• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4
5. 5
5
6. 6
6
7. 7
7

# Analysing; The Reaction of Hydrogen Peroxide and Iodide ions

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Skill 3: Analysing; The Reaction of Hydrogen Peroxide and Iodide ions

Table of Results

 Experiment Volume of KI used (dm3) Volume of water used (dm3) Concentration of I- ions Time taken for colour to appear (S) A 5.0 x 10-3 0.020 0.02 9:56 B 0.010 0.015 0.04 5:36 C 0.015 0.010 0.06 4:07 D 0.020 5.0 x 10-3 0.08 3:27 E 0.025 0.000 0.1 2:40

We calculate the concentration of I- ions by following these stages (taking the hypothetical value of experiment A)

Number of moles of KI contained         = volume x concentration

= 5.0 x 10-3 x 0.1

= 5.0 x 10-4 moles

= Number of I- ions contained in the solution

Concentration of solution                = number of mols

Volume of solvent

= 5.0 x 10-4 / (25/1000)

= 0.02 mol/dm3

Thus I have calculated the other values, which appear on the table

Analysis

Derived from the rate equation

Log (1/time) = n log (volume of KI) + constant

We can calculate the rate

Middle

-2.53

C

-1.82

247

-2.39

D

-1.70

207

-2.31

E

-1.60

160

-2.20

Thus, we could derive the gradient of the graph, by drawing it, as seen upon the nest page.

We could also use the statistical method of finding the equation of the regression line, which is:

Y = a +bx (where y and x are the axis's)

B =         (xI - x)(yI -y)

(xI - x)2

a = y - Bx

Where  y = average of all y values

x = average of all x values

xI = x value

yI = y value

Therefore, when an equation is formed, we can mathematically derive the gradient, as the gradient of the graph, mathematically is the constant in front of x, providing y has no constants.

Thus B =         (xI - x)(yI -y)

(xI - x)2

= 0.796

= 0.80

therefore, the order of reaction, with respect to the iodide ions is 0.80.

Maximum error of reading an apparatus        = maximum error x 100

Maximum error of 5 cm3 pipette        = 0.1/ 5 x 100

= 2%

Maximum error of 10 cm3 pipette        = 0.1/ 10 x 100

= 1%

Maximum error of burette         = 0.15/25 x 100

= 6.0 x 10-3 %

Maximum error of measuring cylinder        = 0.5/25 x 100

= 2%

Conclusion

There could have also been substances that were left in the beaker or pipette, thus the actual experiment that was performed did not include these leftovers.  A way of avoiding this is to ensure that they would be "washed" and when transferring solution from a pipette, to ensure all the solution has come out, it would also be suggested to touch the surface of the solution with the pipette.

One way in which should not have affected the reaction, but probably did, is our concentration span, while waiting for the solution to turn colour, we became increasingly distracted by the surroundings, and hence, at times may have missed the actual time of which the solution changed colour, thus could have affected the results, even though in a very minor way.

Other ways of improving this experiment would include the use of a pipette instead of a measuring cylinder; even a burette would increase accuracy of the reaction, as a measuring cylinder is quite inaccurate.  Another way of improving the reaction is by using a higher concentration of the solutions.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics essays

5 star(s)

The actual proof for axn is as follows - axn + hanxn-1 + a n(n-1) (xn-2)h� + ... + ahn - xn 2 h I will try to prove this - xn + (nhxn-1) + n(n-1) (xn-2)h� + ... + hn - xn 2 h Therefore the equation to work

2. ## Estimate a consumption function for the UK economy explaining the economic theory and statistical ...

3 star(s)

T- value of this equation are 7.86 and 125. By contrast with the fist equation, these two are larger. For doing a good job, another test will be used to estimate the equation as well. That is F-test. It is often used to examine the same thing as R^2.

1. ## Exponential decay:The objective of this experiment is to get the trend line of heart ...

140 130 140 150 140 140 Candy 96 102 100 160 130 120 100 100 100 100 Colin 96 96 70 180 140 150 140 130 130 120 Ivin 90 84 100 120 150 140 110 110 110 110 Jackie 90 72 70 160 140

method: Tan ? method The Tan ? method is very similar to the Triangle method. It is not as accurate as the Increment method, but can be used to give an estimate of the gradients. First of all, you will need to draw a tangent on the curve.

1. ## Experimentally calculating the wavelength of an He-Ne laser by means of diffraction gratings

= x/L, but since the angle would be so minute, one can use the equation: ? = x/L. Since the angle would be so minute, sin? would also be approximately ?. Therefore: ? = (dsin?)/m ? = (dx)/(mL). Hypothesis: If one shines a He-Ne laser through different diffraction gratings and

2. ## Examining, analysing and comparing three different ways in which to find the roots to ...

4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 5 -7.00 -3.58 0.09 4.01 8.18 12.63 17.34 22.32 27.59 33.15 39.00 As the graph and the table show, there is a change of sign between 4.1 and 4.2, and thus the new interval was [4.1, 4.2].

1. ## Three ways of reading The Bloody Chamber.

At the first level, the key being inserted into the lock is a signifier, whose signified is the idea that secrets are being uncovered. The sign at this first level semiological account is the 'secrets uncovered' key. At the second mythic level of semiological analysis, the sign from the first level, the 'secrets uncovered' key now functions as the SIGNIFIER.

2. ## Although everyone who gambles at all probably tries to make a quick mental marginal ...

It is obvious that the payoff and the odds have an inverse relationship: Fig. 1: The function to relate payoff and odds will be found through linear regression. The line appears to be quadratic in nature, thus I hypothesize that the equation will be in the form:.

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to