From Russia With Love.

Authors Avatar

        

From Russia With Love

From Russia With Love, is a James Bond film created in 1963. It pits James Bond, the British secret agent at his best against the Russian organization SPECTRE.

From Russia With Love is the second film in the long running Bond series of films. This film is the successor to Dr No, and many critics argue that these two are among the best of the Bond films, with memorable scenes, solid storyline, memorable villains and acting (Sean Connery as James Bond especially).

James Bond was the creation of Ian Fleming, who began writing his first story ‘Casino Royale’ while on his Jamaican hideaway. After almost a decade, his stories were turned into a movie, Dr. No in 1962 which was directed by Albert Broccoli and Harry Saltzman, although Ian Fleming still had an influence on the movies.

Ian Fleming described Bond as “an interesting man to whom extraordinary things happen”. This is why he chose the name James Bond, as it seems anonymous, even though James Bond is far from anonymous symbolizing a very upper class person with a good taste in cars, cigarettes and wines.

Join now!

The movie, From Russia with Love, was created in 1963, in the middle of the car war. Thus, it was very much influenced by the historical happenings at the time.

At the time, tensions were quite high with the allies and the communists, particularly between the USA and the USSR.

At the time, the USSR was viewed on by the western world as communist, and communist was seen as evil. Therefore the USSR was seen as evil by most of the western world. This is shown in the movie quite deliberately, as the Russians are depicted as the bad ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

Avatar

Though somewhat lacking in detail, there is some very astute analysis in this essay. Without realising it, the student has neatly encapsulated a lot of current critical theory about the representation of conflict in cultural production, and I think many contemporary theorists would agree with their summation of the film. 3 stars.