Explore how Heaney writes about childhood experiences in Death of a Naturalist and in one other poem of your choice. In your Response you should include discussion of the following:

Authors Avatar

Explore how Heaney writes about childhood experiences in Death of a Naturalist and in one other poem of your choice. In your Response you should include discussion of the following:

  • Descriptive elements
  • Use of language and structure

   Heaney writes about childhood experiences in Death of a Naturalist and Blackberry-Picking. Death of a Naturalist is concerned with growing up and loss of innocence. The poet vividly describes a childhood experience that precipitates a change in the boy from the receptive and protected innocence of childhood to the fear and uncertainty of adolescence. Similarly, Blackberry picking is about hope and disappointment and easily becomes a metaphor for other experiences. Both poems are organised in two sections corresponding to the change. Death of a Naturalist opens with an evocation of summer landscape which has the immediacy of an actual childhood experience. There is also a sense of exploration in which is consistent with the idea of learning inevitable leading to discovery and troubled awareness of experience. In the second section everything changes and the world is now a threatenting place, full of ugliness and meance. There is still a strong emphasis on decay and putrefaction, but now its not balanced by images suggesting profusion of life.

Join now!

Similar to the Death of a Naturalist, Blackberry picking begins with the description of the season. This sets the scene so the poet can begin to describe the picking of blackberries from the apperance of the first fruit to the frenzy of activity as more fruit ripens. The second section concerns the attempt to preserve the berries which is always a failure, as the fungus set in and the fruit fermented.

The poem is ambiguous in its viewpoint. We see the view of a frustrated child in “I...felt like crying” and “It wasn't fair”, but a more detached adult view ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

Avatar

The Quality of Written Communication is good. The candidate's use fo grammar, spelling and punctuation indicate someone whose literacy level is very high. They have a good understand of how to shape effective analysis with the discourse feeling clunky, and their use of technical terminology indicates proficiency and confidence in their analytical writing skills.

The Level of Analysis shown is very good, and the candidate delves to extensive depth s to consider the language and the tone of the piece. I like how they integrate structural analysis here, commenting on how the tone of the piece changes between the stanzas, and that the break in the middle represents a large gap in time for 'Death of a Naturalist', signalling the ended of innocence and the introduction of fear and paranoia and for 'Blackberry Picking' it represents a transition between the knowledge-hungry optimism of youth and maturation, maturation which features longing for said youth that has passed. All in all, a very nicely-written essay, with a powerful understanding of the poems and a really engaging discourse to carry the analysis. I found myself eager to read what the candidate has to say due to their innovative use of powerful, interesting language in analysis, saving their essay from slipping by as just another of many essays on the same poems that examiners will have to mark. Using interesting and engaging language will help your essay stand out, and will help the examiner become more invested in it, making the marking more accurate.

The candidate's answer here is extremely well-augmented and very proficient in it's analysis. The candidate draws many comparisons between the poems, as well as recognising how each serve to represents the loss of innocence, or the loss of something worth treasuring. The candidate expresses their ideas clearly, sharing the analysis between the two poems nicely as they identify themes, language devices, tones and structural features that contribute to the effect on the reader. There is a careful analysis of language, but less so on structure. This is not something to be disappointed by as there is relatively little to say about structure (that is not already mentioned), though some contextual appreciation wouldn't go amiss. What does Heaney's upbringing tell us about his attachment to nature? Why does nature feature so heavily in these two poems? In all his poems? Just a few points to be added here and there - most of them simply need to be integrated into what it already a very good essay - and this could easily be a high grade A essay for A Level.