• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically compare the three main theories of deviance and assess their strengths & weaknesses

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Critically compare the three main theories of deviance and assess their strengths & weaknesses A functionalist analysis of deviance looks for the source of deviance in the nature of society rather than in the biological or psychological nature of the individual. Although functionalists agree that social control mechanisms such as the police and the courts are necessary to keep deviance in check, many argue that a certain amount of deviance can contribute to the well-being of society. Durkhiem (1895) believed that: * Crime is an 'integral part of all healthy societies'. This is because individuals are exposed to different influences and will not be committed to the shared values and beliefs of society. * Crime can be functional. All societies need to progress and all social change begins with some form of deviance. In order for change to occur, yesterday's deviance must become tomorrow's normality. Nelson Mandela, once imprisoned as a 'terrorist', eventually became president of South Africa. * Societies need both crime and punishment. Without punishment the crime rate would reach a point where it became dysfunctional. Durkheim's views have been developed by A. ...read more.

Middle

5. Now a deviant subculture may develop which includes norms and values which support their deviant behaviour. Becker's approach is used by Jock Young (1971) in his study of 'hippie' marijuana users in London. 1. The police see hippies as dirty, lazy drug addicts. 2. Police action against marijuana users unites them and makes them feel different. 3. As a result they retreat into small groups. 4. Deviant norms and values develop in these closed groups. Hair is grown longer, clothes become more unconventional and drug use becomes a central activity. Thus a self-fulfilling prophecy is created. Lemert (1972) distinguishes between 'primary' and 'secondary' deviance. Primary deviance consists of deviant acts before they are publicly labelled. Trying to find the causes of primary deviance is not very helpful because: * Samples of deviants are inevitably based only on those who have been labelled, and they are therefore unrepresentative. * Most deviant acts are so common that they may be, in statistical terms, normal. Most males may at some time commit a homosexual act, engage in delinquency and so on. The important factor in creating 'deviance' is the reaction of society - the public identification of the deviant. ...read more.

Conclusion

Feminists have argued that Marxist theories ignore the importance of patriarchy in influencing the criminal justice system. Marxists have also been accused of neglecting the importance of racism in the enforcement of law. 2. Crime has not been eradicated in communist societies based on Marxist principles. 3. Stephen Jones (1998) points out that capitalism does not always produce high crime rates. For example, in Switzerland the crime rate is very low. 4. Perhaps the distribution of power is not as simple as some Marxists suggest. Jones gives the example of insider trading (taking advantage of 'insider' knowledge to make huge profits on the stock exchange). This is illegal, which suggests that capitalists do not always get the laws they want. 5. 'Left Realists' believe that Marxists put too much emphasis on corporate crime. Other crimes such as burglary cause greater harm than Marxists imply. Their victims are usually working-class and the consequences can be devastating for them. 6. Post-modern Criminology rejects Marxist criminology as being neither believable nor defensible. Despite these criticisms, Marxism has been an influence on a number of critical perspectives on deviance. Some have drawn their inspiration from Marxism and can be referred to as neo-Marxist approaches. Others owe less to Marxism and are better defined as radical approaches. Chirag Patel - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    It links the study of deviance to social inequality. Based on the work of Karl Marx, conflict theory sees a dominant class as controlling the resources of society and using its power to create the institutional rules and belief systems that support its power.

  2. Access the strengths and limitations of Subcultural Theories in explaining deviance.

    and eventually drift out of it and reach full independent adult status. A downside to classic theories, such as Merton's, Cohen's and Cloward and Ohlin's, is that they can not always be used to understand modern patterns of crime and deviance.

  1. Evaluate Functionalist Theories of Crime and Deviance

    differs from other sub-cultural theorists by arguing that 'delinquent' sub-cultures are an independent cultural phenomenon which is an extension of a separate "lower" culture. He identifies six "focal concerns" of 'delinquent' sub-cultures-all of which, when combined, result in what the middle and upper cultures would term as 'delinquent' behaviour.

  2. The Strengths and Limitations of Left Realism and Right Realism Theories in Explaining Crime ...

    Young argues that certain areas of crime (e.g. juvenile status crimes such as underage drinking) are over-policed, whereas others (e.g. racial assault) are under-policed. The police need to 'get their priorities right' and address these under-policed areas. Jock Young sees the problem of crime rooted in social inequalities and does not believe that crime can be dealt with by simple improving the efficiency of the police.

  1. Assess Marxist theories of crime and deviance.

    Therefore, official statistics are invalid. Marxists describe capitalists as the real criminals even though official statistics make crime out to be a working class phenomenon. Sutherland created the concept of white-collar crime as 'crime committed by persons of a higher social status'.

  2. Assess Interactionist theories of crime and deviance.

    Male heterosexual prostitutes would be paid to engage in sex with male clients and were labelled by clients as homosexual but their self-concept was not affected. Akers developed the labelling theory by suggesting that sometimes labelling leads to a change in behaviour but sometimes the behaviour comes before the label.

  1. Drawing on examples from your reading, explore the medias impact on the fear of ...

    (scraton page 75). As a result of this the Liverpudlian community have been ascribed a label of 'rowdyness' and 'hooliganism' which has meant that people outside of Liverpool have developed a fear of its unpredictability and due to this the possibility of crime.

  2. Assess the view that crime and deviance is the result of labelling, the media ...

    This leads to the conclusion that someone who commits a crime but is not labelled has not deviated, and they are not aware they are deviant until they are labelled, yet we are still aware they are going against the social norms.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work