A study into the origins of the Scottish Gales, through an examination of hill and river names in County Antrim in Ireland and Argyll in Scotland.

Authors Avatar

A study into the origins of the Scottish Gales, through an examination of hill and river names in County Antrim in Ireland and Argyll in Scotland.

The commonly accepted view of the origin of the Gaelic speaking Scottish Gales is that in the early 6th Century there was a mass movement of the Gaelic speaking Irish from Ireland across to Argyle. Here the Irish Gales are said to have displaced the Brittonic speakers and therefore introduced Gaelic to the west coast of Scotland. In the mid 9th Century the kings of the Scottish Gales took over the Pictish region on the east of Scotland to form the country now known as Scotland. This view, although well established and supported, is littered with holes in the argument. In an article by Ewan Campbell, it is shown that there is no solid archaeological evidence to suggest a vast movement of people from Antrim to Argyll. Furthermore he shows that the documentary sources are unreliable at best. Ideas are put forward to suggest that the fault line between the Gaelic and Pictish and Brittonic speakers is not the Irish Sea, as it would be by today’s societies, but the mountains of the Grampian Highlands. This shows that the Gaelic speaking area of Scotland could originally have been part of an Irish dynasty encompassing both Antrim and Argyll (Campbell 2001). This paper intends to examine the evidence within Campbell’s article and analyse it in relation to the hill and river names of County Antrim and Argyll. There will be an examination of individual elements found within the names, which are common to both areas. The results of this study will then be used to either support or contradict Campbell’s study.

It has been shown that there is very little archaeological evidence to support the view that Irish settlers came across to Argyll in vast numbers in the early 6th Century. This has lead to a more cautionary approach by current archaeologists in assessing the evidence differently to suggest that there may have been an elite take-over by the ruling kings. In addition it has been suggested that contact may have taken place over a longer period of time rather than a sudden and abrupt invasion (Foster, 1996; 13-14).  Even if this had been the case, and there had been a slow but gradual migration of people or a take-over of the ruling dynasty, there should be at least some archaeological evidence to support the theory. In this case there is none. An investigation of the settlement types of Argyll and Antrim show that although both possess a settlement type called a Crannog, possibly indicating the transition of an architectural type, dendrochronological dating has shown Scottish Crannogs are of an earlier date (Campbell, 2001; 287). This if anything shows that Argyll and Antrim had a shared cultural sensibility and could go so far as to support the view that cultural influences were actually going from Scotland to Ireland and not the other way around.

A mass scale migration seems to be ruled out by the lack of any transference of settlement types. The theory of a dynastic take over can also be discarded through an examination of brooches, which were used to distinguish the wealthy. The main brooch in Ireland in the 4th to 6th Centuries was the zoomorphic peannular brooch (Campbell, 2002; 287), which is widely distributed in Ireland, but only one has been found in Argyll. Evidence which supports the view that the cultural influence was in the direction of Scotland to Ireland rather than the opposite is the presented by the Type G peannular brooch typically found in western Britain. A workshop for this type of brooch was found in Dunadd in the kingdom of Dalriata (Antrim) that is dated to the early 8th Century but the earliest date for this type of brooch in Scotland is the early 7th Century (Campbell, 2001; 287). It can be seen that there is no archaeological evidence to support any sort of movement of people between Antrim and Argyll at this time. The historical sources can provide more of a solid basis for the common belief.

