• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

' But everyman has his price.' Show the part that corruption plays in the action of A Man for All Seasons.

Extracts from this document...


' But everyman has his price.' Show the part that corruption plays in the action of A Man for All Seasons. The statement 'everyman has his price' suggests that all humans are capable of being corrupted. Humans then succumb to certain temptations: greed, power, deception, bribery, betrayal and self-interest. Often men fall prey to such temptations in search of material comfort at the expense of spiritual comfort. More himself comments upon these temptations in the text: "But since in fact we see that avarice, anger, envy, pride, sloth, trust and stupidity commonly profit far beyond humility, charity, fortitude, justice and thought and have to choose, to be human at all" He says that not to succumb to these, would make one a hero or at least more than a common man. More did not aim to live up to being a hero, but he stood by his moral codes and did not succumb to such temptations. Throughout the play, attempts are made to corrupt More. Such attempts to corrupt morals and religious beliefs occur mainly because of the Kings desire to remarry. Henry married his brothers widow which was disallowed by the Catholic Church-however the Pope eventually gave dispensation for the marriage of Henry and Catherine to take place. Now Henry wants a divorce, to enable him to marry Anne Boleyn and to secure an heir. This creates a dilemma and the King wants the backing of More, which we see when Henry is speaking with More "Touching this matter of my divorce, Thomas; have you ...read more.


Alice and Margaret want More to agree with the King and to forget his principles. Their reason for this is for their family safety. Alice tries to convince her husband to capitulate with the King "You can fit the cap to anyone you want" and accuses him of being 'cruel' to the household. More asks Alice to remove his chain: "h**l's fire-God's blood and body no!" "...Is this wisdom to betray your ability, abandon practice, forget your station and your duty to your kin and behave like a printed book!" Alice is scared of loosing her position and becoming a pauper and because of this she tries to corrupt More. More is only human and Alice only wants her husband to do what she feels is best for the family and the country therefore she will not remove the chain. More, though, is acting like 'a printed book' and he will not accept bribes or money from the Church. Margaret knows that Sir Thomas is going to resign anyway and to show her love and respect for her father, she removes the chain although she knows it will lead to her poverty. More feels it necessary to resign because it was his way of resisting severing the connection with Rome and Chapuys encourages Mores resignation saying he could not believe that More 'will allow himself to be associated with the recent actions of King Henry'. More too, does not want to be associated with the corrupted King. ...read more.


because it ultimately would benefit the country. More answers this: "When statesmen forsake their own private conscience for the sake of their own public duties...they lead their country by short route to chaos" More does not agree with Wolsey and even these reasons are unacceptable. Of all the character in the play, More is the only one who does not succumb to corruption. It would have been the easy option for More agree and comply with the King, but the strength of his religious and personal morals meant more to him. He was respected for these attributes and did not want to loose this. He also felt that ultimately God was his judge. This play is about political dalliance rather than fast moving action, "The interval started early in the year 1530 and it's now the middle of May 1532.Two years." It is about corruptive persuasion that More resists and ultimately leads to his execution. This is shown at the beginning of act 2: The political dalliance of the play is instigated by More not giving in to coercion, persuasion or even temptation. Ultimately, according to his own definition, More is a hero: "If we lived in a State where virtue was profitable, common sense would make us good, and greed would make us saintly. And we'd live like animals or angels in the happy land that needs no heroes." He lived up to his rules and the rules of his religion, however unhappy he has made those around him. 'Everyman has his price' except More, or was it his life that was the price he had to pay? A Man for all Seasons Nicola Mooney ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. How do the poets in 'Charlotte O'Neils song' and 'Nothing Changed' show their feelings ...

    So, first of all the reader can see how unfair it is. The poet also makes her feelings clear by the sheer joy she has in telling the employer that she is leaving and from now on she can do her dirty work herself.

  2. Death is Part of the Process

    Another man was driving them through the rain-wet streets of South London. The two officers that sat in the back of the van with Danny were trainee police officers just like Danny. The officer driving in the front was older and more experienced than the three in the back, but on a job like this, they waited on Danny's instructions.

  1. Heaven to Hell

    The only method of transport he was to walk of float around as he did. There seamed to be some force moving him around, some sort of guide which taught him the place he had entered to familiarize him with it and what he could do.

  2. Was Oliver Cromwell a hero or a villain?

    . In this matter, (he says) that he acted on God's behalf. Cromwell was also taking revenge because the Irish has "English Protestant blood on their hands". Cromwell also said that he acted by the rules of war and takes responsibility on what happened. Cromwell was also greeted as a hero after the massacre.

  1. Warner Bros.' GoodFellas (1990) is director Martin Scorsese's stylistic masterpiece - a follow-up film ...

    And that's what it's all about. That's what the FBI could never understand. That what Paulie and the organization does is offer protection for people who can't go to the cops. That's it. That's all it is. They're like the police department for wiseguys. Henry is commissioned to break the windows of cabs in a rival cab company and set them on fire.

  2. Man for all seasons

    "god d**n it man. It's disproportionate." Norfolk has no problem taking a pledge and crossing his fingers and cannot see why More objects to it so passionately in the face of all that accept it. Norfolk's view of his world was very accepting.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work