By Comparing Silas Marner and Godfrey Cass, consider Eliot's presentation of fatherhood in Silas Marner

Authors Avatar

By Comparing Silas Marner and Godfrey Cass, consider George Eliot’s presentation of fatherhood in Silas Marner.

There are many similarities between Silas Marner and George Eliot’s own life. Both she and Marner discovered happiness again when they were middle aged; Marner was given Eppie and found love and trust once more through her. Just like Eliot found love with Lewes. Silas Marner was written in the Victorian era – a time where class was a very big factor in life – “lower” classes were not supposed to stand up to the “upper” classes. However at the end of the book Marner stands up to Godfrey Cass and speaks his mind. Eliot in relation to fatherhood believed in “the remedial influence of pure, natural human relations”, Godfrey Cass is the absolute contrast to this idea unlike Marner who loves Eppie with all his heart even though she is not his own child. Also like Marner Eliot was not accepted into the community as she lived with a married man but once she moved out of his home and got married she was accepted again, Marner made his way back into the community by Eppie. Moreover Charles Darwin’s discoveries of the evolution of man affected the way Eliot wrote the book as Darwin was one of the first people who questioned God; this is reflected in the book when Marner turned his back on God.

George Eliot uses Silas Marner and Godfrey Cass as symbols to air current views at that time. By using Marner and Godfrey Cass she can openly express her views of fatherhood as a reflection of duty, by writing this book it is one of the only ways she can express herself, as she was a women. Being a woman in the late 1800s and early 1900s meant that you were thought of as being lesser and only needed for producing and raising an heir. Eliot uses two different spectrums of fatherhood; there is Silas Marner who is the adoptive father of Eppie however he loves her more than anything in his life “my precious child.” He brings her up as a “model child”. In contrast there is Godfrey Cass, who is the paternal father of Eppie, but he passes at the chance to look after her and to be a proper father when Molly Farren dies. He does this because he is afraid that Nancy Lammeter would not marry him also he feels that a child would be a burden to his lifestyle. He is an example of a father who only wants the child when it suits himself: thus making the reader question whether he is fit enough to be a father and even the morality of his character.

Eliot firsts presents Silas Marner as being a person that likes routine, “his daily routine present hardly any change” he wants everything to be the same. He does this because of the wrong doing that was done against him before he came to “Raveloe” he was tricked and betrayed, therefore if he now he keeps everything the same no one can come in and trick him again. Eliot also wanted our first impressions of Silas Marner being a sort of recluse, he didn't mix with the community “he sought no man or women” moreover did not have a “normal” job. It that time in the rural villages most people were farmers- so a weaver was something out of the ordinary. Marner doesn't like to open his door to anyone “he invited no comer to step across his door-sill”. This is because his most trusted and cherished friend, William Dane, who was “faultless”, betrayed him, before this Marner would have done anything for him. We learn a little bit later of his love of the money that he has earned over the years. The money has taken over his life, “work sixteen hours a day” I do not think it is greed but is something stable that he thought could not be taken away from him he also views it as his only friend, “he drew them out to enjoy their companionship”. At this point it seems to the reader that Silas Marner would prefer the company of his money then friends. However we do have to remember how he was deceived and how everything he knew was taken from him.

Join now!

George Eliot makes us sympathise with Silas Marner as not only did he get his fiancée finished their engagement and married best friend but also he was rejected out of the church by “drawing lots”. He did not do anything to deserve any of this. George Eliot decides to tell the reader about this before she tells us about Marner and his money. This is because we can see how Marner was prior to him having his life destroyed and before he became he curled into himself. Therefore the reader can understand why Marner is like he is in ...

This is a preview of the whole essay