• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assessment for PA

Extracts from this document...


For our assessment we performed two acts from the play "Blood wedding". Act one was performed using Stanislavski method of naturalism and act three was performed using Artuads method. From applying the Stanislavski rules to my own style of acting I thought will be challenging because when I perform I generally over exaggerate my movements. I realised that I did this therefore was able to improve my naturalistic performance by applying the IF rule to my own performance of "blood wedding". From researching a lot about Stanislavski I understand why he created such rules and techniques of naturalistic style of acting and if he had not of produced his techniques we could still be living in a mechanical acting world. In order to apply the Stanislavski technique to our own work I researched his method further. Stanislavski said an actor needs: good will, absolute peace of mind, attention, and fearlessness. ...read more.


This is in contrast with Artauds method of theatre. Artaud was anxious to make every detail as powerful and as meaningful as possible. The choreographed acting, the amplified sound and the extreme mood created by the lighting all contributed to the overall intention: drawing the audience into the action for a sensory experience. Applying this method of acting to our assessment was going to be fun but hard work. We decided to have our audience placed in the centre with their eyes shut. Us the actors would therefore be performing around them. Having your eyes shut in any situation where other people are around can be intimidating let alone with noise and flashing lights. I found this method of acting fun and easy to perform as it was over the top and you got to have fun with it and didn't have to restrict yourself and the audience may feel more involved as they are in the centre. ...read more.


This could have perhaps made our characters more believable to the audience but we did sustain our role of the character throughout. The subject matter was dealt with in an appropriate way and the emotions that were explored by the performer were realistic. Individual character analysis. Ruth performed "Miss Julie" using Artauds method: She sustained a good focus throughout the performance and managed to keep her concentration although she was playing such a dramatic character. She created a character that the audience could sympathise with. It became a very emotional piece of drama to engage. Her facial expression was very interesting and added great depth to her performance. She could have projected her voice slightly louder so the audience could understand her throughout as at some points in the performance it became hard to hear what she was saying and therefore did affect her performance. Overall Ruth made her performance emotional for the audience to watch and was quite touching, you got a real sense of realness and she became the character. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Plays section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Plays essays

  1. Film Studies The Studio System

    Mayer, Irving Thalberg * Directors: George Cukor, Frank Borzage * Actresses: Greta Garbo, Joan Crawford, Norma Shearer, Myrna Loy, Jean Harlow * Actors: Clark Gable, Robert Taylor, William Powell, Walter Pidgeon, Melvyn Douglas, Spencer Tracy, Mickey Rooney, James Stewart * Typical Films: Camille, Grand Hotel, Dinner at Eight, Mutiny on

  2. Comparative Study of Offstage Action in The Cherry Orchard and Miss Julie

    In terms of The Cherry Orchard, there exist a few instances of character reflection. For example, the opening scene has Lopakhin, the once-a-peasant-now-a-prosperous-businessman, telling Dunyasha, the chambermaid of the estate, about an event that occurred when he was a child.

  1. Detail your understanding of the Given Circumstances and the Magic 'If' in the Stanislavski ...

    Somewhere familiar? How does it feel? Am I hot or cold? Comfortable or uncomfortable? What has just happened? How do I feel about what has just happened? What do I expect to happen in the next few moments? Etc. By asking themselves questions like this, the actor is able to

  2. 'What did Stanislavski mean by Imagination and Concentration/Attention? How could these ideas help in ...

    'All this must be made fuller and deeper by the actor. In this creative process imagination leads the actor.' When preparing a role, research therefore had to be done into every aspect of the character.

  1. In the light of your study of Stanislavski and after seeing Miss Julie how ...

    This is from the social context of the play, where many women believed they needed a husband to achieve true happiness, and also a husband would result in Olga not needing a job. To show this in the play I will show Olga being extremely interested in Tuzenback and flirtatiously behaving with him as he talks about Vershinin.

  2. How did your role emerge and how was it communicated?

    in fact after the third rehearsal we didn't talk much at all. It was strange to see how different members of the cast responded to the pressure. Some used to storm out at least twice a lesson, others would sit in the corner dishing out genuinely cutting frowns.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work