• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent is the alteration in Nora's relationship with Torvald evident in the way she speaks over the course of the play?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent is the alteration in Nora's relationship with Torvald evident in the way she speaks over the course of the play? The drastic change in Nora's relationship with Torvald that occurs during the course of the play is made quite evident by what she says and the way she delivers her speech. At the beginning of the play Nora seems completely happy with her doll-like relationship with Torvald. She responds affectionately to Torvald's teasing and plays along with him - "if you only knew what expenses we skylarks and squirrels have, Torvald". She is quite happy to be Torvald's "little featherbrain". However, as the play continues, Nora starts to realise that her marriage has been a performance and that she needs her own freedom. She becomes more rebellious, starts to use the imperative with Torvald and somewhat abandons her childlike language. As the play reaches its end, Nora becomes totally independent from Torvald and talks to him from equal to equal, not daughter to father. At the beginning of the play, Nora's relationship with Torvald seems that of a child with her father. ...read more.


She says things "clapping her hands" and "nodding and smiling happily" when she is happy and when she doesn't dare say to Torvald that she wants money she says it "in a rush", "not looking at him - playing with his waistcoat buttons" as if saying it faster or distracting him would make it easier for him to accept, which is often done by children. Torvald also says things such as "my little songbird mustn't ever do that again" "wagging a finger at her" as if she were his pet that he had to educate. Although at the beginning of the play Nora seems very happy with her doll-like existence with Torvald, as the play continues and she becomes more frightened by Krogstad's blackmail, her language becomes more urgent, she uses the imperative with Torvald - "sit down and play for me" , "call it back", "listen, Torvald" - and she makes senseless comments because she is so distressed - "a thing like that couldn't happen. It isn't possible-I have three little children!". ...read more.


She says things clearly to him - "you don't understand me. And I've never understood you" - and realising it is "the first time that ...man and wife have had a serious talk together". She confronts him with the truth, that she has "been performing tricks" for him and that "it's no good your forbidding me anything any longer" because she has freed herself. By the end of the play Nora has her own voice, not Torvald's, she is no longer his doll that will do whatever he asks to please him, no longer his "little skylark" and "not the wife for you". Over the course of the play, the alteration in Nora's relationship with Torvald is made evident by the change in the way she speaks. At the beginning, she is his "little squirrel", a childish "featherbrain" that is pampered and patronised by Torvald. The various turning points in the action, where Nora starts to change the way she speaks, using the imperative and contradicting Torvald start to show the change in the relationship that is completed by the end of the play, when Nora talks clearly to Torvald from equal to equal, having a voice of her own, no longer his doll. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Henrik Ibsen section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Henrik Ibsen essays

  1. “Hedda Gabler is deeply preoccupied with the nature of power.” To what extent is ...

    Not because [Thea] asked him to ...but he knew all right that [she] didn't like that sort of thing. And then he gave it up (drinking)". Here, Elvsted's brand of power stems from a good source and Lovborg reforms by the goodness of her heart.

  2. Reviewing a live performance - Henrik Ibsen's : A Doll's House.

    grasp onto the exact approach the director was leaning to, without having to spend my complete focus on the acting. * I believe improvements could be made to certain aspects of the acting during this interpretation, but all in all, I saw this production as successful in stressing is chosen

  1. "Do you want your characters to live? See to it that they are free." ...

    and Firs' abandonment becomes a liberation and he is granted, however briefly, a new life. As an after thought to the narrative of these plays, it might be interesting to explore the nature of freedom and life in characters meta-theatrically.

  2. The play - ‘A Doll’s House’

    he has found out about Nora's secret and has been told that no further action will be taken against him. This is where the largest section of tension and atmosphere created by his character comes into play, because you realise that this man does not have the faintest idea of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work