Write a comparison of "The Handsomest Drowned Man in the World" and "The Drowned Giant", commenting on the ways in which the authors use language to convey their respective themes.

Authors Avatar

                                Christina Taryoto 11Q

Write a comparison of “The Handsomest Drowned Man in the World” and “The Drowned Giant”, commenting on the ways in which the authors use language to convey their respective themes.

The Handsomest Drowned Man in the World by Gabriel Marquez and The Drowned Giant by J.G. Ballard are both short stories that explore the ways in which societies react to the arrival of something different in their communities. The Handsomest Drowned Man in the World is about a man who washed ashore near a small village and the impact of the man’s presence, which helps the villagers to revive their dreary and barren village into a beautiful and lively place. In The Drowned Giant a giant washes ashore on the beach near a city; naturally this causes attention from city dwellers and the media. The narrator is a researcher who provides critical commentary on the giant’s presence and the crowd’s behavior towards him. This essay is a comparison of The Handsomest Drowned Man in the World and The Drowned Giant that will include commentary on the ways in which the authors use language to convey their respective themes. Certain aspects of each story will be compared such as characterization, setting, plot and style.

Characterization plays a significant role in both stories that helps to augment their respective themes. Throughout The Drowned Giant we see through the eyes of the narrator, who visits the giant’s body frequently and provides a very vivid and precise report of each day. He describes how the crowds were, “clambering all over the giant”, bruising his face and even “jostling each other in and out of the orbits”. Despite this amazing incident their actions prove that they have no respect for the giant or even care about his origins. Ballard portrays them as abusive, insensitive and prejudiced. At times the narrator refers to them as “spectators”, which likens them to people who watch games, or shows and don’t get emotionally involved. Furthermore, Ballard skillful use of figurative language becomes more apparent as he vividly illustrates this image. At one point, he describes the townsfolk sitting on the giant’s face “like flies”. At first the reader might think that Ballard is using the simile to emphasize the giants colossal size, but it could also mean the crowd’s behavior is annoying, repulsive and disrespectful. Again he uses a simile about the crowd, “covering the arms and legs like a dense flock of seagulls”. Ballard is comparing the crowd to scavengers. This further emphasizes the main theme of how societies react to something that is different. The narrator reports that a young man was standing on the tip of the giant’s nose and waving to his friends. Here, Ballard is suggesting that society tends to conquer The reader realizes that they’re more interested in exploiting the giant for their personal gain than trying to learn about him as a human being.

Join now!

On the other hand the narrator feelings contrast with the crowd; he is fascinated with the giant’s “Grecian features”, “the enormous breadth of the shoulders”, and his “magnificent Homeric stature”. When Ballard reveals why the narrator has such a “particular interest in the case” is because of  “ the mere categorical fact of his existence”. It is here that the reader understands that the narrator is more broadminded, Ballard makes him aware of the giant absolute exists. It becomes apparent that the narrator is more fascinated with the answers that the giant may be able to tell him, unlike the ...

This is a preview of the whole essay