• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

I might believe that an action is morally right, but this does not give me a motive to perform it. Discuss. (30)

Extracts from this document...


'I might believe that an action is morally right, but this does not give me a motive to perform it.' Discuss. (30) Psychological egoism claims that human nature is such that we cannot help but pursue our self-interest, we are biologically and psychologically disposed to behave in this way. It is a fact that we automatically act to promote our own interest and we cannot do otherwise. This theory highlights a strength of egoism as a whole, and it also explains ethical motivation. I act morally because it benefits me, and furthers my own life. It places human actions firmly and consistently within the natural world: like all plants and creatures, we seek or own good. This is a convincing answer to the question - 'why be moral?', and this theory also agreements with the statement expressed in the question. Psychological egoism claims that even if something is morally right, we have no motive to perform it unless it benefits us and furthers our own life. However, it could be argued that being moral simply requires us to conform with moral rules or be a 'virtuous character' - and there is nothing to specifically say that following moral rules or being virtuous will not be of benefit for us. An example could be used is the moral rule that it is wrong for us to steal - a psychological egoist may ...read more.


They believe this because virtue ethics claims that our main aim in life is to be truly happy, but we will only be able to do this if we are completely balanced. Our true happiness comes with the conviction that by being moral we will achieve a flouring and fulfilling life, as well as the knowledge that we are contributing to a flourishing community. They believe we are happier around positive and supportive people but an egoist would not be able to do this. For Aristotle, there is an aim (or telos in Greek) for everything that we do. Like by me writing this essay, my telos is that you will gain a clear understanding of whether something being moral gives you a motive to perform it. According to Aristotle, we have two types of aims: superior aims and subordinate aims. An illustration that could be used is that attending my lessons at college (which is my subordinate aim) will get me good A-level results and those results will help me to get into the university of my choice which will help me to be happy, and for Aristotle everyone's final, superior aim is happiness. However the word we should use for happiness in Aristotle's theory is eudaimonia, which could be described as 'living well' or 'flourishing', not just for yourself but for society. ...read more.


Egoism provides a better theory as to explaining why we are motivated to do things. Although virtue ethics provides a better explanation as to why the soldier may give up his life for others, it seems more plausible that we do things to benefit ourselves as opposed to others in most other situations. It cannot be denied that at that specific moment, the soldier was put in to a position where he could not think properly about the situation and the implications it may have - although technically he could have been being 'virtuous' or 'altruistic', in another way you could say he was not being altruistic at all as his family and friends back home would be affected negatively by the decision he made. It appears that a large majority of people would not act morally just because it is the right thing to do, when put in the situation that the soldier was put in it is most likely that a majority of people who still had something to live for (e.g. family, wealth etc.) would allow somebody else to give up their life rather than them giving up theirs. As stated earlier, egoism provides a better theory as to explaining why we are motivated to do things) - it is human nature that we will do things to benefit ourselves and allow ourselves to carry on living. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. 'It pays to be moral.' Discuss. (30)

    Ethical egoism is the doctrine that all persons should act from their own self-interest, which suggests a life of extreme selfishness but this is not so - it does not necessarily mean a life of short-term pleasure although it might.

  2. What are the principles of natural law? Every adult has the right to become ...

    However, for an act to be truly moral it is not sufficient to do a right action, the motive must be moral as well. For example, helping an old lady across the road is the right thing to do, but if the motive is for personal gain then it is wrong.

  1. Outline the main features of virtue ethic

    He outlines that to which he identifies the central question of morality as having to do with the habits and knowledge concerning how to live a good life. His approach seeks to demonstrate that good judgment coming from a good character.

  2. Sartre is a very strong proponent of strong determinism, that is, he does not ...

    Skeptical arguments rest on the fact that there is an objective world around us and the only way we know of it is through our perceptions. Their beliefs require a methodology based on an assumption of doubt with the aim of acquiring approximate or relative certainty.

  1. Leaving home - a corrected essay.

    the beginning of this argument, it'll help the reader understand ur argument better) An important point to note is that those who leave home do not necessarily disobey the state, but rather the state has disobeyed them. As one's right to feel safe is taken away, the insecurity drives the citizen away from his or her own land.

  2. How might we combat the Gettier Problem? In giving your answer set forth two ...

    John is now at work and looks at his key. He believes that it will open the door to his home, he is justified in believing this because of past evidence ... he has used this key many a time to open that door and so he believes it will

  1. Which of Kant's formulations of the categorical imperative offers the most plausible account of ...

    If the latter, then he cannot rationally will that world and also will that his own ends be promoted by his making the lying promise. Therefore, it is wrong for him to make a lying promise to advantage himself. How far can this argument be taken?

  2. Is active citizenship necessary to the achievement of eudaimonia?

    of happiness for its citizens, then this goal must also be natural, for it is an end in itself. In Book VII, Aristotle states that 'the Gods are happy and blessed, not by reason of any external good, but in themselves and by reason of their own nature'1.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work