• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

It cannot be true that there is life after death, because there is no evidence for it. Do you agree? You must refer to one religion in your answer.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'It cannot be true that there is life after death, because there is no evidence for it.' Do you agree? You must refer to one religion in your answer. I do not believe that the statement "it cannot be true that there is life after death because there is no evidence for it" is true. I doubt it on the grounds that it can be stated that there is life after death because there is no evidence that there isn't! In this essay I will justify this belief and will explain what the major religions all say on this matter. Christianity says that there is an afterlife but proposes no evidence for this. ...read more.

Middle

But why are these guarantees of an afterlife? These both could be a feature of the human brain and how its function. It does not mean that there is an after life. There are also sightings of ghosts or dead family members. Yet there is still no scientific evidence for sightings of ghosts. So where does this leave us? Well lack of evidence does not necessarily mean that the after life does not exist. But as a true believer of science I do not see how an afterlife could exist. If an afterlife for humans did exist this would mean other animals with brains would too have to have an afterlife as they would too possess an afterlife. ...read more.

Conclusion

Is it physical or is it spiritual? I myself would hope there is an afterlife. I hate the idea of there being nothingness although there was nothingness for billions of years before my birth! So is this rational fear or innate fear? I believe that this fear is in our brains as in innate. This is because as a species we needed traits to survive. Just like today when domesticated cats will hide their faeces and will still fear direct eye contact. This behaviour in the wild would help the cat survive. In conclusion I agree with the statement "It cannot be true that there is life after death, because there is no evidence for it." On the grounds that there is no scientific evidence for an after life and also because the practical theory of an afterlife is next to impossibility. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Miscellaneous section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Miscellaneous essays

  1. Religion and science - cosmology

    but the scientific idea suggests that we developed over millions of years. Something that interests me is the fact that scientists have found/discovered dinosaur bones and fossils that aren't accounted for in religious cosmologies. This is a reason why scientists say that scientific cosmologies are true because there is proof

  2. Are Science and Religion Compatible over the question of how the universe began?

    In the case of how the universe began, a theory we currently know of is that the universe was created in seven days according to the Order of Creation. The original theory could have implied that the universe was created in, for example, seven time phases, but this again is not as widely considered.

  1. Earth Summits are all talk and no action Do you agree?

    This can be understood in Exodus 23:10-11 "And six years thou shalt sow thy land, and shalt gather in the fruits thereof: But the seventh year thou shalt let it rest and lie still; that the poor of thy people may eat: and what they leave the beasts of the field shall eat.

  2. The only situation which would justify abortion would be to save the mothers life. ...

    Thomson is criticised because she does not completely justify foetus extinction, just extraction upon the woman's rights. Another stance to the argument, and one that several feminists take up is the issue that a woman has a right to her own privacy.

  1. Are Near Death Experiences:

    This victim said this 'dream' was very clear and could remember exactly what happened with out any other understanding of what would have happened if she wasn't looking down on herself. There are many reasons backing up these explanations such as, how the victims gathered the knowledge of medical procedures,

  2. Democracy is a universal good. Do you agree?

    This allows meritocracy to kick in, and people are able to develop their personal skills without discrimination or prejudice. In turn, as these individuals contribute back to the country by working in jobs, they tend up supporting the economy, providing a backbone for the economy.

  1. Explain why some people believe that the paranormal proves there is a life after ...

    Ghosts can either be a physical presence which can be seen or the feeling of the presence of somebody with you. People believe that ghosts come back to haunt the living, to look after and support loved ones, or just to contact the living.

  2. Science and Religion do they have anything to offer each other?

    He wrote a book in 2007 called ?The Dawkins Delusion? to counter Richard Dawkin?s controversial book called ?The God Delusion?, published in 2006. Alistair McGrath criticizes Dawkin?s very harsh, blunt, and hostile ideas about the very concept of religion, and that because Dawkins has no phycology training he is not

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work