• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and Contrast the ways in which Sherriff and Whelan present Stanhopes and Tom Hackfords attitudes to and perception of the war.

Extracts from this document...


Compare and Contrast the ways in which Sherriff and Whelan present Stanhope’s and Tom Hackford’s attitudes to, and perception of, the war. To what extent would you agree that the characterization of Stanhope’s attitudes and perception are more credible than those of Tom Hackford? Both R.C Sherriff and Peter Whelan in `Journey’s End` and `The Accrington Pals` use the characters Stanhope and Hackford to present the way war is perceived on stage through the perceptions of other characters and of stage through the perception of the audience. Stanhope and Hackford are also used to affect the way the audience perceives the Great War. The main themes that are presented in both plays through Stanhope and Hackford concern the devaluation of the lives of the soldiers serving in the frontline. Whelan and Sherriff use Stanhope and Hackford to present anti-heroism. Stanhope’s character is more credible than Hackford’s. This is because Stanhope’s character is far more authentic than Hackford’s. Hackford is a naïve young man who believes that The Great War is beneficial for the needs of society to become more cooperative although Hackford is unaware of the cost the Great War will bring; the death of many. On the other hand Stanhope is an officer who is renowned for his experience on the frontline. ...read more.


`We all feel like you do sometimes, if you only knew. I hate and loathe it all. ` Stanhope shows his conscience because he can sympathize with those who cannot cope with the difficulties war brings for example the character Hibbert. Stanhope can understand living in this war can be emotionally strenuous because he himself has experienced the strain that this war brings. Stanhope?s understanding makes his argument more credible because he is able to support his claim as he himself has had years of service in the frontline. His argument is made more credible because other characters around him share the same perspective. On the other hand Hackford, because of his expressive character, is able to deliver with confidence, his positive perspective concerning the war although Hackford lacks the experience to support his beliefs; as a result his argument suffers. `It?s a free exchange of skills? of produce of hands or brains. That?s what?s needed. Not money. `Hackford use of short sentencing creates a sense of confidence and clear understanding which strengthens his argument. Hackford believes that there is no use in money. He believes the free exchange of skills will create a society that is more cooperative rather than a society that is autonomous. `They can?t see further than they know. ...read more.


They have to bring everything down to the particular. If you try to explain the theory of free exchange of skills they think you?re talking Chinese. ` Hackford mocks the social system put in place in Britain. Hackford is displeased because of social restrictions that do not allow society to cooperate towards a common cause. Hackford believes that the war will create the opportunity for society to come together for a common cause. Hackford?s prediction is true because of the idea of total war; the home front aided the war effort, for example women working in munitions factories. Hackford believes that the warfront is the only place that will satisfy his need for `free exchange. ` In conclusion Stanhope and Hackford are used to criticize the war. Stanhope is the more credible than Hackford?s because his arguments are typical of the perspective shared by post war writers. Stanhope is also more credible because of the experience that he has compared to the little experience Hackford has. Hackford?s perspective will be most definitely different if he too had experienced war as much as Stanhope. Hackford is used to present the perception of the young hopeful generation that were excited by the idea of going to war. Hackford presents the perceptions of typical of pre-war Britain. Whereas Stanhope is representative of the soldiers who have experienced the war and have become aware of the damage the Great War has inflicted. Stanhope exhibits perceptions that are typical of post war Britain. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Synoptic Paper section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Synoptic Paper essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Henry V compared to the War Poets. Throughout 'Henry V' there are very ...

    4 star(s)

    He aimed to show the reality and horrors of war in his poems for all participants, the most notable being 'Dulce Et Decorum Est'. Owen questions how such pain and degradation be justified. In his poem 'Anthem For Doomed Youth', Owen presents a world devoid of divine order and intervention; a h**l on earth.

  2. Tim O'Brien's 'The Things They Carried' and Pat Barker's 'Regeneration'. Compare and contrast the ...

    In this case, I believe that O'Brien is referring to the oppressive weight of an American society which wants to forget all about a war which devastated a generation. This reluctance to remember is embodied in the 'polite' town which has 'no memory, therefore no guilt[xxi].'

  1. Air of pessimism present in Waiting for Godot and The Wasteland

    stand out from the rest because the 'l' sounds enact the idea of lyrically sighing. Paradoxically, life seems to struggle out of death. Eliot expresses this idea well by the physical imagery he uses to describe the landscape: 'lilacs.' This is a symbol of freshness and vigour and it is bred 'out of the dead land.'

  2. Free essay

    Explore the ways Peter Whelan presents the complacency of the home front in The ...

    In Birdsong explains that '800 men in the battalion who had gone over the parapet, 155 answered their names.' This puts the audience in a state of shock, due to the magnitude of death. The brutality of war is shown in the effect that it had on the home front,

  1. Explore the ways in which Journeys End presents ideas about heroism. Compare and contrast ...

    He is both a hardened and troubled officer who entered the war with the intention of being heroic, yet turned to alcohol as a coping mechanism.

  2. Compare and Contrast the Presentation of the Relationship between Raleigh and Stanhope in Journeys ...

    This character type clashes with Stanhope, who has already been serving for 'nearly three years,' without a rest. During the first scene of the play, Osborne and Hardy have a conversation which introduces many of the themes of the play, including the character of Stanhope.

  1. Compare and contrast the different ways in which Resistance and On The Black Hill ...

    eighteenth century model-and offered him £5.’ This could also perhaps be reflected in Benjamin’s draft to the British army. He can be seen as a metaphor for the English oppression of the Welsh, and his resistance to the army can be seen as symbolic of the Welsh resistance to English cultural influence.

  2. No war is identical to another but having read Tim OBriens On the Rainy ...

    27. In ?The Man I Killed? Azar is a complete fanatic; while at war he definitely crosses the line between patriotism and fanaticism. When Tim killed the innocent ?academic? of the Vietnamese republican guard, he was thrilled, stating, ?Oh man, you f****n? trashed the f****r?.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work