Book report James half brother of Jesus.

Authors Avatar

BOOK REPORT

JAMES

Half Brother of Jesus.

PA-110

NEW TESTAMENT AND MINISTRY

BOOK REPORT 4

MARK WILSON

27th March 2001

Book Report 4.                The Book of James.                Name: Mark Wilson.

Introduction.

James is seen to be the most practical and interesting books of the New Testament. My previous book report on Romans, Paul’s message expounded salvation by faith, where James expresses this faith in the way the Christian should live his life. To the Reformers of the Reformation, they saw this as coming dangerously close to a works-based salvation, (Richards 1994:573). “But be ye doers of the Word, and not hearers only” (James 1:22, KJV).

Author.

Nelson accepts the view of most scholars that James the half brother of Jesus is the author, as the epistle is somewhat similar to a speech in Acts 15 by James the half brother of Jesus, (Nelsons 1996:453). Richards also subscribes the authorship to James the half brother of Jesus. He goes on to say that James was a prominent leader of the Jerusalem church, a position confirmed by the Apostle Paul in Gal 2:9. He earnt the nickname of ‘the just’ by the early church, (Richards 1994:573). Hayford states that the author identifies himself as simply James, however, the name was very common in it’s day, and that there are at least five of them identified in the New Testament, two being disciples. Tradition ascribes the author to Jesus’ half brother and hence there has been no reason to question this view. (Hayford 1992:437). Elwell points out that the only other contender for authorship was James the son of Zebedee, however, his early martyrdom (a.d. 44; cf. Acts 12:2) probably removes him from consideration. Still others think that the good, almost literary Greek of the letter, along with the way the author handles the topic of justification (2:14–26), makes it likely that someone toward the end of the first century wrote the letter and ascribed it to James. But this theory is unnecessary and calls into question the honesty of the writer. There is every reason to accept the widespread opinion of the early church that James, the brother of the Lord, wrote this letter, (Elwell 1989 CDROM). Carson has some interesting contradictions, stating that it was written by an anonymous James, as the James of our Lord, would have mentioned his special relationship. Also, could a Galilean Jew, who never left Palestine, with concepts derived from Greek philosophy and religion, compose Greek with such sophisticated allusions? Many say no, (Carson 1992:411). However, I agree with Elwell as with tradition. I would tend to give much weight to the traditionally accepted views, as they are not given lightly.

Join now!

Date.

Elwell concludes that the book was written in the early a.d. 40’s, making it possibly the earliest New Testament book to be written. He goes on to say that the time frame is backed up by references in his writing, ie. the reference to the synagogue as the place of meeting (2:2), and the fact that the sharp debates over the place of the Law in Christianity, so prevalent from the latter 40s on, are not reflected in the letter, (Elwell 1989 CDROM). Hayford gives a broader estimate, between a.d. 48 and a.d. 62. This is based ...

This is a preview of the whole essay