• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do organizations like the IMF, WTO, and World Bank challenge the nation states ability to shape domestic economic and social policy?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent do organizations like the IMF, WTO, and World Bank challenge the nation state's ability to shape domestic economic and social policy? At the conclusion of World War II, several international institutions were established to manage the world economy and prevent another Great Depression from happening again. These institutions include the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (now called the World Bank), and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), which was expanded and institutionalized into the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 1995. These institutions have not only persisted for over five decades, but they have also expanded their mandates, changed their missions and increased their membership. Part of the problem for these institutions lies in their legacy. They were designed to help the developed countries create a cooperative and stable world economy in a nonglobalized world. The IMF was established to support the fixed exchange rate system created at the Bretton Woods conference in 1944; its role was to aid countries that were experiencing difficulties in maintaining their fixed exchange rate by providing them with short term loans. The IMF also maintained global monetary cooperation and stability by making loans to countries with balance of payment problems, stabilized exchange rates and stimulated growth and employment. The IMF has since expanded its role to include a strong surveillance function: it must approve a country's economic program in order for a government to access grants and loans from virtually all governmental and private financiers. ...read more.


on products considered as sensitive by Argentina, increase in tariffs on imports of crude oil by South Korea, re-introduction of export subsidies for certain dairy products by the European Commission, and a rise in import duties on cars and trucks by Russia. There has been much speculation in joining international institutions and publicly agreeing to abide by its rules, norms and practices because it has important domestic political consequences. It can help domestic leaders to alter policies at home that they otherwise would not be able to do. It can help them lock in "good" policies (i.e., ones that enhance general welfare) and resist pressures by special interests to adopt "bad" policies (i.e., ones that benefit special interests only). For others the key is that achieving cooperative agreements with other countries brings advantages for some domestic groups that otherwise would not be involved in a change of policy; once their interests are engaged through the multilateral process they can become strong proponents for policy change at home. The domestic political consequences of IMF and World Bank membership may be important but little research addresses this directly. Many websites note that countries underwent IMF programs out of choice as much as necessity. Governments were using the IMF to produce changes in policies that they desired. But unfortunately, these changes did not produce economic growth or poverty reduction. ...read more.


The critic's theoretical understanding of the WTO as a vehicle only moved by corporate profit-seeking logic is borne out from the WTO's history to date. In every case that has been brought to the organization challenging environmental or public safety legislation on behalf of corporations, the corporations have won. When foreign commercial shrimp fishing interests challenged the protection of giant sea turtles in our endangered species act, the turtles didn't stand a chance. Critics of the IMF say that since the 1980's, the organization has been bailing out countries during financial crises with emergency loan packages that have specific conditions. With this assistance, countries have to follow the IMF's policies to get loans, international assistance, and even debt relief. The predictable consequences have always been disastrous. Tight monetary policy and skyrocketing interest rates not only stop productive investment, stampeding savings into short-run financial investment instead of long-term productive investment, it keeps many businesses from getting the kind of month-to-month loans needed to continue even ordinary operations. This fosters unemployment and drops in production and therefore income. Fiscal austerity-raising taxes and reducing government spending-further depresses aggregate demand, also leading to reductions in output and increases in unemployment. Likewise, if any of the government spending eliminated was actually improving people's lives, then reductions in those programs eliminates those benefits. Privatization of public utilities, transport, and banks is always accompanied by layoffs. Whether productivity and efficiency is improved in the long run depends on how badly the public enterprises were run in the first place, and if private operation proves to be an improvement. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree International Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree International Politics essays

  1. The impostion of Structural Adjustment Programmes on sovereign African states is a form of ...

    The introduction of these comprehensive and intrusive policies have led to widespread civil disobedience among urban populations and friction among the governing elites. Many African leaders, such as President Kuanda of Zambia, have repudiated the structural adjustment programmes and sought to pursue a policy of national sel-sufficiency.

  2. Why Is the Middle East a Conflict Area?

    Sharon responded with a rare speech to the nation--in which he disappointed all expectations that he would announce a new policy direction. Among voters, confidence that he has a strategy is bleeding away. In one Israeli public-opinion poll, 29 percent of respondents said that Sharon had a clear plan, while 58 percent said he was simply reacting to events.

  1. Is free trade beneficial or detrimental for developing states?

    is more suited to banana growing, thus the Indonesian business would probably have to shut down whereas under protectionism they could have maintained a high level of demand within the domestic market. That said, as far as the global economy is concerned, increased competition is certainly a positive outcome of

  2. Analysis of the mechanisms used by international economic elites to convince people of the ...

    class and within.1 Some of the participants of these private meetings are world important people: the former secretary on NATO, Presidents of National security affairs, Mayor of Brussels , but also academic people: Professors of Economic, Communication Science , International Relations , as well as the heads of the biggest

  1. Do Developing countries have much of a voice in WTO Decision-Making?

    By instituting a system of guidelines, regulations and norms of inter-state conduct, it sets to minimise bilateral exploitation and even trim down the number of multiple bilateral deals; consequentially increasing multilateral deals and lowering transaction cost. It is the only organisation that globally deals with international trade; it heads to

  2. Nato's Istanbul Cooperation Initiative. NATOs Istanbul Initiative inscribes itself in the ...

    Balts, the Poles, the Hungarians and the northern part of Yugoslavia - are a single continent. It is semi-attached to Latin America by a thin neck of land, just as it is on the ordinary map. This Euro-America is separated from its nearest neighbor Euro-Asia - the place running from

  1. Integrated but not Assimilated - Many have argued that the Kurds should have their ...

    This group was supported by outside funds and was heavily tied to Al-Qaida. It represented a serious threat to Kurdish control of the region, and violent clashes erupted between these extremists and PUK Peshmerga. Prior to the US Invasion in 2003, CIA operatives, followed by the Operators of the 10th Special Forces Group (10th SOG)

  2. Can the United States retain its status as top nation?

    Since 1962, the United States debt ceiling had raise for many times, while the financial situation is getting worse. On July 31st, 2011, the Democratic party and the Republican party of the United State reached the agreement on raising the debt ceiling.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work