• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What moral issues are raised by the genetic modification, plants and micro-organisms

Extracts from this document...


"Human cloning and experiments on animals both illustrate that humans have no respect for the sanctity of life". Discuss. Genetic modification is a highly contentious issue, not least because many people think that humans are trying to play God. Humans are a superior species in that they have evolved to echelons of capability which are far beyond the ability stratums of the rest of the animal kingdom. Humans are created by God in Genesis to be stewards over the entire world, so most people think that this encompasses treating animals, plants and micro-organisms with respect as they are part of the creation. Furthermore, the Roman Catholic pursuit of natural law also condemns genetic modification, as it obviously contravenes what God intended, as the purpose of organisms is reproduction either sexually or asexually (which is the nearest thing to cloning in the animal kingdom), and at no stage is human interference intended in their Aristotelian final cause. Furthermore, psalm 139 explicitly describes how God is the necessary creator in the womb: "For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother's womb." However, Situationism - that is the Christian consequential system based on agapaic love - would permit genetic modification, depending on the circumstances, as genetic modification may be seen as an act of humility and love (e.g. ...read more.


Genetically modified crops can minimize food insecurity, which will in turn minimize or lessen the related social problems. Therefore, genetically modified organisms should be developed and promoted. One problem with such foods is although they may have been introduced to cure world hunger, they are often infertile, so that the farmers in the poor countries have to buy more crops each year, again a result of an uncaring Western seed-producer. This ties in with SOL, as food is being created to save lives, which is the ultimate respect for human life being sacred. Nevertheless, if the natural world is not ours to modify and to modify organisms is to exert unprecedented power, then such acts reveal an objectionable level of arrogance, which is non-virtuous. Engaging in a non-virtuous action is ill advised and wrong and genetic modification is therefore ill advised and wrong too. Natural Law is essentially sceptical about the benefits of genetic modification. Nevertheless, genetic modification is a progression of what we have been doing for years. For example, in Genesis, there is the story of Jacob who selectively breeds. Indeed pedigree animals and even domesticated animals, and cross breeds are genetically modified versions of what is ultimately natural. ...read more.


This disrespects the SOL, as it may lead to hundreds of people starving, if, say, super-locusts wiping out crops in poorer countries. To conclude though, it may just be that society as a whole has time to contemplate which uses of the technology might be acceptable and which would not. Views will inevitably change over time: the first test tube baby, Louise Brown, was born in 1978, beforehand it was seen as appalling and in vitro fertilisation is now commonplace too. Attitudes will also vary between countries: many fear that cloning would be exploited by megalomaniacs but in my view, it is far more likely that the ethical boundaries will be tested by the in vitro fertilisation clinics in the USA. Overall, though, I think that in certain circumstances, genetic modification can and does respect the SOL. Indeed, therapeutic cloning to create stem cells would mean that lives could be saved, and grave terminal illnesses could be greatly reduced, because of life being seen as sacred. However, it is in the application of genetic modification that it may not respect the SOL, especially if it occurs without agape, but instead for financial gain, as SOL immediately becomes a facade for a doctor/scientist to perform such an act whilst claiming to be morally good and morally right. 1 Will Forbes ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Genetics, Evolution & Biodiversity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Genetics, Evolution & Biodiversity essays

  1. Marked by a teacher


    4 star(s)

    harm the interest of people with mental illness is the short sighted and unimaginative view. The power of television to reach a large audience so swiftly challenges anyone seeking to alter public opinion about mental health. (http://pb.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/full/24/8/281) Changing times for anorexia - the female 'image ideal' through media Up until

  2. Peer reviewed

    The cloning of Dolly.

    4 star(s)

    In many other countries and states such as California, cloning has also been banned but not as harshly, as some exceptions were allowed. But furthermore George W. Bush is still consulting his decision. Case Studies Cloning Dolly the sheep In 1997 cloning became a household term, thanks to Ian Wilmut

  1. Free essay

    Outline the impact on the evolution of plants and animals of: ...

    * He performed a large number of Crosses; i.e. he repeated many times. * He made exact counts of the characteristics, kept careful records and counted the results he obtained. * He studied one character at a time. * He chose a plant (the garden pea plant)

  2. List areas of science that have raised ethical or moral issues

    An example of this process is the dolly the sheep; Dolly was created using somatic nuclear cell transfer. Scientific researchers transferred the genetic material from the nucleus of a donor adult to an egg with no nucleus (genetic material removed).

  1. Gm foods and Gene therapy

    meanings of 'normal' that would reject persons who are, for instance, of just standard intelligence. Furthermore, fairly or not, a number of individuals connect all genetic manoeuvring with history abuses of the idea of 'eugenics,' or the understanding of techniques of enhancing genetic qualities through selective breeding.

  2. Cloning - The assualt on the sanctity of life

    For example recently an American couple has approached an American University is a bid to clone their eleven year old dog, they are spending over two million dollars to clone her. The various types of cloning There are three different types of cloning, embryo cloning, reproductive cloning and therapeutic cloning.

  1. Genetic modification.

    Therefore, by modifying the action of enzymes, genetic engineers can potentially modify any biochemical reaction in an organism to produce a desired change in a characteristic. Genetic transformation, to produce transgenic plants, goes to the stable integration of a foreign gene into the gnome of a plant regenerated from cells or cells stripped of their cell walls by enzymes.

  2. Genetic Modification, should we be scared?

    The breakthrough was then quickly patented by a large pharmaceutical company and Boyer was made a partner. Gene therapy seems the most obvious banner of genetic engineering?s advances so far; the first instance of it being in the early 1990s when an experimental technique cured two young girls of a rare and often fatal blood disease.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work