• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do organizations like the IMF, WTO, and World Bank challenge the nation states ability to shape domestic economic and social policy?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent do organizations like the IMF, WTO, and World Bank challenge the nation state's ability to shape domestic economic and social policy? At the conclusion of World War II, several international institutions were established to manage the world economy and prevent another Great Depression from happening again. These institutions include the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (now called the World Bank), and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), which was expanded and institutionalized into the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 1995. These institutions have not only persisted for over five decades, but they have also expanded their mandates, changed their missions and increased their membership. Part of the problem for these institutions lies in their legacy. They were designed to help the developed countries create a cooperative and stable world economy in a nonglobalized world. The IMF was established to support the fixed exchange rate system created at the Bretton Woods conference in 1944; its role was to aid countries that were experiencing difficulties in maintaining their fixed exchange rate by providing them with short term loans. The IMF also maintained global monetary cooperation and stability by making loans to countries with balance of payment problems, stabilized exchange rates and stimulated growth and employment. The IMF has since expanded its role to include a strong surveillance function: it must approve a country's economic program in order for a government to access grants and loans from virtually all governmental and private financiers. ...read more.


on products considered as sensitive by Argentina, increase in tariffs on imports of crude oil by South Korea, re-introduction of export subsidies for certain dairy products by the European Commission, and a rise in import duties on cars and trucks by Russia. There has been much speculation in joining international institutions and publicly agreeing to abide by its rules, norms and practices because it has important domestic political consequences. It can help domestic leaders to alter policies at home that they otherwise would not be able to do. It can help them lock in "good" policies (i.e., ones that enhance general welfare) and resist pressures by special interests to adopt "bad" policies (i.e., ones that benefit special interests only). For others the key is that achieving cooperative agreements with other countries brings advantages for some domestic groups that otherwise would not be involved in a change of policy; once their interests are engaged through the multilateral process they can become strong proponents for policy change at home. The domestic political consequences of IMF and World Bank membership may be important but little research addresses this directly. Many websites note that countries underwent IMF programs out of choice as much as necessity. Governments were using the IMF to produce changes in policies that they desired. But unfortunately, these changes did not produce economic growth or poverty reduction. ...read more.


The critic's theoretical understanding of the WTO as a vehicle only moved by corporate profit-seeking logic is borne out from the WTO's history to date. In every case that has been brought to the organization challenging environmental or public safety legislation on behalf of corporations, the corporations have won. When foreign commercial shrimp fishing interests challenged the protection of giant sea turtles in our endangered species act, the turtles didn't stand a chance. Critics of the IMF say that since the 1980's, the organization has been bailing out countries during financial crises with emergency loan packages that have specific conditions. With this assistance, countries have to follow the IMF's policies to get loans, international assistance, and even debt relief. The predictable consequences have always been disastrous. Tight monetary policy and skyrocketing interest rates not only stop productive investment, stampeding savings into short-run financial investment instead of long-term productive investment, it keeps many businesses from getting the kind of month-to-month loans needed to continue even ordinary operations. This fosters unemployment and drops in production and therefore income. Fiscal austerity-raising taxes and reducing government spending-further depresses aggregate demand, also leading to reductions in output and increases in unemployment. Likewise, if any of the government spending eliminated was actually improving people's lives, then reductions in those programs eliminates those benefits. Privatization of public utilities, transport, and banks is always accompanied by layoffs. Whether productivity and efficiency is improved in the long run depends on how badly the public enterprises were run in the first place, and if private operation proves to be an improvement. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree International Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree International Politics essays

  1. Health and Safety Policy and Practice - Competency

    Moreover, it was argued that '[r]eform should be aimed at creating the conditions for more effective self regulation by employers and employees jointly' (Hutter, 2004: 22). The intentions being to make those involved understand that health and safety matters are their own concerns and not just the remit of external agencies.

  2. In what ways did the institutional legacy of the Franco regime shape Spain(TM)s transition ...

    (ibid: 75) Radio and television were equally as monopolised by state control, however in 1966, a Press Law was drafted by Manuel Fraga, which has been seen as paving the way towards a relaxation of the government's censorship of the media, nevertheless, the government maintained its tight hold over the media (ibid: 75).

  1. Should the United States Get Involved with Problems in the Middle East?

    at least some of its leaders are not preaching "Death to America" in the mosques. A wise America will hold a heavy stick behind its back and in its hand as enticing a bunch of carrots as possible, including remission of debt, trade advantages, and political support against extremists.

  2. Caste in India

    This is dangerous in a country riddled with diversity. While caste is prevalent across the broad spectrum of religions in India, Ali argues that for non-Hindu communities caste bears much less impact. In Muslim communities, for example, caste is a weak source of economic, political or social resources.

  1. Has the role of interest groups in the United States corrupted the political process

    The officials elected do not owe their party anything for getting chosen, and are therefore free to act with independence. Both the Republican and Democrat parties are renowned for positioning themselves at the centre of the political spectrum so as to please as many voters as possible, and Congressmen often vote against the party line.

  2. Why Is the Middle East a Conflict Area?

    As a result tensions remained high and the deep animosity between the nations worsened. By siding with France and Britain and continuing to occupy the Gaza Strip between 1956 and 1957, the Israelis managed not only to further deepen the rift with Egypt but also to anger the USA, bringing a close relationship under severe pressure.

  1. Globalisation: fair trade

    The Fairtrade movement has become a widely debated phenomenon with critics divided. There is no doubt on the products ever growing popularity; one in two adults in the UK now recognize the brands kite marked symbol (Barrientos & Smith, 2007, p106), and the guardian recently reported that sales were up

  2. Convergence or Divergence: An Overview of the Positions of the EU Member States.

    The other elements of the "Future of Europe Debate" are important too and the narrow focus of this presentation should not be misconstrued as an attempt to relegate them. The Charter of Fundamental Rights, the question of whether to incorporate it in the Treaties or not, the issue of what

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work