Explain why Stalin and not Trotsky emerged as Lenin's successor

Authors Avatar

Explain why Stalin and not Trotsky emerged as Lenin’s successor

Trotsky in Lenin’s eyes was probably the right man to run Russia after his death even if he had some doubts about his political judgement. Flexibility, intelligence and pragmaticism were included in Trotsky’s many qualities and he was recognised by Lenin as the saviour of the revolution. Stalin on the other hand seemed an unlikely successor. Lenin and Stalin did not get on personally and in Lenin’s Testament Lenin cautioned against Stalin and advocated his removal from the post of General secretary. However with Lenin gone Trotsky suffered a number of disadvantages and, although Stalin was the underdog, he had a number of advantages which led to him becoming Lenin’s Successor.

The first problem Trotsky had was that in many respects he became a victim of his own success. While he was successfully managing the war he was distant from the Politburo and at the end of the war was in many respects a hero without a role. His very popularity with and control over the Red Army which should have been a benefit in a leader ship struggle was actually a draw back.

Join now!

Trotsky was unpopular with the older members of the party who feared he would use the red army to become a dictator. The fact that Trotsky only joined the Bolshevik party in 1917 also worried a umber of party members. These issues were most significant in relation to Kamenev and Zinoviev the leaders of the Communist party in Moscow and Petrograd. They feared and disliked Trotsky and allied with Stalin to prevent him becoming leader.

Stalin’s major advantage, on the other hand, was his position inside the Bolshevik party. Although General Secretary was not thought of as ...

This is a preview of the whole essay