The Annals of Tigernach provide the most out right statement of a dynastic take-over “ Fergus Mor, mac Erc, with the nation of Dalriata, held part of Britain, and there he died” and is dated to 501 AD (Anderson, 1922; 1). However this is not a contemporary record and could not have been written until after the 10th Century. This can be seen in the spelling of certain words such as Fergus, which is spelt Feargus a Middle Irish form. If the record were contemporary then the expectation would be for the account to be in Old Irish, which would result in the form Fergus. Another prime source can also be shown to be written during the 10th Century, The Senchus FernAlban states “Erc moreover had twelve sons. i. six of them took possession of Alba”. This is obviously a 10th century account because of the occurrence of the term Alba for Scotland, which was not in use until after the 10th Century. Furthermore it is important to note that nowhere in this source is a large movement of people mentioned, it is merle a genealogical record of the origins of the Kings of Dalriata (Campbell, 2001; 288). These sources can be seen to some extent as legends constructed to show a particular area deriving from a mythical or religious figure. Moreover the legend could be manipulated to suit the political or social climate of the time. This supports the way that the sources were rewritten or inserted as new in the 10th Century, each trying to show their antiquity and Irish origins (Campbell, 2001; 288).

What is most important to establish is that there is a possibility that the fault line between the Q-Celtic area and the P-Celtic area may not be in the commonly accepted place of the Irish Sea. Early medieval Argyll was a sea based society (Campbell, 2001; 290) and with most of Ireland no more than a days sail away it is easy to perceive the Irish Sea as a connecting mechanism rather than a dividing one. This is further supported by the position of the Grampian Highlands, which could be seen as the other possible fault line. These mountains proved difficult to cross with only two or three routes through them each taking several days travel on foot, considerably more than the length of time to travel by sea to Ireland. Furthermore early medieval commentators saw the fault line as the Druim Albin, the Spine of Britain, which is now the mountain range known as the Grampian Highlands (Campbell 2001). Therefore it could be considered that the tribe of people living in Argyll was not a separate tribe from those living in Antrim. A suggestion could be that they were the same tribe of people separated by water. If this is the case then Argyll and Antrim should share common naming practices of the time. Hill and river names are some of the earliest types of names and so it should be expected that if the fault line was the Grampian Highlands then the languages of Argyll and Antrim should be the same; this language was Gaelic (Campbell, 2001; 291).

Gaelic is the principal language of hill and river names in Scotland, not just Argyll, and plays an important role in the hill and river names of Northern Ireland. In Antrim the names examined were all heavily anglicised but the origins of the names obviously lay in Gaelic. The purpose of examining hill and river names was because as features of the landscape they are mostly fixed. A river may dry up, or a hill may be cut through to make way for a road but on the whole these features will have remained the same throughout time. Therefore the names given to them should reflect the language spoken in that area at the time they were named.

Examining hill names firstly, there are 538 hill names recorded on the Ordinance Survey maps of Argyll and 164 recorded on the Ordinance Survey of Northern Ireland maps of County Antrim. Of the names recorded in Argyll they are mostly recorded in their original Gaelic form and have rarely been anglicised. The names drawn from the maps of Antrim, on the other hand, have all been heavily anglicised so it is more difficult to definitely identify the original elements within a name. The dataset obtained shows a vast and varied picture of Argyll and Antrim through the different elements included in the hill names. The first name element of significance that is relevant both to Argyll and to Antrim is Beinn, meaning “ a mountain, a hill, a pinnacle” and is said to have its origins in Early Irish (MacLennan, 2001; 35).

