You will analyse three different productions of 'hamlet' you have seen, Considering the dramatic effectiveness of hamlet's "to be or not to be" Soliloquy and the "Nunnery" scene.

Authors Avatar

English: GCSE Hamlet coursework:

Task: You will analyse three different productions of 'hamlet' you have seen, Considering the dramatic effectiveness of hamlet's "to be or not to be" Soliloquy and the "Nunnery" scene. Through answering the following questions, decide which production you consider to be the most effective.

  • What setting does each director choose and how does this contribute to the overall effect?
  • What does the soliloquy show the audience about Hamlet's state of mind and motivations and how is this conveyed to the audience in each production?
  • What impression is given in each production of the relationship between Hamlet and Ophelia and their motivations for behaving the way they do?
  • Which Production do you think makes the nunnery scene and the soliloquy most moving for a modern audience?

Our three productions of William Shakespeare's 'Hamlet' were Michael Almereyda's 2000 production staring Ethan Hawke and Julia Styles, Franco Zefferelli's 1990 film with  Mel Gibson and Helena Bonham Carter, and Kenneth Brannagh's 1998 production where he himself played Hamlet and Kate Winslet played Ophelia.

In Zefferelli's production Mel Gibson plays Hamlet in a medieval Danish castle. This gives a certain feeling of tradition and heritage throughout, and seems to emphasise the stature of a royal family. The film begins with the funeral of Hamlet's father in an old chamber underneath the castle, where many bodies lay to rest and in the centre of this is Hamlet's Father's Crypt. Many are stood mourning, and Hamlet is leaning upon the crypt weeping, and glaring at his mother in a very aggressive manner. This displays Hamlets feelings of disgust and hatred toward his mother at this point who is in the arms of Claudius. I think to choose to open this production this way rather than with the appearance of the ghost as in Shakepeare's text not only keeps the film more original rather than a word for word remake, it also helps to let the audience relate to the characters better. It allows them to be seen in this fragile, delicate state which helps the audience to see what kind of people they really are, especially Hamlet whose mental disposition is made all the more visible and the audience can grasp this concept more easily because of this one scene.

         In the Brannagh version Hamlet is the prince in a Palace in the 1840's, the Costume is much more grand and extravagant which gives, again, a feeling of high stature, Which helps emphasise the characters nobility. Hamlet uses the huge palace to lose himself and be alone with his thoughts a lot, yet it has somewhat of a romancing effect on the scenes involving Ophelia

Join now!

The Hawke version is in a modern city, New York, and although he is not a prince, he is a hugely rich and well-known person, and his Father owns a large business called the Denmark Corporation and is very wealthy. Almereyda uses bars and nightclubs and interweaves the language into today's setting, using technology in place of imagery, e.g using a wire on Ophelia rather than eavesdropping in the same room. This approach is certainly very original, and gives a personal touch to the film, but in my opinion it loses the tense atmosphere than a more traditional approach ...

This is a preview of the whole essay