Placing nuclear weapons in Cuba was a reckless piece of international gambling by Khrushchev that achieved nothing of significance for the USSR. How valid is this view?

Authors Avatar

‘Placing nuclear weapons in Cuba was a reckless piece of international gambling by Khrushchev that achieved nothing of significance for the USSR.’ How valid is this view?

The statement is valid because the decision brought the world the closest it had ever been to nuclear war and the whole fiasco genuinely terrified people on a global scale, not just those in the affiliated countries. However there is a counter argument and that is the fact that the USSR did achieve the removal of missiles from turkey and that nuclear did not actually happen which is more valid making what Khrushchev less of a gamble and also achieving ground for the USSR.

Firstly the placement of the nuclear weapons in Cuba can be seen as a gamble when taken into account one of the factors that encouraged the Soviet Union to put the missiles in Cuba is to show to China that they were still the lead communist nation and could protect a revolution. This is an incredible risk to put nuclear arms so close to the USA and risk a possibility of nuclear war to impress China, although this obviously wasn’t the main reason it still was a factor.

Join now!

The protection of Cuba and its communist revolution was also in the mind of Khrushchev when installing the weapons into Cuba, however a large amount of the worry surrounding the situation could have been lessened if conventional weapons were used instead due to there being a lessened opinion of regular military forces because at the time all of the media and worry was about nuclear arms and the damage a nuclear war could to do everyone on a global scale.

The weapons were further a gamble as this came so close to what had happened the previous year in Berlin ...

This is a preview of the whole essay