• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Napoleon a Great General?

Extracts from this document...


Was Napoleon a Great General? Napoleon inherited an army which made up for its lack of skills simply through its huge numbers. The Levee ´┐Żn mass, an early form of conscription, was responsible for this. As soon as Napoleon gained power he began reforming the army. Owing to his large political power he was able to pass laws very easily. However, later on he found that being both General and politician had its drawbacks. Napoleon's army was split into divisions. This made supplying easier, as supplies were ordered for a division rather than an army, although the coordination of attacks across divisions was obviously made more difficult. Furthermore a corp. system, seemly confusing the matter further, was implemented. It consisted of 3 infantry divisions, 1 cavalry division and 46 guns. One corp. had enough firepower to survive by itself and several could spread out to forage for greater self-sufficiency. Foraging was so successful for Napoleon that in the Prussian and Polish campaigns the armies actually made money for the government. When these corps were combined they could attack from separate directions cutting supply lines and causing general panic and confusion, as was seen at Austerlitz. ...read more.


From the size of the French and her army it was clear she could not take on the world. What did Napoleon hope to gain from this next endeavour? French land had tripled, was it true Napoleon had neither aims nor limits to his conquest. This failure of any realistic objectives ultimately led to his defeat and was a grave failing as a general. The Russians refused to stand and fight and give Napoleon the victory he so wanted. Instead they retreated 400 miles from the frontier. Crippled by cold, fever and exhaustion the few soldiers who reached Moscow retreated, partly through fear of being cut off but also because when they saw Moscow in flames (set alight by the Russians to prevent it falling into French hands). This campaign was not just a loss but a disaster. The hundreds of thousands of men now dead had been drawn from the Spanish campaign. Napoleon's failure to secure the Spanish front before opening another front, achievable with his overwhelming numbers, cost him dearly. Subsequently, at the Battle of Leipzig, some of Napoleon's faults were further revealed. ...read more.


In conclusion, Napoleon was certainly a great battlefield tactician. Examples of his genius could be seen at Aboukir, where he used the sea as his ally, or later when he won decisive victories such as at Jena Auerstadt and Austerlitz where, in hilly country, he could feint, wheel, surprise and outflank. But gradually his tactics became predictable and when battles were forced onto flat plains (Leipzig) or attacking uphill (Waterloo) every movement could be seen and so his advantages were lost. More importantly, Napoleon's ability to handle the more strategic aspects of the war, as opposed to deploying his troops on the specific battlefield, was sometimes suspect. Although he tried not to open up more than one front at a time or fight a large coalition of allied countries, he can be criticised for being drawn into an attack on Russia before Spain's resistance had been completely silenced - his superiority in numbers was significantly weakened as a consequence. Maybe Napoleon's true flaw was that he lacked any real aims in prosecuting the war - as he opened up new fronts with no apparent limit he simply increased the numbers of enemies determined to defeat France. Ian Chandler ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. "To what extent did napoleon lose the battle of Waterloo due to his own ...

    Back in Paris, Louis XVIII heard of the overwhelming support towards Napoleon and fled to Belgium where he would be under British protection. On March 20, 1815 Napoleon and his followers entered Paris ending the journey of 720 miles. Almost immediately after he resumed the throne, Napoleon found himself ringed by guns.

  2. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    When Sir John Moore arrived to take over the English force, even the presence of Napoleon himself (in November) could not prevent French plans being wrecked. * Moore paid particular attention to two important matters. Napoleon didn't. Napoleon failed to grasp the geography of Spain and its sheer size.

  1. "To what extent was French defeat at the battle of Waterloo due to Napoleons ...

    who believe that blame could be apportioned to his subordinates for their poor performance. Even if you take the view that individual commanders should take responsibilities for their own actions, would Napoleon have commanded the troops any better? The part of the battle he did command personally was in no way decisive.

  2. How successful was Napoleon III?

    Then in 1867 the Senate and the Corps Legislatif could were given the power to question a minister on government policy whenever they felt it necessary to, this was followed by the relaxation of laws against press censorship and public meetings.

  1. Why did the Franco-Prussian war happen and why were the Prussians able to defeat ...

    these powers were trying to suppress the rebellion in their territory, and a war with Austria in 1859 managed to alienate Austria. Britain, the most powerful nation in the world at this time, mistrusted France due to Napoleon seeking French expansion, and any French expansion would become a threat to

  2. To What Extent was Napoleon Master of Europe

    They did not hurry to make it an established religion, as Britain had done. In doing so, the Concordat also allowed protestants and Jews to practice their religion and retain their civil rights and freedoms. This settled the argument between the religions and once again, people of different backgrounds were

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work