• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"It was not so much that Labour won the General Election of 1945, but that Churchill and the Conservatives lost it." Assess the validity of this view.

Extracts from this document...


"It was not so much that Labour won the General Election of 1945, but that Churchill and the Conservatives lost it." Assess the validity of this view. The question of who "won" or "lost" the election is essentially a question of whether the election result was more of a failure of the Conservative party, or a success of the Labour party. Although it could be argued, as in source C, that "Labour's campaign had a much more modern look to it with a much wider appeal to the community as a whole", and so Labour were more successful at capturing the support of voters than the Conservatives, one could also argue that the election was really the Conservatives' to lose (they were widely seen as "the natural party of government", and had Winston Churchill, an extremely popular wartime Prime Minister, to their credit), and their various failures at campaigning and appeal were their undoing. The Labour Party had many positive advantages over the Conservatives, as listed in source B, the first being "the wartime experience". ...read more.


Overall, then, it is arguable that the 1945 election result was generally reflective of a positive swell of support for Labour than a negative reaction to a Conservative failure. It is worth noting that many of those who voted in the 1945 election were new voters who only became eligible to vote after the last election (which was ten years before in 1935). Thus much of the voting population were not habitual voters for any party, and it could be said that the result merely illustrated the gradual change which had taken place in the ten years between the two elections (the swing was in fact less pronounced than it seemed - Labour had been leading in polls for many years preceding the elections). The Conservatives, in contrast, had been damaged in a number of ways by the war. The party machinery, previously well-oiled and efficient, had been allowed to disintegrate - the Party did not hold annual conferences throughout the war coalition, and many of those who would run the local party branches (who in the Conservatives' case were often middle class and in non-reserved occupations) ...read more.


Finally, the proportion of votes to seats was very skewed in favour of Labour, making the victory appear more overwhelming than it was. The Conservatives still gained ten million votes (source A shows) to Labour's twelve million, so it was not the case that the Conservatives had lost a great deal of support by the end of the war - it was more the case that Labour had gained more support; the Conservatives had not been resoundingly defeated - Labour had just managed to beat them. Overall, then, the factors contributing to the 1945 election result can more easily support an opposite view to the one presented, because they portray the vote as a positive one for Labour rather than a negative one for the Conservatives. However, there is no reason why the election could not have been both won by Labour and lost by the Conservatives - indeed, it is hard to see how it could not have been both. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Why did Labour win the 1945 election and lose in the 1951 election?

    were left effectively to their own devices to rule the homefront as Churchill struggled on with the war effort. Atlee became the deputy Prime Minister during the war. In addition, Morrison became Home Secretary and Bevin Minister of Labour and National Service.

  2. Blairism won power with a smile and platitude but in the end, he left ...

    He also ensured legal restrictions in place on trade unions were maintained which was put in place by Thatcher while introducing the cult of Blair 'inclusiveness', 'stakeholder society' and 'forces of conservatism' . Despite this however, voters were arguably dissatisfied due to various corruption.

  1. 'It was not the liberals who won but the conservatives who lost' discuss

    The war had split the Liberal party and they were unable to agree, so therefore the best option at that time was the Conservatives. As the war went on it became costly both in lives and money, the war eventually cost Britain �200 million and over 20,000 British lives were lost.

  2. The Successes of Labour from 1945

    NHS hospitals would also be able to have a number of 'pay beds' and private wards. The medical profession was given a central role in the administration of the NHS. Overall, the NHS that emerged in 1948 was noticeably less 'socialist' than Bevan's first proposals had indicated.

  1. Account for the crushing defeat of the Conservatives in the general election of 1906

    Some English Non Conformists refused to pay their taxes, in Wales a whole campaign was set up by David Lloyd George, a Liberal MP, to oppose the 1902 education act. In 1904 the licensing act also angered the Non Conformist voters.

  2. Why did The Labour Party win the General Election in 1945?

    Even though it was written in 1942, The Labour Party was very much associated with the report with it, with their slogan "Freedom From Want". The Conservatives were less associated with the report and by 1945, were still associated with those who did well out of society.

  1. Why did the Conservatives lose the 1929 election?

    This was a major reason why they lost the election, their campaign did not focus on their policies but rather attacked the Liberal ones. Lloyd George?s campaign hurt the Conservatives as 33 out of 35 Liberal gains were at the expense of Conservative candidates.

  2. Explain why the Tories won the General Election in 1957,

    I think the age of the economic prosperity proving ?life was better? with the conservatives was the most paramount factor that contributed to their victory. On top of the economic prosperity, Macmillan?s political achievements were also pivotal in him securing his second term in office.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work