp experiences. The information they gave was compared with earlier evidence they had given just after the end of the war. There was general agreement in the later interviews on basic information. All but three of the thirty-eight people who had been tortured by the camp commandant, for example, remembered his name. However, much of the detail had been lost. In conclusion, while basic information may be well remembered over time, details tend to be forgotten. On the whole, storage factors can affect recall. Basic information is often retained, but detailed information is lost over time. Memory can be supplemented by later information. It can be distorted by misleading information, known as the misinformation effect. This can also lead to completely inaccurate information being given. The misinformation effect has been challenged in terms of whether it is the result of memory impairment of the effects of bias in the testing situation. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Report on Psychological Research into Eyewitness Testimony

    Ideas that they hadn't previously experienced were either lost or reformed to fit with their preset expectations.4 This experiment is important in explaining the theory of reconstructive memory, and it also shows the unreliability of eyewitness testimony. If an unfamiliar story can be changed unconsciously to such a degree after

  2. The Effects of leading questions on Eyewitness Testimony

    This reduced the likelihood of participants giving answers that they believed to be incorrect or misleading to affect the results of the experiment. Also, these types of experiments tend to have low ecological validity, as high levels of control can lead to artificial situations, which make the results less applicable to every-day life.

  1. "Eyewitness testimony differs from many other aspects of memory in that accuracy is of ...

    "boats" replaced "canoe". The distortions increased with time and most of the errors made the story read more like an English story and to make it more coherent. There was evidence of flattening (failure to recall unfamiliar details e.g. the ghosts)

  2. To what extent does psychological research support the accuracy of eye witness testimony?

    Another theory for this reduction in recall could be List's idea of high and low probability in EWT. List asked a group of people to rate what probability different events had in a shoplifting scenario; she then showed each incident as a video to different participants, and one week later tested their recall.

  1. "Eyewitness testimony differs from many other aspects of memory in that accuracy is of ...

    A key reason for memory distortion is that witnesses pick up information from other sources, a combination of memory from different experiences. Much research shows that memory more closely resembles a synthesis of experiences. Bartlett (1932) carried out research on reconstructive memory.

  2. To what extent has psychological research shown eyewitness testimony to be unreliable?

    From this study it was found that participants who were asked the speed when the cars smashed said higher speeds than the participants questioned with less harsh nouns. Also, more participants in the smashed condition claimed to have seen broken glass.

  1. Describe and Evaluate Research by E.Loftus into Eye Witness Testimony, the implications of the ...

    Coined by the Federal Bureau of Investigation in the 1970s, a team was set up known as the Behavioural sciences unit (later known as the Investigation Support Unit) due to the sharp increase of serial murders and rape in the USA.

  2. Discuss research into one factor which affects eyewitness testimony

    This study shows that misleading information can alter the mental representation a witness has of an event, consequentially reducing their accuracy. However this study could be criticised as it was a lab experiment so it was an artificial task as it used a realistic video footage so the participants knew they had to pay attention.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work