• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In arguing for the Copernican system Galileo demonstrated he was well equipped in balancing church and science.

Extracts from this document...


Galileo?s Trek Everyone knows the name Galileo Galilei now days and reveres it. His observations were astonishing to say the least. He was a spokesperson for logic, mathematics and most importantly, scientific methodology. As respected as he is now, almost five centuries ago this was not the case. What is now accepted knowledge was seen as heretical in his time. It was indeed an uphill battle for him. To prove the Sun was stationary and that in fact it was the Earth orbiting it went completely against a Church-dominated society where the Bible was the ultimate authority in all things and science came second. What Galileo did was an assault to their perfect reality. In those times everything was organized and perfectly explained. All objects outside Earth were perfect spheres held together in perfect symmetry. Galileo observed differently, in his letter The Starry Messenger he depicted our moon as he observed it. He observed features on it much like here on earth; there were craters and mountainous terrain, a far cry from perfect spheres. The moon was not the only heavenly body to be pull-down from perfection; the Sun has spots, it was not perfect as he described it on his Letters on Sunspots. ...read more.


Mathematics would require a person to be less free with their philosophical imagination and more procedural, precise. This also would have made the individual think for himself instead of just accepting ancient philosophies matter-of-factly. This would have been seen as highly disrespectful and blasphemous which for the times it meant a threat to their reality. Nature was not just for the philosopher but it could be quantify and explain with mathematics. Sequently, predictions could be issued base on mathematical observations of nature such as the law of falling objects discussed in the last book written in his life; The discourse of The Two New Sciences. Galileo discussed in the Two New Sciences that the path of any projectile is Parabolic or curved not straight. Galileo experimented with acceleration and proposed that all objects (in a vacuum) when dropped from the same high at the same time fall at the same rate. Additionally, he observed uniform acceleration in falling objects; that is to say a falling object increases speed at a predictable time rate. He further stated that in absence of friction a rolling object can move indefinitely; this was his law of Inertia. In arguing for the Copernican system Galileo demonstrated he was well equipped in balancing church and science. ...read more.


Not to mention, the Earth is made of rock not aether; it can?t possibly move. Finally, it is absolutely ludicrous for this gentleman to disregard common knowledge, all it?s held together ever-the-same, so perfectly in the crystal spheres; perfection need not change. Galileo never actually proved the Earth moved around the Sun, but it did not matter for he had done enough work to extrapolate it did. Much of the anger and fear projected at Galileo had to do with a threat to reality. The Church had to be right at all times for the Bible derived from God and God is perfection. Even though, Aristotelian science came from Aristotle and not the Bible, it did not matter. The Aristotelian view had been with the Church for so long that they had become one in the same. Galileo was fighting an uphill battle, but armed with the tools of the new science, anyone could test his results for themselves. I think it was this ability to see for one?s self, to follow the mathematics to Galileo?s own conclusions that eventually did away with the Church?s grip over science. I think Galileo?s triumph over the Church marked modern science?s first main victory for the mind of man. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree 1600-1699 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree 1600-1699 essays

  1. The Importance of the Diary for a Study of Archbishop Laud

    of observance to me' at the fore of his diary, meriting a place beside incidents such as the Duke of Buckingham's death and the birth of Charles II. It must therefore be questioned why Laud should place so much significance upon Woodstock; if Como is to be believed, perhaps Laud

  2. Throughout the history of the United States of America, four American presidents have been ...

    He even stopped going to church, a drastic change for someone of Slavic descent who was raised as a Catholic all his life. This represents the phase of him avoiding other people and withdrawing from social activities.49 Vulnerable "to collapse", the incident that served as a trigger for a psychotic

  1. Michael Collins: Big Man or just a Man?

    It is important to realise that Collins was not the only person capable of carrying out the coordination of these tasks, admittedly he did it with irrepressible energy and ingenuity,5 nevertheless the fact remains that someone else could have filled his shoes just as they did upon his death.

  2. Sisyphus and the Anger of Zeus - Portugal: The Endless Rise and Fall of ...

    Although the kings of L�on controlled this region in the north, called Portucalense, it was actually ruled by almost autonomous counts. During the time the kings of Portugal managed the liberation of the territory from the Muslims. The man who defeated some of the last groups of Muslims from Portuguese territory was Afonso Henriques.

  1. Louis Riel is perhaps one of the most controversial figures in Canadian historiography.

    his dignity to do so."18 Thomas Scott merely 'sneered' at Riel and 'made fun of' the M�tis leader.19 "[It] is said that he violently attacked his guards, incited his companions to do likewise and threatened the life of Riel if he ever escaped."20 This description of Thomas Scott's behaviour matches Louis Riel's telling of the events.

  2. Technological Change since 1700

    And by 1840 the labor cost of making the best woolen cloth had fallen by at least half. A. The Steam Engine The steam engine provided a landmark in the industrial development of Europe. The first modern steam engine was built by an engineer, Thomas Newcomen, in 1705 to improve

  1. Theory of Knowledge - A Dialogue between Platonist and Modern Philosopher.

    Our senses fool us. Our limited imagination and knowledge fool us as well. We can not make our senses keener or enhance them drastically. But we can climb up, enhancing our knowledge. James: But the book will always be a book.

  2. The Seventeenth Century Scientific Revolution. There were three major scientific figures who contributed ...

    The first law was that every object in a state of uniform motion tends to remain in that state of motion unless an external force is applied to it. The second law was that changes in motion are proportional to force.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work