• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Thomas Jefferson

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Warren Winter 2/23/04 US History I Honors "In his inaugural speech, Jefferson stated: 'We are all Republicans, we are all Federalists' - yet the greatest irony of the Virginia Dynasty was that by 1820, the Republicans were Federalists and the Federalists were gone, thus proving the political dictum: 'power promotes pragmatism.'" Etymologically derived from the Greek prassein ("to do, act, perform"), pragmatism is defined as "the doctrine that practical consequences are the criteria of knowledge and meaning and value." Inextricable from the dynamic nature of politics is the pragmatic tendency for those in power to orchestrate practical consequences to benefit themselves and their parties. As is evident in the history of the Virginia Dynasty, the most effective way to assuage the political rift between parties is for the dominant party to appeal to an opposing constituency and to its rival party by embracing their ideology. This fluid adaptation of value, as in ideology, to practical outcomes establishes the dictum that "power promotes pragmatism." Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and James Monroe constitute the Virginia Dynasty, the Republican line of Virginian presidents who came to dominate American politics for the first two decades of the 19th century. Deemed a "consummate politician" for his ability to espouse his enemies' persuasions, Jefferson set the precedent for the proceeding Republican presidents to integrate Federalist ideology into their executive policies. ...read more.

Middle

In a 1792 letter to George Washington, Jefferson ventured that Hamilton's financial system "flowed from principles adverse to liberty, and was calculated to undermine and demolish the Republic." Jefferson's practical aims as a president, nevertheless, consistently derailed his own emotionally charged anti-Federalist invective, for the aforementioned accomplishments of his first term proved his only appreciable changes to the Hamiltonian system. "He believed in those [liberating] ideas... but he was not in the habit of breaking lances trying to fulfill them" (Hofstadter 33). Undermining his reputation for advancing local banks, a loose financial system, and individual states' payment of Revolutionary War debt, Jefferson chose to avoid intervening in the Federalist programs for funding national debt at par and federally assuming the state debts. As local banks chartered by Republican state legislatures aligned their financial support with Republican Party, "soon the Republican machines began flirting with the financial interests they had sworn to oppose" (Hofstadter 47). In defense of this burgeoning fiscal elite of Republicans, Jefferson declared to Secretary of the Treasury Albert Gallatin: "A merchant is naturally a Republican, and can be otherwise only from a vitiated state of things" (Hofstadter 47). Jefferson, furthermore, did not temper public land speculation or take steps in reforming the limitations on suffrage. ...read more.

Conclusion

In 1816, James Monroe took office with 183 electoral votes, the Federalist Rufus King losing with a scant thirty-four votes. In 1820, Monroe was reelected with 231 votes over John Quincy Adams - who entirely dropped the political appellative Federalist and ran as an Independent Republican -- holding merely one vote. Richard Hofstadter asserts, "When [Jefferson] entered the White House it was after satisfying the Federalists that he and they had come to some kind of understanding" (44). After winning the support of moderate Federalists by means of his pliant ideology, however, Jefferson had not merely brought about an understanding; he had set the precedent for their political eradication. Jefferson became a loose constructionist in order to rationalize the Louisiana Purchase and his unapproved military measures in the First Barbary War, and Madison had completely echoed the structure of Hamilton's financial system in his creation of the Second Bank of the United States. With their political identity thereby obviated, the Federalists were forced into assuming the stances of strict constructionism, as in their reaction to the Louisiana Purchase, and the compact theory of government, as in the Hartford Convention. As Josiah Quincy declared, the Republicans had "out-Federalized Federalism" (Hofstadter 54). The Virginia Dynasty's defeat of the Federalists not only proves that "power promotes pragmatism"; it reciprocally proves that pragmatism promotes power. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    succeed in doing so-no matter what the feedback about the policies and their efficacy may turn out to be (Smith and Deering 1984: 263-70). Double-loop learning in the public sphere is impeded also by the formal separation of policy-making and policy implementation, as for example between legislative and administrative bodies.

  2. Liberalism Notes

    Paine a liberal? (uncompromising individualism, sympathies with manfacturers, hostility to government). Or a socialist? (Blueprint for the Welfare State, support for graduated income tax, inspiration for Chartists). More impact in USA/France than in Britain - seen as dangerous due to uncompromising republicanism, total opposition to hereditary principle, rejection of Christianity.

  1. Breaking down the Walls: A Discourse of Ideology and "Otherness"

    However, they presented little evidence by or from the women themselves to endorse these claims. Clearly then, it can be seen that the construction of the third world woman is problematic in that it is used as a tool to create inferiority/superiority instead of being a means of help.

  2. Why was the Dreyfus Affair so bitterly divisive in France? The Dreyfus Affair began ...

    What the Dreyfus Affair did, Johnson says, is give the right a new sense of direction and coherence, it gave them something to rally around. The actions of the Dreyfusards and the issues which they raised polarised the objectives of the right and gave them a new ideology based in Nationalism4.

  1. M-theory is a solution proposed for the unknown theory of everything

    Historically, there have been two reactions to the apparent inconsistency of quantum theories with the necessary background-independence of general relativity. The first is that the geometric interpretation of general relativity is not fundamental, but emergent. The other view is that background-independence is fundamental, and quantum mechanics needs to be generalized to settings where there is no a priori specified time.

  2. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    Having functioned as an opposition force, political parties were simply not prepared to offer an action program once the system they opposed had disappeared. The democratic camp in particular lacked cohesion, being defined largely by their opposition to the former Soviet system.

  1. Notes on John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

    allowed to compel people to testify in court - since both of these are essential to social well-being. c) Intervention in emergencies where the agent is ignorant: The third exception is that an individual may forcibly intervene and prevent some action if it is evident that the agent does not

  2. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    How can Locke's universally known theory be applied to each person? The answer to this question is that Locke's theory of property can not incorporate each person into it's meaning. The information that Locke wrote applied to the sixteenth century.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work