• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

With close reference to the cases of Shaw v DPP and Knuller v DPP , Show how the law relates to morals and religion.

Extracts from this document...


11/18/2012 With close reference to the cases of Shaw v DPP and Knuller v DPP , Show how the law relates to morals and religion. What is the relation of law to morality? Law?s relation to morality has been debated ever since jurisprudence itself came to be and it seems as though it is destined to remain as one of the great philosophical debates. They are mutually engaged along a course that winds through a political society?s life. Laws are generally based on the moral principles of society. Both regulate the conduct of the individual in society. They influence each other to a great extent. Laws, to be effective, must represent the moral ideas of the people. But good laws sometimes serve to rouse the moral conscience of the people and create and maintain such conditions as may encourage the growth of morality. However, it is said that not because something is immoral that makes it illegal, example: pre-marital sex, neglecting your family and adultery are just a few. Sometimes morality can influence the law in the sense that it can provide the reason for making whole groups of immoral actions illegal. ...read more.


Fifthly, laws are studied under Jurisprudence while morality is studied under Ethics. How really is law and religion connected? The religion of the European colonizers was and still continues to be Christianity, which is said to have influenced the English law. This religious influence was so strong that religious rules were given statutory force and validity. For example, the religious rules ?thou shalt not steal? and ?thou shalt not kill? have been made law. Although law and religion are often said to be separate, it is important for the government to discuss the relationship between the two. In order for separation to be set in place between law and religion, the government has to sit down and devise these formulas that are going to promote the separation. In the government?s discussion about laws and religion, it is important that whatever new laws that are composed in regards to law and religion still hold true to giving people the religious freedom that they want. The separation between laws and religion is about making sure that the people are content with the decisions that they make. ...read more.


Secondly, The Supreme Court has gone on to pass further sanctions in regards to laws and religion throughout the years. Lastly, in the government?s discussion about law and religion, something that is at the heart of the discussion is what is acceptable in terms of religious displays in public places. This goes from anywhere to the law and religion discussions as to what monuments with a religious connotation are permitted, and what religious symbols one can wear in their daily lives. As the religious discussions continue to unravel, it is all in an effort to strengthen the relationship between laws and religion. In conclusion, for Lord Denning, the most influential and renowned judge of modern times, the relationship between ?religion?, ?morality? and ?law? was clear. He once commented that, ?Without religion, no morality; without morality, no law. ?Religion? and ?morality? were entwined as were ?morality? and ?law?. Morality and law are not the same although of course they overlap. Law might be thought of as a public codification of morality for a culture, although certain laws in that system, or even the system itself, might be deemed immoral, example, Apartheid. Law is not a necessary attribute of morality although morality may be thought to be a necessary attribute of law. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Criminal Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Starts off well, particularly the second paragraph. But then quickly loses pace.

Other issues that might have been addressed include: the principles of Natural Law Theory, Positivism (an example is provided in this essay - do not kill) and Legal Realism; euthanasia-type issues; the cases of Brown, Wilson and Donovan etc.

Overall, this essay suffers from a lack of structure and argument.

Marked by teacher Edward Smith 05/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Criminal Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    English law does not normally impose liability for an omission or failure to act ...

    4 star(s)

    This showed that murder can be committed by omission. Another example of this R v Harris and Harris 1993 the parents of a girl refused to allow doctors to treat her diabetes with insulin. This is because parents have a duty to take proper care of their children, and if

  2. Marked by a teacher

    How effective was the defence of intoxication?

    3 star(s)

    Intoxication due to prescribed medication results in if D knew that the medicine was likely to make him 'aggressive, unpredictable or uncontrolled' then it would be open for the jury to decide. This comes from the case Bailey (1983) which D was a diabetic who wounded (s20)

  1. Human Trafficking In Australia. This essay will be covering different aspect of human ...

    The United Nations International Labour Organisation (ILO) played a major role in the development in ruling out slavery with new laws. Their main aim was to enforce the idea that countries should be free to rule themselves- means that adherence to international law is largely voluntary and its enforcement is challenged.

  2. The law relating to the defence of insanity is out dated and unsatisfactory. Reform ...

    Lord Lane in Burgess also stated that ''too much sugar in the blood can also be resolved and this matter should go before Parliament'', indicating that there are other ways to better treat diabetics. In situations such as where diabetes is concerned, the law can appear irrational and unfair.

  1. role of judges in civil cases

    If a jury is involved, then the judge sums up the case and waits for the jury's verdict; from this he will pass sentence. If the judge decides that the claimant is entitled to damages, he will have to decide the amount.

  2. Explain what is meant by the term 'causation' in criminal law and assess how ...

    This tests whether the victim?s conduct was reasonable or unreasonable. This is another example of how the courts factor in common sense when determining criminal liability. Two example cases of this are Roberts and Williams & Davis. In Roberts, the victim jumped from a car to escape the defendant?s sexual advances.

  1. Entry to anothers land without permission is never justifiable and is always actionable per ...

    on that land, there is no trespass, so long as the boundaries of that permission are not exceeded. A licence which is given without valuable consideration can be revoked at any time. Where a licence is given by contract, it can also be revoked at any time, although this may result in liability for breach of contract.

  2. Nina runs a burger bar. She puts up a sign in the window saying ...

    that the defendant intended to make a gain for themselves or another or to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss. The gains must be through monetary or property terms by the representation, clearly Nina intended to gain from the representation of the 'best

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work