Beinn is the standard mountain name in Gaelic, and can be applied to both high peaks in mountain ranges and also to relatively small hills in a flat area. What is the important and distinguishing feature of a Beinn is that it is of marked size in relation to the area that surrounds it (Fraser, 1987; 186-7). Therefore it is not surprising that there are such a vast number of them in Argyll. There are 124 occurrences of the element Beinn, both in its anglicised and original form, but only three occur in Antrim. This is a disproportionately small number especially since the word originates from Early Irish. The three instances of the hill name are in Binbane, Binnagee and Binvore. The reason that there are such a small number of Beinn names in County Antrim is that the name element didn’t really take hold and only really came into its own in the Scottish Highlands (Drummond, 1991; 22). This could be taken as evidence for there being a shared cultural area between Antrim and Argyll. Moreover it if there had been a mass movement of people across to Argyll it would be expected that the new immigrants would take their naming practices with them, so as to make the new country feel more homely and welcoming. If the name element Beinn was not in frequent usage in Antrim then why would the new immigrants decide to use it in Argyll as an unfamiliar element. Surely if there had been a large migration of people they would take over their most frequently used name element and use that rather than one that was barely recognisable to them because of its infrequency of use in their home country.  Saying this the highest proportion of Beinn names is in Argyll and the Southern Hebrides, in view of Mull. This is a settlement pattern that is indicative of the place name originating from this area. This is not conclusive with the theory that the element was transferred by Irish settlers who came to Argyll, either in small or large numbers. If this is the case then Beinn can be considered as a very old place name element (Drummond, 1991; 22). Beinn can be considered as important because it is one of the oldest hill name elements; also its distribution pattern actually indicates a shared area between Antrim and Argyll with the highest proportion of names to the west of the Grampian Highlands. It is therefore possible to consider the fault line as being in the position of the Grampian Highlands but because of the relatively certain origin of the word from Early Irish the fault line could also be placed at the Irish Sea.

Although Beinn exhibits a relatively small proportion of the hill names shown in Antrim, Carn represents a reasonably high proportion. Carn, which is frequently anglicised to Cairn, is again an element that originates in Early Irish and means “a rocky hill or mountain” (MacLennan, 2001; 73). There are ten incidences of the element Cairn in Antrim and eight in Argyll. All of the eight in Argyll are in their original Gaelic form but in Antrim only one of the ten is in the original form; the rest have all been anglicised. The element signifies a major summit of a conical shape, it is important to recognise that although the name does occur in Argyll it is not with much frequency and in the places where it does occur the hills are not considered to be major summits (Fraser, 1987; 191). Its relative frequency in Antrim is conclusive with its origins in Early Irish, and is therefore supportive of the view that there was a take over of some sort of Argyll.  It shows that the name element was transferred across from Antrim to Argyll.  An alternate view of the origin of the element Carn is that the word was present in the north west highlands long before Gaelic or even Norse were introduced into Scotland. It was present in the name that the Roman geographers gave the tribe that they found present in that area: the Carnonacae. This can be either translated as “the people of the horns” which has no historical backing or “the people of the rocky hills” which could be taken as a reference to the type of hill now known as a Carn. Either it is just coincidence that the Gaelic word Carn and name the Romans gave to the tribe are the same or that the Roman name came from the tribes own name, which could have been based on the hills in the area. This name was then taken up later by Norse and Gaelic speakers (Drummond, 1991; 26-27). This provides a possible explanation for the small number of Carn names in Argyll, which is the typical source area for Gaelic terms. The name element is not originally Gaelic but Pictish. The infrequency of the occurrence of the name element in Argyll is indicative of the Gaelic/Brittonic/Pictish fault line being in the place of the Grampian Highlands. Moreover if the name element were originally Pictish then it would not be expected to be prevalent in areas of Scotland not inhabited by the Picts. This conflicts with the evidence that the name is from Early Irish and also provides a difficulty in explaining how Carn has become one of the most widespread name elements in Antrim. Could the name have been transferred to Argyll and used sporadically but never really took hold and then taken across to Antrim by the frequent sea travellers where it came into its own. This is almost a reverse example of the element Beinn where there are few examples of the element in Antrim but it proved much more popular in Argyll.

Join now!

An element relating to Carn is Carr. This is taken to mean “a rock, or rocky land” in many parts of Ireland, although is not formally recorded in dictionaries. It is quite obviously related semantically to the element Carn meaning “a rocky hill or mountain” (Joyce, 1887; 419). There are two possible occurrences of this element in Antrim Carrigan Hill and Carrigin and also two in Argyll Carran Mor and An Carr. Alternatively the place names in Antrim could be viewed as coming from the Irish word Carraigin meaning moss (HarperCollins, 2004; 406).  If this were the correct meaning ...

This is a preview of the whole essay