Another way Henry tried to tame his nobility was in is his use of bonds along with recognisance’s. Both of these, Henry VII did not make, they were already in place, having said that Henry VII exploited them for all they were worth. As Pendrill says, "Henry was the law” meaning that he could put both bonds and recognisance’s on whoever he saw fit, and furthermore, "The victim had no right of appeal". In contrast to Henry VI (who had 22 peers under bonds) and Edward IV and Richard III (who both had 20 peers under bonds), Henry VII managed to gain 46 peers under bonds. He gained an impressive sum of money over these years. In 1507 he fined Lord Burgavenny £70,000 however, as he couldn’t afford to pay it, the kind took £500 a year for 10 years as his payment. By having control over this not only brought in money but also gave others a taste of his authority.
However, Henry became king as a usurper and was an outsider to the English political system; he could not shake off the fact he had taken the throne. Also as he had been in exile in France for many years he had little trust in people. Instead of employing high status nobles for his government he granted these special powers to people like his mother and his uncle – Jasper Tudor. Although this may have seemed like a good way to diminish power from the nobility, in reality it just formed a bigger gap between him and his nobles. It can’t be said that they did not do a good job as Henrys government but all kings needed political support from their nobility as well as technical advise from clergy and lawyers and all those people he took on where not skilled enough to recommend suitable instructions. Henry may have chosen people faithful to him but by distancing himself from the nobles only left him with less advice and their anger of not being noblemen.
At court Henry was an outsider. As he became distrustful of his nobility he withdrew from court more and more. Especially in the second half of his reign, Henrys court had more in common with France and Burgundy than it did with England – this is obviously the opposite of what you want an English court to be. After the execution of William Stanley in 1495 there was a serious change in the courts layout. This would have meant that as Henry withdrew from court, his noblemen would have needed to step up to make the decisions – this would have given them more power! As Henry started to spend most of his time in his Privy Chamber the nobility had little access to him and because of this they had to react to events rather than shaping them. They had to take control in order to keep things running smoothly!
In conclusion, Henry VII did somewhat managed to reduce the power of his nobility. Not only did he used attainders effectively in order to gain land/money as well as authority but he also cleverly used bonds and recognisance’s, which led him to gain a good amount of people on his peerage. Through these acts he showed that HE was the king. However, he was frequently away from his court and put a lot of extra work onto others. It was left a lot of the time for the nobility to pick up the pieces. Overall, he did do a lot to reduce the power of the nobility but his distrust in them made it difficult for his to get a result.