This report examines the competitive strategy that needs to be adopted by Komatsu to continue its impressive performance over the years, along with its internal management policies.

Authors Avatar by g1jot (student)

Group 3 


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This report examines the competitive strategy that needs to be adopted by Komatsu to continue its impressive performance over the years, along with its internal management policies. We have done an industry level analysis, we have used Michael Porter’s Five Forces Model for competitor analysis to analyse the competitive edge of Komatsu over its rival firms. We have also discussed the key management issues of the organization, across the spheres of Functional Departments over the time frame.

We have done a detailed analysis of current strategy being followed by various divisions of Komatsu and came out with few issues which need immediate attention in terms of strategy formulation and suggested few strategies to be adopted to fix those identified issues.

We have concluded the report by providing an overall strategy to be adopted by Komatsu and Recommendations, based on our understanding of the case. All these recommendations are to either address existing issues faced by Komatsu, or to enhance its operations to make it more profitable and have a sustainable growth and also to compete with market leader Caterpillar.

Industry Level Analysis

According to the case the industry is highly concentrated, with the 50 largest companies holding more than 80% of the market. The industry is unstable (currently, as mentioned in the case) because of multiple factors like the 12% downturn in the US construction industry in 1979 , poor forecasts for the next few years ,At the same time there was an uncertain economic environment in LDC’s like low commodity prices, problem associated with debt servicing  and recession . While price rises have been significant over the past few years the net industry position has dipped into negative figures. But even though the US market continues to fall as a proportion of the World construction industry (from 50% to 45%) Asia/Pacific will increase significantly at the same time (26% to 31%). Therefore the companies need to ride out the current US/European recessions, enable customers to cope with increasing cost pressures and importantly, take advantage of the Asian growth to be profitable in the longer term.

Characteristics of the Industry

  • Impacted by Global economic trends
  • Cyclical demand patterns
  • Impacted by fluctuations in price of minerals due to dependency on mining Industry
  • Shifting demand to developing countries

Critical Success Factors in the Industry

  • R&D for product development, product design, operational efficiency and others.
  • Intertwined system of TQC, PDA cycle and management policy
  • Focus on Quality and productivity improvement
  • Projects like EPOCHS
  • Product diversification
  • Twin Orientation of overseas market and Customer Satisfaction

Competitor Analysis(Based on Porter’s Five forces model):

Competition among Industry rivals: High

Komatsu is the second largest player in the world EME industry with a market share of 60% in Japan and 25% worldwide. Caterpillar is the major competitor with a market share of 43%worldwide. It faces competition from other established global players like J.I.Case, John Deere, Clark Equipment and Fiat-Allis. Along with these global players it also faces competition from specialized local players in Europe and North America.Komatsu has focused on lower price and higher quality of its products to maintain the competitive position in the market.

Threat of Substitutes: Low

The threat of substitutes is minimal. There are no other comparable products which could perform the job done by Komatsu’s products. Human labour is the only possible substitute but it requires a lot of time to perform the same function.

Buyer’s Power: Medium

 Presence of a good number of local firms and other global players gives the customers fair amount of choice for purchasing the equipment. To attract the customers, Komatsu has priced its products 30-40% below the similar Cat’s equipments and Komatsu has a broad product line with number of variants.

Join now!

 Supplier’s Power: Low

The suppliers have a little influence on Komatsu as it is a vertically integrated player. Most of its components are produced in-house. Vertical integration has helped Komatsu to price its products at lower prices.

Threat of new entrants: Low 

EME manufacturing business requires huge capital investment, R&D expenditure and a differentiating product feature. This poses huge entry barriers in EME industry so threat of new entrants in this industry is very low.

Strategy during 1960’s

Strategy followed

  • Taking advantage of Japan’s MITI’s new policy which allowed to open EME Industry to foreign capital investment ...

This is a preview of the whole essay