• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Book Review - Fascism and the Right in Europe

Extracts from this document...


Book Review Blinkhorn, Martin, Fascism and the Right in Europe 1919 - 1945, (Longman, 2000), ISBN 0-582-07021-X, hardback: 192 pages Reviewed by: Mark-James Fisher Throughout its historiographical revolution, fascism is one controversial topic that is still shaping the views of modern European societies. Martin Blinkhorn is a professional historian at Lancaster University, specialising in the "History of Modern Spain and the wider Mediterranean region and the history of fascism and the political far right in twentieth-century Europe"1. Blinkhorn has produced many publications on the 'history of fascism', including books such as "Mussolini and Fascist Italy (2006)"2. Although unoriginal in its outlook, as part of the "Seminar Studies in History" collection, "Fascism and the Right in Europe 1919 - 1945"3 provides new insight into both the definitions and history of fascism. Blinkhorn aims "to explore fascism in its heyday"4 by exploring fascist and right-wing movements, and fascist regimes both throughout the inter-war period and Second World War, and as fascism was something of a 'metamorphosis'5, ultimately intends to "make some sense of this complex and bewildering collection of conundrums"6. Blinkhorn's historical judgement is conveyed in a well-structured manner because the chapters are divided into sub-sections. ...read more.


Blinkhorn conveys in the former chapter how different right-wing movements occurred between Inter-War Europe, in countries such as Italy, Germany, Romania, Bulgaria, Greece, Spain, Portugal, Britain and Ireland. He argues that although many of these movements gained "genuine mass support and political potency"14, it was only Mussolini's 'Italian Fascist Movement' and Hitler's 'German National Socialist Party' that had won "political power in what might be termed 'normal', that is to say peacetime conditions"15. These were then able to establish 'fascist' regimes. Blinkhorn effectively compares and contrasts the experiences of fascism within Italy and Germany, and hence uses this to reflect upon other right-wing movements and regimes within the Inter-War Period. Blinkhorn regards Fascist Italy as a "starting point and a model against which to examine other dictatorships of the political right, the Third Reich included"16. He agrees that fascism originated in Italy and this influenced n**i Germany and other right-wing movements, particularly, Sir Oswald Mosley's 'British Union of Fascists'17. However, although Blinkhorn agrees that Fascist Italy had influenced many other right-wing movements, he argues that "The Italian Fascist Regime was least 'fascist' than it appeared"18 because like other right-wing movements that were suppressed by establishments already in place, Mussolini's "constitutional position remained ultimately subordinate to the crown." ...read more.


Blinkhorn, in this chapter, puts forward a thoughtful viewpoint in helping us to understand how 'fascism' as an ideology is extremely complex. Blinkhorn, in "Fascism and the Right in Europe 1919 - 1945"27 has produced a short, yet very detailed book that brings new insight to the current historiography on fascism. It is an ideal text amongst academic students of fascism, who wish to actively engage with and understand its subject. Blinkhorn has effectively differentiated between the two major fascist regimes in Italy and Germany, and those less successful movements and regimes like Spain, Portugal, Bulgaria and Romania, whose 'fascist states' were born through the intervention of Fascist Italy and n**i Germany28. However, Blinkhorn has furthermore explored how Fascism in Italy and Germany were extremely different, the latter being more radical and exceeding the boundaries of 'fascism'. Blinkhorn's contribution to fascism's history raises questions for modern democracy. He fears that with the rise of more recent 'fascist' and 'national socialist' movements to prominence (like Austria's freedom party)29 "as a new century and a new millennium dawn, and as the memories of fascism's heyday recede, it would be dangerous to conclude that new versions of this menace will never re-appear to threaten the safety and the lives of minorities, and the safety of democracy"30. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree 1920-1949 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree 1920-1949 essays

  1. Why and when was Germany divided? 1945

    After much negotiation, in1949 the future relationship between the three allies and the new West German government was formalised by the Occupation Statute in April. So it can be argued that it was in 1949 that Germany was finally and completely divided because the country had been split into two

  2. Why US hegemony in the 20th century was inevitable.

    The US was in a position both militarily and economically to defend against further communist aggression, and was the sole possessor of nuclear weapons. That is until Russia developed nuclear weapons, and then the arms race was on. Cold War The US and Russia soon became known as 'superpowers' (As

  1. Book Review - The New Deal by Paul K. Conkin

    attributing Roosevelt's failings in this early period of his government to the ineptness of his predecessor but he certainly bears animosity towards Roosevelt for his refusal to cooperate with Hoover during his period as president elect. He argues persuasively that Roosevelt's inaction here exacerbated the human cost of the financial

  2. Why did the Labour Party win the General Election of 1945?

    Steven Fielding places much emphasis on the comment, 'by miscalculating public mood Churchill was literally overnight transformed from a national figurehead into a squalid party hack.' Fielding cites the Gallup poll conducted shortly after the event which found that

  1. Can Franco be described as a truly fascist dictator?

    This again is similar to the cult of personality both Hitler and Mussolini created around themselves. It is also fair to say that to an extent Franco attempted to mimic Mussolini's style of rule. For instance Franco gave himself the title of 'Caudillo' which roughly translates to leader in Spanish,

  2. Within the context 1814 1939, to what extent could the Wall Street Crash ...

    Therefore, the Depression is the main enabling factor to Hitler?s rise to power, ergo the main economic cause of the Second World War. Another factor for consideration, which could have evoked World War II, was the ineffectiveness and consequent economic weaknesses of the Weimar Republic.

  1. An Analysis of Edward Saids Out of Place from a Postcolonial Perspective

    Khalil Beidas was a cousin of Said?s father and he was also an Arabic teacher at St. George?s school. He went to Jerusalem?s Russian Colony school in his childhood and then, to Russia for higher education to return with a mind refreshed with 19th century Russian Christian nationalists, like Dostoyevsky.

  2. Were the Gypsies of Europe subject to a genocide in the years 1939-1945?

    Prejudice and r****t ideologies were in place before the outbreak of war, with regulations enforced to prevent the ?gypsy lifestyle?, including immobilisation and the introduction of gypsy camps (Lewy 2000:15). They were accused of being a primitive race and a burden on welfare and the general population, their dark complexion

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work