Examine the impact of the international oil-price rise of 1973 on the economies of Western Europe

Authors Avatar

Christopher Marshall EH 1602 Tutor: Dr. Smith

Towards A New Europe 1939-1992

Examine the impact of the international oil-price rise of 1973 on the economies of Western Europe

The international oil-price rise of 1973 had a significant impact on the economies of Western Europe because it was the catalyst that aggravated existing and accumulating problems already present in the economic structure. There had been a decline in world economic growth in the late 1960s, and though there was rapid economic recovery in Western Europe by 1973, the economy was still unstable and had inherited problems.  I believe this caused the decline of economic growth. The Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) had increased the initial price of oil by four times by 1974. Europe’s largest economies were severely hit, and in 1975 recession was widespread for the first time in post-war Europe. Though exports and productivity continued to grow, measures taken to combat the crisis could not manage the interplay of problems related to the economic sector. These problems included stagnation output; stagflation, which described the combination of high levels of inflation and unemployment; and balance of payments deficits. Also, there was a radical change in the management of western economies: the Keynesian demand strategy could not survive the magnitude of the oil crisis and was consequently abandoned in favour of Monetarism. This essay will argue that it was an unstable European economy with growing problems and the incapability to solve them that caused the decline in economic growth and that the oil-price rise of 1973 was the catalyst.

                

There is a wide amount of commentary on the oil-price rise, and historians and economists differ on its impact or exact role during Europe’s experience of recession between 1973 and 1979. It is important, therefore, to understand the function and position of oil before examining its impact on Western European economies. The western world and Japan from the 1950s increasingly became big importers of OPEC oil for sustaining their economic systems. Oil is very useful: it can replace gas, coal and nuclear energy in all their uses; and there is no better substitute for oil as fuel for cars or aeroplanes. Robert Mabro states that oil has a lower average cost in production than other resources, and it is this cost advantage which encourages investment.1 In addition, in 1972 oil overtook coal as the dominant energy resource used in Western Europe. In such a prominent position, the impact of a sudden price rise in oil on Western European economies would have been a terrifying. However, in 1977 the consumption of oil in Europe in most cases had fallen on average by five per cent from the 1972 levels.2 This shows that the oil crisis itself did not affect to any large degree the oil imports into the western world. Though arguably oil was the source that pinned inflation at a high level throughout the 1970s, Mabro claims that because Western Europe depended on oil from OPEC they were prepared to pay much more than the competitive price.3 The oil crisis demonstrated a degree of control for OPEC over the European economies. Though this is not entirely true, for Christopher Allsopp the oil crisis represents ‘a permanent change in the terms of trade towards OPEC.’4

Join now!

From observing statistics before and after the oil crisis, it does appear conclusive that there was a major impact on Europe’s economy. For example, the annual growth rate of the real domestic product (GDP) in the period 1969-1973 for the United Kingdom was 2.8 per cent; in France, 6.1 per cent; in West Germany, 4.5 per cent; and in Italy, 4.1 per cent. However, the annual growth rates of the GDP in the period 1973-1980, after the oil-price rise struck the world economy, shows considerable decline: in the UK, 1.9 per cent; in France, 3.6 per cent; in West ...

This is a preview of the whole essay