Gap Analysis: Harrison-Keyes    

Running head:  GAP ANALYSIS: HARRISON-KEYES

Gap Analysis: Harrison-Keyes

Carletta Anderson

University of Phoenix


Gap Analysis: Harrison-Keyes

This paper will address the issues that Harrison-Keyes (HK) is facing in regards to updating its strategy for entering the e-book publishing world while focusing on different aspects of the implementation strategy. HK is global publisher of print products and they have been in business since 1899. Throughout the years, to meet the demands of the publishing market, they have shifted their focus to suit the changing demands. This paper will not only address the issues but also the opportunities that the company can gain from developing strategies in addressing the issues.

Situation Analysis

Issue and Opportunity Identification

        The hardware system is unable to support the new requirements to match the demand of the e-books project. HK now has the opportunity to upgrade their hardware system to enhance the productivity and support the e-books project. Project managers are responsible for integrating assigned resources to complete the project according to plan. At the same time they need to initiate changes in plans and schedules as persistent problems make plans unworkable. In other words, managers want to keep the project going while making necessary adjustments as the project progresses (Gray & Larson, 2006).

        Authors are having issues about piracy and copyrights. Current paper publishing has determined ways to protect an author’s work, and they believe that introduction of e-books may cause unauthorized distribution of their work in the market. The company clearly did not consider all stakeholders perspectives and possible concerns prior to making the decision of implementing e-books into company processes. HK now have the opportunity to underline copyright and piracy laws for e-books practices. The company can create a new contract that will determine liability and lawful distribution of books online only to authorized members. They have the opportunity to address key stakeholder values, interest and beliefs. Most decisions on a project do not require a formal meeting to discuss alternatives and determine solutions. Instead decisions are made in real time as part of the daily interaction patterns between project managers, stakeholders, and team members (Gray & Larson, 2006).

        The company has faced issues with the international company Asia digital. Asia Digital has an outsourcing contract with HK to produce the new e-books format. Pete Ross is having issued identifying with the cultural and geographical differences between HK and Asia Digital causing communications gaps and uncertainty in timeline. The company now has the opportunity to educate their employees about cultural diversity and differences and how to manage other clients, vendors and stakeholders who come from different religious, cultural and geographical backgrounds.

        A second major reason partnering arrangements break down is the failure to adequately address with cultural differences among the contributing organizations. Differences in management styles, terminology, operating procedures, and perspectives of time can result in culture shock that frustrates the development and maintenance of good rapport between the participants. The key is to try to merge these cultural differences into a common team culture that is based on successfully completing the project. This process begins with the team-building sessions but must be a priority agenda item throughout the duration of the project (Gray & Larson, 2006).

Join now!

        HK clearly does not have a monitoring system in place to manage the costs. Additional costs have risen which the company had not accounted for before like the costs associated with upgrading the company software. The company now has the opportunity to develop an integrated information system which will help understand planned and actual costs. The earned value system starts with the time-phased costs that provide the project budget baseline, which is called the planned budgeted value of the work scheduled (PV). Given this time-phased baseline, comparisons can be made with actual and planned schedule and costs using a concept ...

This is a preview of the whole essay